HOW DIFFERENT ARE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS? EMPIRICAL TYPOLOGY OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

被引:0
作者
Kadak, Tarmo [1 ]
Laitinen, Erkki K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ Technol, Ctr Accounting, Sch Business & Governance, Dept Business Adm, Ehitajate tee 5, EE-19086 Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Univ Vaasa, Sch Accounting & Finance, ACA Res Grp, POB 700, Vaasa 65100, Finland
关键词
Performance Management Systems (PMS); cluster analysis; key success factors; clus; ters of PMS; hierarchy levels; strategy focus; BALANCED SCORECARD; BUSINESS; SUCCESS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3846/jbem.2023.19248
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of the research is to extract an empirical typology presenting the diverse types of PMSs. For creating empirical typology, a Two-Step cluster analysis was applied. The types of PMSs are characterized by the variables extracted from the chain model found in the literature. We discovered two relevant dimensions specifying the PMSs: the importance of strategy for the firms and the multitude of organizational levels. Based on these, we extracted four clusters (types) of PMS along the dimensions of strategy focusing and organizational level. The findings show that the most advanced PMSs are found in the Strategy-focused Multi-level cluster, before the Strategyfocused One-level cluster. We also linked the dimensions within the four aspects of PMSs: strategic, alignment and process, usage, and information aspects. We found that the expected success of PMSs is positively related to the strategy-focus and multiplicity of levels. These findings broaden the common typologies of PMS and add the intrinsic features of the firm to the types of PMS reflecting strategy orientation and the multitude of hierarchy levels of the firm.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 386
页数:19
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Alach Z, 2017, KOTUITUI, V12, P56, DOI 10.1080/1177083X.2016.1225579
[2]  
Anthony R.N., 2003, MANAGEMENT CONTROL S, V11th
[3]   Key factors for operational performance in manufacturing systems: Conceptual model, systematic literature review and implications [J].
Battesini, Marcelo ;
ten Caten, Carla Schwengber ;
de Jesus Pacheco, Diego Augusto .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2021, 60 :265-282
[4]  
Bedford D.S., 2008, J APPL MANAGEMENT AC, V6, P17
[5]   A survey of clustering algorithms for an industrial context [J].
Benabdellah, Abla Chaouni ;
Benghabrit, Asmaa ;
Bouhaddou, Imane .
SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTING IN DATA SCIENCES (ICDS2018), 2019, 148 :291-302
[6]   Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems [J].
Bourne, M ;
Mills, J ;
Wilcox, M ;
Neely, A ;
Platts, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (07) :754-771
[7]  
Bourne M., 2003, Measuring Business Excellence, V7, P15, DOI DOI 10.1108/13683040310496462
[8]   Performance measurement: learning from the past and projecting the future [J].
Bourne, Mike .
MEASURING BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2008, 12 (04) :67-72
[9]   Effect of perceived conflict among multiple performance goals and goal difficulty on task performance [J].
Cheng, Mandy M. ;
Luckett, Peter F. ;
Mahama, Habib .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2007, 47 (02) :221-242
[10]   The fundamentals of performance measurement systems: A systematic approach to theory and a research agenda [J].
Choong, Kwee Keong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 63 (07) :879-922