Systematical analysis of sludge treatment and disposal technologies for carbon footprint reduction

被引:38
作者
Zhao, Yingxin [1 ]
Yang, Zhifan [1 ,2 ]
Niu, Jiaojiao [1 ]
Du, Zihan [3 ]
Federica, Conti [4 ]
Zhu, Zhe [5 ]
Yang, Kaichao [1 ]
Li, Yan [6 ]
Zhao, Baofeng [6 ]
Pedersen, Thomas Helmer [4 ]
Liu, Chunguang [7 ]
Emmanuel, Mutabazi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Municipal Engn Design & Res Inst Co Ltd, Tianjin 300380, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ, Tianjin Int Engn Inst, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[4] Aalborg Univ, Dept Energy Technol, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
[5] Tianjin Univ Technol, Sch Environm Sci & Safety Engn, Tianjin 300384, Peoples R China
[6] Shandong Acad Sci, Energy Res Inst, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
[7] Shandong Kailin Environm Protect Equipment Co Ltd, Heze 274000, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES | 2023年 / 128卷
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Bibliometrics; Sewage sludge; Greenhouse gas; Life cycle assessment; Sludge management; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; VOLATILE FATTY-ACIDS; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; FOOD WASTE; HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION; ENERGY-BALANCE; BIOGAS PRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jes.2022.07.038
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study aims to comprehensively analyze the Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) emissions from current sewage sludge treatment and disposal technologies (building material, landfill, land spreading, anaerobic digestion, and thermochemical processes) based on the database of Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) from 1998 to 2020. The general patterns, spatial distribution, and hotspots were provided by bibliometric analysis. A comparative quantitative analysis based on life cycle assessment (LCA) put forward the current emission situation and the key influencing factors of different technologies. The effective GHG emissions reduction methods were proposed to mitigate climate change. Results showed that incineration or building materials manufacturing of highly dewatered sludge, and land spreading after anaerobic digestion have the best GHG emissions reduction benefits. Biological treatment technologies and thermochemical processes have great potential for reducing GHGs. Enhancement of pretreatment effect, co-digestion, and new technologies (e.g., injection of carbon dioxide, directional acidification) are major approaches to facilitate substitution emissions in sludge anaerobic digestion. The relationship between the quality and efficiency of secondary energy in thermochemical process and GHGs emission still needs further study. Solid sludge products generated by bio-stabilization or thermochemical processes are considered to have a certain carbon sequestration value and can improve the soil environment to control GHG emissions. The findings are useful for future development and processes selection of sludge treatment and disposal facing carbon footprint reduction. (C) 2022 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 249
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Carbon footprint of fertilizer technologies [J].
Chojnacka, K. ;
Kowalski, Z. ;
Kulczycka, J. ;
Dmytryk, A. ;
Gorecki, H. ;
Ligas, B. ;
Gramza, M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 231 :962-967
[22]   Petroleum sludge treatment and disposal techniques: a review [J].
Murungi, Pearl Isabellah ;
Sulaimon, Aliyu Adebayo .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (27) :40358-40372
[23]   An environmental LCA of alternative scenarios of urban sewage sludge treatment and disposal [J].
Tarantini, Mario ;
Butol, Patrizia ;
Marorino, Lorenzo .
THERMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 11 (03) :153-164
[24]   A system engineering perspective for net zero carbon emission in wastewater and sludge treatment industry: A review [J].
Guo, Dengting ;
Li, Bing ;
Yu, Wei ;
Baroutian, Saeid ;
Young, Brent R. .
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 46 :369-381
[25]   Identifying energy and carbon footprint optimization potentials of a sludge treatment line with Life Cycle Assessment [J].
Remy, C. ;
Lesjean, B. ;
Waschnewski, J. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 67 (01) :63-73
[26]   Comparative economic, environmental and exergy analysis of power generation technologies from the waste sludge treatment [J].
Shi, Tao ;
Moktadir, Md Abdul ;
Ren, Jingzheng ;
Shen, Weifeng .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 286
[27]   Assessment of carbon footprint emissions and environmental concerns of solid waste treatment and disposal techniques; case study of Malaysia [J].
Malakahmad, Amirhossein ;
Abualqumboz, Motasem S. ;
Kutty, Shamsul Rahman M. ;
Abunama, Taher J. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 70 :282-292
[28]   Petroleum sludge treatment and disposal: A review [J].
Johnson, Olufemi Adebayo ;
Affam, Augustine Chioma .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2019, 24 (02) :191-201
[29]   Carbon footprint and economic viability assessment of recycling sewage sludge in sintered brick manufacturing route [J].
Yang, Hang ;
Guo, Yali ;
Fang, Ning ;
Fan, Jin ;
Dong, Bin .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2024,
[30]   Life cycle carbon footprints of alternative sludge pretreatment technologies to recover carbon sources for denitrification [J].
Zhao, Silan ;
Xu, Yingjie ;
Yuan, Jiayi ;
Chang, Huimin ;
Wang, Shengwei ;
Zhao, Yan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 472