Collective payments for ecosystem services: a counterpart of commodification and privatization trends in nature conservation?

被引:9
|
作者
Kaiser, Josef [1 ]
Haase, Dagmar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Krueger, Tobias [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Geog, Berlin, Germany
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Integrat Res Inst Transformat Human Environm Syst, Berlin, Germany
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2023年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
collective action; collective payments for ecosystem services; commodification; community-based payments for ecosystem services; environmental governance; land tenure; privatization; property; PROPERTY-RIGHTS REGIMES; COMMUNITY-BASED PAYMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; COMMON PROPERTY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; PROTECTED AREAS; PES; EQUITY; BIODIVERSITY; DEFINITIONS;
D O I
10.5751/ES-13549-280113
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Payments for ecosystem services (PES) gained an increasing importance in science and politics within the last decades. Although the enthusiasm about PES is particularly high in Environmental Economics, opponents criticize the market-based character of PES and the associated commodification as well as privatization trends. By means of a systematic literature review we aim at shedding light on the complex and controversial debate about how to define commodification and related privatization processes and how they are linked to PES outcomes. We do so by setting a particular focus on the potentials and challenges of community-based and collective PES (C-PES), also in contrast to PES targeting land under private land tenure (P-PES). Our results reveal that C-PES show promising results when targeting local communities with a high level of social capital. However, there is a lack of studies that systematically assess the relations between different degrees of commodification and the ecological and social outcome of PES programs. For this reason, we provide a new conceptual framework of commodification by highlighting two interrelated spheres, where PES-related commodification processes take place: The first sphere relates to the commodification of ES-providing land, which greatly depends on the land tenure regime in place. The second sphere addresses the commodification of ecosystem services (ES). Our review indicates that C-PES show rather low degrees of commodification in the first sphere because the ES-providing land is often less embedded into private land markets. This is due to often missing alienation rights, more complex decision-making processes, and a potentially lower profit-orientation of the landowners. Empirical long-term studies are needed to investigate changes in both spheres of commodification over time, their potential interactions, and how they affect the outcome of C-PES and P-PES programs.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global patterns of collective payments for ecosystem services and their degrees of commodification
    Kaiser, Josef
    Krueger, Tobias
    Haase, Dagmar
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 209
  • [2] Payments for Ecosystem Services as Incentives for Collective Action
    Muradian, Roldan
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 26 (10) : 1155 - 1169
  • [3] How to achieve fairness in payments for ecosystem services? Insights from agrobiodiversity conservation auctions
    Narloch, Ulf
    Pascual, Unai
    Drucker, Adam G.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 35 : 107 - 118
  • [4] Increasing the impact of collective incentives in payments for ecosystem services
    Kaczan, David
    Pfaff, Alexander
    Rodriguez, Luz
    Shapiro-Garza, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 86 : 48 - 67
  • [5] Payments for ecosystem services and the financing of global biodiversity conservation
    Hein, Lars
    Miller, Daniel C.
    de Groot, Rudolf
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [6] Making Nature Valuable, Not Profitable: Are Payments for Ecosystem Services Suitable for Degrowth?
    Muniz, Rodrigo
    Cruz, Maria Joao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (08) : 10895 - 10921
  • [7] Payments for ecosystem services or collective stewardship of Mother Earth? Applying deliberative valuation in an indigenous community in Colombia
    Lliso, Bosco
    Pascual, Unai
    Engel, Stefanie
    Mariel, Petr
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 169
  • [8] Evidence of Payments for Ecosystem Services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods
    Ingram, Jane Carter
    Wilkie, David
    Clements, Tom
    Balas McNab, Roan
    Nelson, Fred
    Hogan Baur, Erick
    Sachedina, Hassanali T.
    Peterson, David Dean
    Foley, Charles Andrew Harold
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 7 : 10 - 21
  • [9] The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services
    Salzman, James
    Bennett, Genevieve
    Carroll, Nathaniel
    Goldstein, Allie
    Jenkins, Michael
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (03): : 136 - 144
  • [10] Community-based incentive coordination in payments for ecosystem services: China's Wolong Nature Reserve
    Sheng, Jichuan
    Wang, Hui
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 68 (06) : 1213 - 1237