A chatbot-based intervention with ELME to improve stress and health-related parameters in a stressed sample: Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

被引:7
作者
Schillings, C. [1 ]
Meissner, D. [2 ]
Erb, B. [2 ]
Schultchen, D. [1 ]
Bendig, E. [3 ]
Pollatos, O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulm Univ, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Ulm, Germany
[2] Ulm Univ, Inst Distributed Syst, Ulm, Germany
[3] Ulm Univ, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Ulm, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH | 2023年 / 5卷
关键词
chatbot; intervention; stress; interoception; mindfulness; digital health; MINDFULNESS-BASED INTERVENTIONS; GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; MENTAL-HEALTH; GERMAN VERSION; INTEROCEPTION; DEPRESSION; TECHNOLOGY; INVENTORY; ACCURACY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.3389/fdgth.2023.1046202
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundStress levels in the general population had already been increasing in recent years, and have subsequently been exacerbated by the global pandemic. One approach for innovative online-based interventions are "chatbots" - computer programs that can simulate a text-based interaction with human users via a conversational interface. Research on the efficacy of chatbot-based interventions in the context of mental health is sparse. The present study is designed to investigate the effects of a three-week chatbot-based intervention with the chatbot ELME, aiming to reduce stress and to improve various health-related parameters in a stressed sample.MethodsIn this multicenter, two-armed randomised controlled trial with a parallel design, a three-week chatbot-based intervention group including two daily interactive intervention sessions via smartphone (a 10-20 min.) is compared to a treatment-as-usual control group. A total of 130 adult participants with a medium to high stress levels will be recruited in Germany. Assessments will take place pre-intervention, post-intervention (after three weeks), and follow-up (after six weeks). The primary outcome is perceived stress. Secondary outcomes include self-reported interoceptive accuracy, mindfulness, anxiety, depression, personality, emotion regulation, psychological well-being, stress mindset, intervention credibility and expectancies, affinity for technology, and attitudes towards artificial intelligence. During the intervention, participants undergo ecological momentary assessments. Furthermore, satisfaction with the intervention, the usability of the chatbot, potential negative effects of the intervention, adherence, potential dropout reasons, and open feedback questions regarding the chatbot are assessed post-intervention.DiscussionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first chatbot-based intervention addressing interoception, as well as in the context with the target variables stress and mindfulness. The design of the present study and the usability of the chatbot were successfully tested in a previous feasibility study. To counteract a low adherence of the chatbot-based intervention, a high guidance by the chatbot, short sessions, individual and flexible time points of the intervention units and the ecological momentary assessments, reminder messages, and the opportunity to postpone single units were implemented.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 135 条
  • [1] An overview of the features of chatbots in mental health: A scoping review
    Abd-alrazaq, Alaa A.
    Alajlani, Mohannad
    Alalwan, Ali Abdallah
    Bewick, Bridgette M.
    Gardner, Peter
    Househ, Mowafa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 132
  • [2] Abdul-Kader SA, 2015, INT J ADV COMPUT SC, V6, P72
  • [3] Emotion Regulation Questionnaire - A German version of the ERQ by Gross and John
    Abler, Birgit
    Kessler, Henrik
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICA, 2009, 55 (03): : 144 - 152
  • [4] Chatbots: History, technology, and applications
    Adamopoulou, Eleni
    Moussiades, Lefteris
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING WITH APPLICATIONS, 2020, 2
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1998, Info Package: Mastering Depression in Primary Care
  • [6] Mental Health Smartphone Apps: Review and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Future Developments
    Bakker, David
    Kazantzis, Nikolaos
    Rickwood, Debra
    Rickard, Nikki
    [J]. JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 3 (01):
  • [7] Ecological momentary interventions for mental health: A scoping review
    Balaskas, Andreas
    Schueller, Stephen M.
    Cox, Anna L.
    Doherty, Gavin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [8] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [9] Preferences for Internet-Based Mental Health Interventions in an Adult Online Sample: Findings From an Online Community Survey
    Batterham, Philip J.
    Calear, Alison L.
    [J]. JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2017, 4 (02):
  • [10] Systematic self-report bias in health data: Impact on estimating cross-sectional and treatment effects
    Bauhoff S.
    [J]. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2011, 11 (1-2) : 44 - 53