A study on the combination of functional connection features and Riemannian manifold in EEG emotion recognition

被引:5
作者
Wu, Minchao [1 ,2 ]
Ouyang, Rui [1 ]
Zhou, Chang [1 ]
Sun, Zitong [1 ]
Li, Fan [2 ]
Li, Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Anhui Prov Key Lab Multimodal Cognit Computat, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Civil Aviat Flight Univ China, Key Lab Flight Tech & Flight Safety, Guanghan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
emotion recognition; human-computer interface (HCI); electroencephalogram (EEG); functional connection feature; Riemannian manifold; decision fusion; CLASSIFICATION; MATRICES;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2023.1345770
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction Affective computing is the core for Human-computer interface (HCI) to be more intelligent, where electroencephalogram (EEG) based emotion recognition is one of the primary research orientations. Besides, in the field of brain-computer interface, Riemannian manifold is a highly robust and effective method. However, the symmetric positive definiteness (SPD) of the features limits its application.Methods In the present work, we introduced the Laplace matrix to transform the functional connection features, i.e., phase locking value (PLV), Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), spectral coherent (COH), and mutual information (MI), to into semi-positive, and the max operator to ensure the transformed feature be positive. Then the SPD network is employed to extract the deep spatial information and a fully connected layer is employed to validate the effectiveness of the extracted features. Particularly, the decision layer fusion strategy is utilized to achieve more accurate and stable recognition results, and the differences of classification performance of different feature combinations are studied. What's more, the optimal threshold value applied to the functional connection feature is also studied.Results The public emotional dataset, SEED, is adopted to test the proposed method with subject dependent cross-validation strategy. The result of average accuracies for the four features indicate that PCC outperform others three features. The proposed model achieve best accuracy of 91.05% for the fusion of PLV, PCC, and COH, followed by the fusion of all four features with the accuracy of 90.16%.Discussion The experimental results demonstrate that the optimal thresholds for the four functional connection features always kept relatively stable within a fixed interval. In conclusion, the experimental results demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Emotion Recognition from Multidimensional Electroencephalographic Signals On the Manifold of Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices
    Abdel-Ghaffar, Eman A.
    Daoudi, Mohamed
    [J]. THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA INFORMATION PROCESSING AND RETRIEVAL (MIPR 2020), 2020, : 354 - 359
  • [2] Social Interaction Context Shapes Emotion Recognition Through Body Language, Not Facial Expressions
    Abramson, Lior
    Petranker, Rotem
    Marom, Inbal
    Aviezer, Hillel
    [J]. EMOTION, 2021, 21 (03) : 557 - 568
  • [3] Classification of covariance matrices using a Riemannian-based kernel for BCI applications
    Barachant, Alexandre
    Bonnet, Stephane
    Congedo, Marco
    Jutten, Christian
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2013, 112 : 172 - 178
  • [4] Congedo M, 2017, BRAIN-COMPUT INTERFA, V4, P155, DOI 10.1080/2326263X.2017.1297192
  • [5] Analysis of functional brain connections for positive-negative emotions using phase locking value
    Dasdemir, Yasar
    Yildirim, Esen
    Yildirim, Serdar
    [J]. COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS, 2017, 11 (06) : 487 - 500
  • [6] An Efficient LSTM Network for Emotion Recognition From Multichannel EEG Signals
    Du, Xiaobing
    Ma, Cuixia
    Zhang, Guanhua
    Li, Jinyao
    Lai, Yu-Kun
    Zhao, Guozhen
    Deng, Xiaoming
    Liu, Yong-Jin
    Wang, Hongan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING, 2022, 13 (03) : 1528 - 1540
  • [7] Duan RN, 2013, I IEEE EMBS C NEUR E, P81, DOI 10.1109/NER.2013.6695876
  • [8] AN ARGUMENT FOR BASIC EMOTIONS
    EKMAN, P
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 1992, 6 (3-4) : 169 - 200
  • [9] EEG coherence or EEG correlation?
    Guevara, MA
    CorsiCabrera, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 23 (03) : 145 - 153
  • [10] Phase synchronization for the recognition of mental tasks in a brain-computer interface
    Gysels, E
    Celka, P
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2004, 12 (04) : 406 - 415