Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Petov, Vladislav [1 ]
Azilgareeva, Camilla [1 ]
Shpikina, Anastasia [1 ]
Morozov, Andrey [1 ]
Krupinov, German [1 ]
Kozlov, Vasiliy [2 ]
Singla, Nirmish [3 ,4 ]
Gomez Rivas, Juan [5 ,6 ]
Jesus, Moreno-Sierra [5 ]
Puliatti, Stefano [6 ,7 ]
Checcucci, Enrico [6 ,8 ]
Rodler, Severin [6 ,9 ]
Belenchon, Ines Rivero [6 ,10 ]
Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich [6 ,11 ]
Veccia, Alessandro [6 ,12 ]
Mcfarland, Jonathan [13 ,14 ]
Cacciamani, Giovanni E. [6 ,15 ,16 ]
Taratkin, Mark [1 ,6 ]
Enikeev, Dmitry [1 ]
机构
[1] Sechenov Univ, Inst Urol & Reprod Hlth, Moscow 119991, Russia
[2] Sechenov Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Healthcare, Moscow 119991, Russia
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Dept Oncol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[5] Clin San Carlos Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Madrid 28040, Spain
[6] European Assoc Urol, Young Acad Urologists YAU Working Grp Urotechnol, NL-3001 Arnhem, Netherlands
[7] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Urol Dept, I-42121 Modena, Italy
[8] FPO IRCCS, Candiolo Canc Inst, Dept Surg, I-10060 Turin, Italy
[9] Klinikum Univ Munchen, Dept Urol, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[10] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[11] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Urol, D-69047 Heidelberg, Germany
[12] Azienda Osped Univ Integrata, Urol Unit, I-37126 Verona, Italy
[13] Sechenov Univ, Inst Linguist & Intercultural Commun, Moscow 123242, Russia
[14] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Med, Madrid 28029, Spain
[15] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[16] Univ Southern Calif, USC Inst Urol, Artificial Intelligence Ctr USC Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
systematic review; meta-analysis; robot-assisted prostate biopsy; MR-targeted biopsy; prostate cancer; ULTRASOUND FUSION; IN-BORE; FEASIBILITY; CANCER; SAFETY; COMPLICATIONS; INTERVENTION; MANIPULATOR; DEVICE;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15041181
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Robotic devices are being actively introduced into the urology field. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable csPCa and overall detection rates [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I-2 = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I-2 = 40%, respectively]. A robot-assisted biopsy can potentially be performed under local anesthesia or sedation. Furthermore, a robot-assisted biopsy is a safe and feasible option with a low risk of complications. Introduction: Robot-assisted devices have been recently developed for use in prostate biopsy. However, it is possible advantages over standard biopsy remain unclear. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The detailed search strategy is available at Prospero (CRD42021269290). The primary outcome was the clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. The secondary outcomes included the overall detection rate of PCa, cancer detection rate per core, and complications. Results: The clinically significant cancer detection rate, overall cancer detection rate, and "per patient" did not significantly differ between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I-2 = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I-2 = 40%, respectively]. There were no differences in the clinically insignificant cancer detection rate "per patient" between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.54; 1.21), p = 0.31, I-2 = 0%]. RA-TB had a significantly higher cancer detection rate "per core" [OR = 3.01 (95% CI 2.77; 3.27), p < 0.0001, I-2 = 96%]. Conclusion: RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable clinical significance and overall PCa detection rates.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Stabile, Armando
    Neves, Joana B.
    Giganti, Francesco
    Valerio, Massimo
    Shanmugabavan, Yaalini
    Clement, Keiran D.
    Sarkar, Debashis
    Philippou, Yiannis
    Thurtle, David
    Deeks, Jonathan
    Emberton, Mark
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Moore, Caroline M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (03) : 284 - 303
  • [2] Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Drost, Frank-Jan H.
    Osses, Daniel
    Nieboer, Daan
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (01) : 78 - 94
  • [3] Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Rajwa, Pawel
    Miszczyk, Marcin
    Fazekas, Tamas
    Carletti, Filippo
    Carrozza, Salvatore
    Sattin, Francesca
    Reitano, Giuseppe
    Botti, Simone
    Matsukawa, Akihiro
    Dal Moro, Fabrizio
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Briganti, Alberto
    Novara, Giacomo
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (06): : 1303 - 1312
  • [4] Targeted vs systematic robot-assisted transperineal magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy
    Mischinger, Johannes
    Kaufmann, Sascha
    Russo, Giorgio I.
    Harland, Niklas
    Rausch, Steffen
    Amend, Bastian
    Scharpf, Marcus
    Loewe, Lorenz
    Todenhoefer, Tilman
    Notohamiprodjo, Mike
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Bedke, Jens
    Kruck, Stephan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (05) : 791 - 798
  • [5] Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Giganti, Francesco
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (06) : 946 - 958
  • [6] Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Uleri, Alessandro
    Baboudjian, Michael
    Tedde, Alessandro
    Gallioli, Andrea
    Long-Depaquit, Thibaut
    Palou, Joan
    Basile, Giuseppe
    Gaya, Josep Maria
    Sanguedolce, Francesco
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Rajwa, Pawel
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Roupret, Morgan
    Briganti, Alberto
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Breda, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2023, 6 (06): : 621 - 628
  • [7] ROUTINE SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSIES NOT REPLACED BY MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-TARGETED BIOPSY
    Gomez-Ortiz, David
    Garza-Gangemi, Adrian M.
    Oropeza-Aguilar, Mariano
    Rangel-Suarez, Sergio
    Espinosa-Cruz, Veronica
    Villegas-Hernandez, Antonio C.
    Martinez-Martinez, Ricardo
    Castillejos-Molina, Ricardo A.
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL INVESTIGATION, 2022, 74 (04): : 212 - 218
  • [8] Robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Porto Junior, Silvio
    Meira, Davi Amorim
    da Cunha, Beatriz Lopes Bernardo
    Fontes, Jefferson Heber Marques
    Pustilnik, Hugo Nunes
    Nunes, Gabriel Souza Medrado
    Cerqueira, Gabriel Araujo
    Vassoler, Maria Eduarda Messias
    Monteiro, Philippe Quadros
    da Paz, Matheus Gomes da Silva
    Alcantara, Tancredo
    Dourado, Jules Carlos
    de Avellar, Leonardo Miranda
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2024, 47 (01)
  • [9] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy and Pretherapeutic Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment: a Systematic Review
    Diamand, R.
    Mjaess, G.
    Ploussard, G.
    Fiard, G.
    Oderda, M.
    Lefebvre, Y.
    Sirtaine, N.
    Roumeguere, T.
    Peltier, A.
    Albisinni, S.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2022, 32 (06):
  • [10] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy May Enhance the Diagnostic Accuracy of Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Compared to Standard Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (03) : 438 - 450