Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Inflammation Status Associated with Laparoscopic Surgery and Traditional Open Surgery in Elderly Colon Cancer Patients

被引:0
作者
Kai, Zhe [1 ]
Chen, Zhuming [1 ]
Xu, Huaiwen [1 ]
Chen, Ya [1 ]
Liu, Shaowen [1 ]
Fang, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Anqing Peoples Hosp 1, Anqing 246000, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
laparoscopy; open surgery; elderly; comparison; colon cancer; clinical efficacy; inflammatory factors; POPULATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.23812/j.biol.regul.homeost.agents.20233705.233
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare and analyze clinical efficacy and inflammation status of elderly patients with colon cancer (CC) treated with laparoscopy and those treated with traditional open surgery.Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective trial. A total of 128 elderly patients with CC diagnosed in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 who were scheduled for surgical treatment were recruited as initial subjects. After excluding those who did not meet the inclusion criteria, 122 patients were finally enrolled in the study. All patients were assigned to two groups: Experimental group (n = 62) and traditional group (n = 60), based on surgical method used. The traditional group underwent traditional open surgery, while the observation group received laparoscopic surgery. The general data of all patients were collected, and the perioperative indices, clinical efficacy, changes in inflammatory factor levels, and occurrence of complications the two groups were compared.Results: The size of surgical incisions, intraoperative blood loss, recovery time of gastrointestinal function, time lapse before eating, time lag before flatulence, time lag before getting out of bed, and hospitalization time were lower in the experimental group than in the traditional group (p > 0.05). The experimental group presented markedly higher total clinical efficiency than the traditional group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in levels of inflammatory factors between the two groups before therapy (p > 0.05). However, after therapy, the experimental group presented lower levels of CRP (C-reactive protein), IL-6 (interleukin 6) and TNF-& alpha; (tumor necrosis factor-& alpha;) levels, and lower incidence of complications than the traditional group (p < 0.05).Conclusions: For elderly patients with colon cancer, laparoscopic surgery effectively lowered the levels of inflammatory factors, decreased the probability of complications and provided better safety, thereby offering better clinical efficacy, less trauma and better perioperative conditions than traditional open surgery. Therefore, laparoscopic surgery has highly beneficial potential for clinical application in elderly CC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2371 / 2376
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Colorectal carcinoma: Laparoscopic versus traditional open surgery. A clinical trial
    Santoro, E
    Carlini, M
    Carboni, F
    Feroce, A
    [J]. HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 46 (26) : 900 - 904
  • [32] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 colon cancer: evaluation of margin status
    Elnahas, Ahmad
    Sunil, Supreet
    Jackson, Timothy D.
    Okrainec, Allan
    Quereshy, Fayez A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (04): : 1491 - 1496
  • [33] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 colon cancer: evaluation of margin status
    Ahmad Elnahas
    Supreet Sunil
    Timothy D. Jackson
    Allan Okrainec
    Fayez A. Quereshy
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 1491 - 1496
  • [34] Laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery in obese patients: Comparison to open surgery
    Fazeli-Matin, S
    Gill, IS
    Hsu, THS
    Sung, GT
    Novick, AC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (03) : 665 - 669
  • [35] Laparoscopic surgery in patients diagnosed with clinical N2 colon cancer
    Numata, Masakatsu
    Sawazaki, Sho
    Aoyama, Toru
    Tamagawa, Hiroshi
    Godai, Teni
    Sato, Tsutomu
    Saeki, Hiroyuki
    Saigusa, Yusuke
    Taguri, Masataka
    Mushiake, Hiroyuki
    Oshima, Takashi
    Yukawa, Norio
    Shiozawa, Manabu
    Masuda, Munetaka
    Rino, Yasushi
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2019, 49 (06) : 507 - 512
  • [36] Laparoscopic surgery in patients diagnosed with clinical N2 colon cancer
    Masakatsu Numata
    Sho Sawazaki
    Toru Aoyama
    Hiroshi Tamagawa
    Teni Godai
    Tsutomu Sato
    Hiroyuki Saeki
    Yusuke Saigusa
    Masataka Taguri
    Hiroyuki Mushiake
    Takashi Oshima
    Norio Yukawa
    Manabu Shiozawa
    Munetaka Masuda
    Yasushi Rino
    [J]. Surgery Today, 2019, 49 : 507 - 512
  • [37] Outcomes of open versus laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer
    Quintana, Jos M.
    Anton-Ladislao, Ane
    Lazaro, Santiago
    Gonzalez, Nerea
    Bare, Marisa
    Fernandez de Larrea, Nerea
    Redondo, Maximino
    Briones, Eduardo
    Escobar, Antonio
    Sarasqueta, Cristina
    Garcia-Gutierrez, Susana
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (01) : 99 - 103
  • [38] Outcomes of open versus laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer
    José M. Quintana
    Ane Anton-Ladislao
    Santiago Lázaro
    Nerea Gonzalez
    Marisa Bare
    Nerea Fernandez de Larrea
    Maximino Redondo
    Eduardo Briones
    Antonio Escobar
    Cristina Sarasqueta
    Susana Garcia-Gutierrez
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2018, 33 : 99 - 103
  • [39] Comparison of the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon perforation during colonoscopy
    Kim, Jeongsoo
    Lee, Gil Jae
    Baek, Jeong-Heum
    Lee, Won-Suk
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2014, 87 (03) : 139 - 143
  • [40] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic and open surgery for the correction of retrocaval ureter
    Mao, Lijun
    Xu, Kai
    Ding, Meng
    Pan, Jun
    Guo, Zhicheng
    [J]. THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2017, 13 : 697 - 701