Modeling drivers and barriers of climate change mitigation strategies in Indian iron and steel industry: a TISM-based approach

被引:2
作者
Singh, Puja [1 ]
Pradhan, Vishal Suresh [1 ]
Patil, Yogesh B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Symbiosis Int Univ, Symbiosis Ctr Res & Innovat, Pune, India
关键词
Total interpretive structural modeling (TISM); Drivers; Barriers; Indian iron and steel industry (IISI); Climate change mitigation strategies (CCMS); ENERGY MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; REDUCTION; CHINA;
D O I
10.1108/MEQ-04-2023-0097
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeThe main purpose of this paper is to investigate drivers and barriers of climate change mitigation strategies (CCMS), their linkages and impact in Indian Iron and Steel Industry (IISI) in light of ninth sustainable development goal (building resilient infrastructure, promote sustainable industrialization and foster innovation).Design/methodology/approachTo identify relevant drivers and barriers, a thorough literature review and opinions of industry experts were obtained. Utilizing Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (TISM), the selected drivers and barriers were modeled separately along with Cross Impact Matrix-multiplication Applied to Classification (MICMAC).FindingsPragmatic and cost-effective technology, less supply chain complexity, robust policy and legal framework were found to have the highest driving power over all the other drivers. Findings suggest political pressure as the most critical barrier in this study. The results from TISM and MICMAC analysis have been used to elucidate a framework for the understanding of policymakers and achieve top management commitment.Practical implicationsThis paper will help researchers, academicians, industry analysts and policymakers in developing a systems approach in prioritizing CCMS in energy-intensive (coal dependent) iron and steel plants. The model outcomes of this work will aid operational research to understand the working principles in other industries as well.Originality/valueTo the best of authors' knowledge, there is paucity of reported literature for the drivers and barriers of CCMS in iron and steel industry. This paper can be considered a unique, first attempt to use data from developing nations like India to develop a model and explain relationships of the existing drivers and barriers of CCMS.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 60
页数:23
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Drivers and Barriers for Efficient Energy Management Practices in Energy-Intensive Industries: A Case-Study of Iron and Steel Sector
    Ahmad, Iftikhar
    Arif, Muhammad Salman
    Cheema, Izzat Iqbal
    Thollander, Patrik
    Khan, Masroor Ahmed
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (18)
  • [2] Potential of energy savings and CO2 emission reduction in China's iron and steel industry
    An, Runying
    Yu, Biying
    Li, Ru
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 226 : 862 - 880
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, CHENWORLD STEEL ASS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2021, World Energy Outlook 2021, DOI DOI 10.1787/EC2FD78D-EN
  • [5] Babich A, 2013, STAHL EISEN, V133, P57
  • [6] Sustainable performance-oriented production practices in the Indian iron and steel industry: An empirical investigation
    Bali, Naveen
    Panta, Murali Prasad
    Antelo, Manel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 226 : 379 - 391
  • [7] Beccarello M., 2023, J MANAGEMENT SUSTAIN, V13, P31
  • [8] Bernstein L., 2007, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P104
  • [9] Empirical investigation of barriers and drivers to the adoption of energy conservation measures, energy management practices and energy services in the Swedish iron and steel industry
    Brunke, Jean-Christian
    Johansson, Maria
    Thollander, Patrik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 84 : 509 - 525
  • [10] Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies
    Buechs, Milena
    Bardsley, Nicholas
    Duwe, Sebastian
    [J]. CRITICAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2011, 31 (02) : 285 - 307