IS CAUSALITY ADMISSIBLE IN PHENOMENOLOGY? A CORRECTIVE TO EDMUND HUSSERL'S IDEA

被引：2

作者：

Kirsberg, Igor W. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] HSE Univ, Fac Humanities, Sch Philosophy & Cultural Studies, Pokrovskiy Bulvar 11, Moscow 109028, Russia

来源：

PHAINOMENA | 2023年 / 32卷 / 124-125期

关键词：

phenomenology; causality; science; difference between thought and feeling;

D O I：

10.32022/PHI32.2023.124-125.9

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

The article rejects the traditional limitation of causality in phenomenology and attempts to demonstrate the mistakes in Edmund Husserl's arguments for such an understanding, which limited natural causality to the empirical world and confused both natural as well as motivational causality with logical and psychological connections. The specificity of causality is stressed, in order to clarify the main structures of pure consciousness-thought, feeling, and will-as well as to elucidate the mutual irreducibility of connections and interactions between them. Thus, phenomenology altogether can be outlined as being compatible with scientific discipline.

引用

页码：203 / 220

页数：24

共 25 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1924, GRUNDZUGE LEBENSPSYC

[2]

Erismann Theodor, 1924, EIGENART GEISTIGEN

[3]

Guyer P., 1998, CRITIQUE PURE REASON

[4]

Husserl E., 1970, CRISIS EUROPEAN SCI, DOI DOI 10.3389/FPSYT.2018.00466

[5]

Husserl E., 2001, ANAL PASSIVE ACTIVE

[6]

Husserl E., 1901, LOGISCHE UNTERSUCHUN, V2nd

[7]

Husserl E., 1989, Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: second book

[8]

Husserl E., 1980, Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, Third Book. Phenomenology and the Foundation of the Sciences

[9]

Husserl Edmund, 1976, KRISIS DEREUROPAISCH

[10]

Husserl Edmund., 1970, Logical Investigations

← 1 2 3 →