共 50 条
NUTMEG: A randomized phase II study of nivolumab and temozolomide versus temozolomide alone in newly diagnosed older patients with glioblastoma
被引:6
|作者:
Sim, Hao-Wen
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Wachsmuth, Luke
[5
]
Barnes, Elizabeth H.
[1
,12
]
Yip, Sonia
[1
]
Koh, Eng-Siew
[2
,6
]
Hall, Merryn
[1
]
Jennens, Ross
[7
,8
]
Ashley, David M.
[9
]
Verhaak, Roel G.
[10
]
Heimberger, Amy B.
[11
]
Rosenthal, Mark A.
[7
]
Hovey, Elizabeth J.
[2
]
Ellingson, Benjamin M.
[13
]
Tognela, Annette
[14
]
Gan, Hui K.
[15
]
Wheeler, Helen
[16
]
Back, Michael
[16
]
Mcdonald, Kerrie L.
[2
]
Long, Anne
[17
]
Cuff, Katharine
[18
]
Begbie, Stephen
[19
]
Gedye, Craig
[20
]
Mislang, Anna
[21
,22
]
Le, Hien
[23
]
Johnson, Margaret O.
[9
]
Kong, Benjamin Y.
[1
,2
,12
]
Simes, John R.
[1
,4
]
Lwin, Zarnie
[24
,25
]
Khasraw, Mustafa
[1
,5
,9
,26
]
机构:
[1] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Kinghorn Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Med Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Sch Med, Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Durham, NC USA
[6] Liverpool Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Epworth HealthCare Richmond, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Duke Univ, Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Ctr, Med Ctr, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[10] Univ Connecticut, Hlth Ctr, Jackson Lab Genom Med, Farmington, CT USA
[11] Northwestern Univ, Malnati Brain Tumor Inst, Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg,Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[12] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[13] Univ Calif Los Angeles, UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Lab, Los Angeles, CA USA
[14] Campbelltown Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[15] Austin Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[16] Royal North Shore Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[17] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Perth, WA, Australia
[18] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[19] Port Macquarie Base Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia
[20] Calvary Mater Newcastle, Dept Med Oncol, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[21] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[22] Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[23] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[24] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[25] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[26] Duke Univ, Box 3624, Durham, NC 27710 USA
基金:
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词:
clinical trials;
glioblastoma;
immunotherapy;
older cancer patients;
systemic therapy;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
AGE-RELATED-CHANGES;
RESPONSE ASSESSMENT;
PD-1;
BLOCKADE;
CANCER;
IMMUNOSUPPRESSION;
RADIOTHERAPY;
RADIATION;
BEVACIZUMAB;
LYMPHOCYTES;
D O I:
10.1093/noajnl/vdad124
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background There is an immunologic rationale to evaluate immunotherapy in the older glioblastoma population, who have been underrepresented in prior trials. The NUTMEG study evaluated the combination of nivolumab and temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma aged 65 years and older.Methods NUTMEG was a multicenter 2:1 randomized phase II trial for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma aged 65 years and older. The experimental arm consisted of hypofractionated chemoradiation with temozolomide, then adjuvant nivolumab and temozolomide. The standard arm consisted of hypofractionated chemoradiation with temozolomide, then adjuvant temozolomide. The primary objective was to improve overall survival (OS) in the experimental arm.Results A total of 103 participants were randomized, with 69 in the experimental arm and 34 in the standard arm. The median (range) age was 73 (65-88) years. After 37 months of follow-up, the median OS was 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.7-13.4) in the experimental arm and 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.3-14.8) in the standard arm. For the experimental arm relative to the standard arm, the OS hazard ratio was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.54-1.33). In the experimental arm, there were three grade 3 immune-related adverse events which resolved, with no unexpected serious adverse events.Conclusions Due to insufficient evidence of benefit with nivolumab, the decision was made not to transition to a phase III trial. No new safety signals were identified with nivolumab. This complements the existing series of immunotherapy trials. Research is needed to identify biomarkers and new strategies including combinations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文