Impact of Dexmedetomidine Infusion during Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Fernandes, Sarita [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ramchandani, Pooja [1 ,2 ]
Harde, Minal [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Topiwalla Natl Med Coll, Dept Anaesthesiol, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[2] BYL Nair Charitable Hosp, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[3] 701 Midsummer,94-B,Linking Rd, Mumbai 400054, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Bloodless surgical field; Fromme and Boezaart scale; Hypotension; Minimum alveolar concentration; CONTROLLED HYPOTENSIVE ANESTHESIA; DOSE DEXMEDETOMIDINE; NITROPRUSSIDE; REMIFENTANIL; PROPOFOL; ESMOLOL; FIELD;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2023/62730.18286
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) requires a surgical field with minimal bleeding, and numerous pharmacological agents have been used to achieve this. Dexmedetomidine has been widely used as a sedative, analgesic, and as a supplement to general anaesthesia. It has been found to decrease norepinephrine release, thereby decreasing heart rate (HR) and blood pressure. These properties, along with its opioid-sparing analgesic effects, make it an attractive drug to use during FESS.Aim: The aim of this study was to determine if dexmedetomidine infusion during FESS improves the visibility of the surgical field, provides stable haemodynamics, and alters the consumption of sevoflurane and other anaesthetic agents.Materials and Methods: This randomised, double-blinded controlled trial was conducted at the Otorhinolaryngology Operation Theatre, BYL Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, India, from July 2018 to December 2019. The study included 100 patients of either sex, with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I and II classification, aged 18-55 years, who were randomly divided into two groups. Group D received a dexmedetomidine infusion (0.5 mcg/kg/hour), while group C (control group) received a saline infusion. Haemodynamic parameters, Minimum Alveolar Concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane, surgeon's grading of the operative field, and the requirement of additional hypotensive agents were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's unpaired t-test to evaluate the significance of normally distributed variables, Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test for ordinal data and categorical variables.Results: The groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, gender, and ASA grade. The average mean MAC of sevoflurane at various time intervals was 1.135 & PLUSMN;0.664635 in group D and 1.9675 & PLUSMN;0.438 in group C, which was statistically significant. The surgeon's grading of the surgical field using the Fromme and Boezaart scale was significantly better in group D (1.53 & PLUSMN;0.45625 versus 2.907 & PLUSMN;0.5835 in the control group). Although not statistically significant, more number of patients in group C needed additional drugs to lower HR and blood pressure.Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine infusion during FESS is effective in maintaining stable haemodynamics with a lesser need for additional agents to lower HR and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP). It improves the visibility of the surgical field and decreases the MAC of sevoflurane required to maintain anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:UC19 / UC24
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine reduces functional endoscopic sinus surgery bleeding
    Ding, Deng-Feng
    Wu, Li-Fang
    Wang, Ping
    Jiang, Yuan-Xu
    Luo, Yao-Wen
    Dai, Zhong-Liang
    Zhang, Xue-Ping
    Li, Ya-Li
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (05) : 4521 - 4526
  • [2] Comparative evaluation of propofol versus dexmedetomidine infusion for hypotensive anesthesia during functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective randomized trial
    Gupta, Kewal Krishan
    Kumari, Vandana
    Kaur, Sarvjeet
    Singh, Amanjot
    ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (03): : 271 - 279
  • [3] Comparison between magnesium sulfate and dexmedetomidine in controlled hypotension during functional endoscopic sinus surgery
    Bayram, Adnan
    Ulgey, Ayse
    Gunes, Isin
    Ketenci, Ibrahim
    Capar, Ayse
    Esmaoglu, Aliye
    Boyaci, Adem
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2015, 65 (01): : 61 - 67
  • [4] Comparison Between Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil for Controlled Hypotension and Recovery in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
    Lee, Jungah
    Kim, Yongshin
    Park, Chansoon
    Jeon, Yeonsu
    Kim, Daewoo
    Joo, Jinduk
    Kang, Hyerim
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 122 (07): : 421 - 426
  • [5] Controlled Hypotension for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Comparative study of Dexmedetomidine and Esmolol
    Shaheen, Md Shafiul Alam
    Chowdhury, A. K. M. Nurnobi
    Sardar, Kawsar
    Rahman, Mushfiqur
    Biswas, Sudhangshu Shekhar
    Taous, Ahmmad
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 24 (01): : 37 - 49
  • [6] Dexmedetomidine improves the quality of the operative field for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: systematic review
    Snidvongs, K.
    Tingthanathikul, W.
    Aeumjaturapat, S.
    Chusakul, S.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2015, 129 : S8 - S13
  • [7] Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus propofol-based anaesthesia for controlled hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery
    Bharathwaj, D. K.
    Kamath, S. S.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 25 (02) : 37 - 40
  • [8] Impact of Controlled Induced Hypotension on Cognitive Functions of Patients Undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
    Nowak, Stanislaw
    Oldak, Anna
    Kluzik, Anna
    Drobnik, Leon
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2016, 22 : 898 - 907
  • [9] Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of nitroprusside and remifentanil for controlled hypotension during endoscopic sinus surgery
    Yun, So Hui
    Kim, Jeong Hong
    Kim, Hyun Jung
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (01) : 35 - 39
  • [10] Blood Loss During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery With Propofol or Sevoflurane A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Chaaban, Mohamad R.
    Baroody, Fuad M.
    Gottlieb, Ori
    Naclerio, Robert M.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2013, 139 (05) : 510 - 514