Genome-wide association studies for epistatic genetic effects on fertility and reproduction traits in Holstein cattle

被引:7
作者
Alves, Kristen [1 ,2 ]
Brito, Luiz F. F. [1 ,3 ]
Sargolzaei, Mehdi [1 ]
Schenkel, Flavio S. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Ctr Genet Improvement Livestock, Dept Anim Biosci, 50 Stone Rd East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Bayer CropSci Inc, Guelph, ON, Canada
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Anim Sci, W Lafayette, IN USA
关键词
epistasis; GWAS; MAPIT; non-additive genetic effects; MISSING HERITABILITY; FINNISH AYRSHIRE; LOCI; SCAN;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12813
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Non-additive genetic effects are well known to play an important role in the phenotypic expression of complex traits, such as fertility and reproduction. In this study, a genome scan was performed using 41,640 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers to identify genomic regions associated with epistatic (additive-by-additive) effects in fertility and reproduction traits in Holstein cattle. Nine fertility and reproduction traits were analysed on 5825 and 6090 Holstein heifers and cows with phenotypes and genotypes, respectively. The Marginal Epistasis Test (MAPIT) was used to identify SNPs with significant marginal epistatic effects at a chromosome-wise 5% and 10% false discovery rate (FDR) level. The -log(10)(p) values were adjusted by the genomic inflation factor (?) to correct for the potential bias on the p-values and minimize the possible effects of population stratification. After adjustments, MAPIT enabled the identification of genomic regions with significant marginal epistatic effects for heifers on BTA5 for age at first insemination, BTA3 and BTA24 for non-return rate (NRR); BTA16 and BTA28 for gestation length (GL); BTA1, BTA4 and BTA17 for stillbirth (SB). For the cow traits, MAPIT enabled the identification of regions on BTA11 for GL, BTA11 and BTA16 for SB and BTA19 for calf size (CZ). An additional approach for mapping epistasis in a genome-wide association study was also proposed, in which the genome scan was performed using estimates of epistatic values as the input pseudo-phenotypes, computed using single-trait animal models. Significant SNPs were identified at the chromosome-wise 5% and 10% FDR levels for all traits. For the heifer traits, significant regions were found on BTA7 for AFS; BTA12 for NRR; BTA14 and BTA19 for GL; BTA19 for calving ease (CE); BTA5, BTA24, BTA25 and in the X chromosome for SB; BTA23 and in the X chromosome for CZ and in the X chromosome for the number of services (NS). For the cow traits, significant regions were found on BTA29 and in the X chromosome for NRR, BTA11, BTA16 and in the X chromosome for SB, BTA2 for GL, BTA28 for CZ, BTA19 for calving to first insemination, and in the X chromosome for NS and first insemination to conception. The results suggest that the epistatic genetic effects are likely due to many loci with a small effect rather than few loci with a large effect and/or a single SNP marker alone do not capture the epistatic effects well. The genomic architecture of fertility and reproduction traits is complex, and these results should be validated in independent dairy cattle populations and using alternative statistical models.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 637
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]   Genomic control for association studies [J].
Devlin, B ;
Roeder, K .
BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (04) :997-1004
[12]   Computing the distribution of quadratic forms: Further comparisons between the Liu-Tang-Zhang approximation and exact methods [J].
Duchesne, Pierre ;
De Micheaux, Pierre Lafaye .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2010, 54 (04) :858-862
[13]   Genome-Wide Association Studies: Contribution of Genomics to Understanding Blood Pressure and Essential Hypertension [J].
Ehret, Georg B. .
CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2010, 12 (01) :17-25
[14]   VIEWPOINT Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease [J].
Eichler, Evan E. ;
Flint, Jonathan ;
Gibson, Greg ;
Kong, Augustine ;
Leal, Suzanne M. ;
Moore, Jason H. ;
Nadeau, Joseph H. .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2010, 11 (06) :446-450
[15]  
Falconer D. S., 1996, Introduction to quantitative genetics.
[16]  
Gilmour A.R., 2015, ASReml User Guide Release 4.1 Structural Specification
[17]  
Greenland S., 2008, Modern Epidemiology, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ANNEMERGMED.2008.06.461
[18]   BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION OF NONADDITIVE GENETIC MERITS IN NONINBRED POPULATIONS [J].
HENDERSON, CR .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1985, 60 (01) :111-117
[19]   Population Stratification and Patterns of Linkage Disequilibrium [J].
Hinrichs, Anthony L. ;
Larkin, Emma K. ;
Suarez, Brian K. .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 33 :S88-S92
[20]   Developmental progress and current status of the Animal QTLdb [J].
Hu, Zhi-Liang ;
Park, Carissa A. ;
Reecy, James M. .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2016, 44 (D1) :D827-D833