Investigation on the causality relationship between environmental innovation and energy consumption: Empirical evidence from EU countries

被引:31
|
作者
Usman, Muhammad [1 ,2 ]
Radulescu, Magdalena [3 ,4 ]
Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel [5 ,6 ]
Rehman, Abdul [7 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Inst Reg & Urban Rural Dev, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Ind Dev & Reg Competitiveness, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Pitesti, Dept Finance Accounting & Econ, Pitesti, Arges, Romania
[4] Univ Lucian Blaga Sibiu, Inst Doctoral & Post Doctoral Studies, Bd Victoriei, Sibiu, Romania
[5] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Dept Polit Econ & Publ Finance Econ & Business St, Cuenca, Spain
[6] Univ Alicante, Dept Appl Econ, Alicante, Spain
[7] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Non-renewable and renewable energy; environmental innovations; environmental investment; causality analysis; 15 European countries; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CO2; EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION; ECO-INNOVATION; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PANEL-DATA;
D O I
10.1177/0958305X221120931
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental innovations, investments, and expenses have been identified as an efficient and reliable way of addressing ecological issues. Nevertheless, how environmental innovations, investments, and expenses may influence the level of environmental pollution in European nations and whether the outcome may fluctuate among various environmental innovation indicators remain to be inspected. Therefore, this research is designed to empirically scrutinize the influence of environmental innovations, environmental investment, environmental expenditure, research and development (R&D) expenses, and foreign direct investment (FDI) on renewable and non-renewable energy in a sample of 15 European countries during the period from 2005 to 2018. To achieve this, we apply robust panel econometric estimation techniques. After testing the stationary property of the series, the findings of the Pedroni cointegration test disclose the presence of a long-run stable connection among the series. The empirical results from the ARDL, FMOLS and DOLS regression show that the impact of environmental innovations, environmental expenditure, R&D expenses, and FDI help to reduce overall non-renewable energy and promote renewable energy. In contrast, environmental investment significantly increases non-renewable energy and diminishes renewable energy usage. Moreover, the findings of Dumitrescu and Hurlin's tests discover a unidirectional causality running from non-renewables and renewables towards environmental investment, environmental expenditure, and FDI. Additionally, bi-directional causality is found between environmental innovations R&D, with both non-renewable and renewable energy utilization. Furthermore, we summarize by arguing that the efforts toward efficient and sustainable use of energy by reducing the combustion of non-renewable energy sources should support modern and innovative strategies by ensuring the transformation of non-renewables with renewable energy sources.
引用
收藏
页码:3130 / 3159
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Relationship between Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty. Empirical Evidence for the Newest EU Countries
    Viorica, Daniela
    Jemna, Danut
    Pintilescu, Carmen
    Asandului, Mircea
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [32] Causality between Technological Innovation and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Economies of Developing Countries
    Mohamed, Maha Mohamed Alsebai
    Liu, Pingfeng
    Nie, Guihua
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [33] The Relationship between Geothermal Energy Consumption, Foreign Direct Investment, and Economic Growth in Geothermal Consumer Countries: Evidence from Panel Fourier Causality Test
    Zeren, Feyyaz
    Gulcan, Nazliguel
    Gursoy, Samet
    Eksi, Ibrahim Halil
    Tabash, Mosab I.
    Radulescu, Magdalena
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (03)
  • [34] The relationship between TFP and innovation performance: evidence from EU regions
    Kijek, Tomasz
    Matras-Bolibok, Anna
    EQUILIBRIUM-QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC POLICY, 2019, 14 (04): : 695 - 709
  • [35] Examining the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption inMINTcountries: Evidence from bootstrap panel granger causality
    Fahimi, Amin
    Olasehinde-Williams, Godwin
    Akadiri, Seyi Saint
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2021, 26 (02) : 1886 - 1896
  • [36] A Symmetry and Asymmetry Investigation of the Nexus Between Environmental Sustainability, Renewable Energy, Energy Innovation, and Trade: Evidence From Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Selected MENA Countries
    Andriamahery, Anselme
    Qamruzzaman, Md.
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 9
  • [37] Innovation, Energy Consumption and Trade Dynamic: Evidence from Developed and Developing Countries
    Asghar, Muhammad
    Chaudhry, Imran Sharif
    Ali, Sharafat
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (01) : 4356 - 4382
  • [38] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE, ENERGY DEMAND, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY: AN EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
    Yu, Zhang
    Golpira, Heris
    Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman
    LOGFORUM, 2018, 14 (04) : 479 - 494
  • [39] Energy consumption, technological innovation, and environmental degradation in SADC countries
    Sibanda, Kin
    Takentsi, Siyakudumisa
    Gonese, Dorcas
    COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [40] The causal relationship between coal consumption and economic growth in the BRICS countries: Evidence from panel-Granger causality tests
    Chang, Tsangyao
    Deale, Derick
    Gupta, Rangan
    Hefer, Roulof
    Inglesi-Lotz, Roula
    Simo-Kengne, Beatrice
    ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2017, 12 (02) : 138 - 146