Rural age-friendly ecosystems for older adults: An international scoping review with recommendations to support age-friendly communities

被引:6
作者
Liebzeit, Daniel [1 ,5 ]
Krupp, Anna [1 ]
Bunch, Jacinda [1 ]
Tonelli, Shalome [1 ]
Griffin, Emily [1 ]
McVeigh, Sarah [1 ]
Chi, Nai-Ching [1 ]
Jaboob, Saida [1 ]
Nakad, Lynn [1 ]
Arbaje, Alicia I. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Buck, Harleah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Nursing, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Ctr Transformat Geriatr Res, Dept Med, Div Geriatr Med & Gerontol,Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Armstrong Inst, Sch Med, Ctr Hlth Care Human Factors, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ Iowa, Coll Nursing, 50 Newton Rd, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
community health services; delivery of healthcare; healthy aging; rural health services; rural population; PERSON-ENVIRONMENT FIT; PEOPLE; FRAMEWORK; CARE; PERSPECTIVES; PERCEPTIONS; INDICATORS; VIEWPOINT; POLICIES; CANADA;
D O I
10.1002/hsr2.1241
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background and AimsThe population of older adults in rural areas is rising, and they experience higher rates of poverty and chronic illness, have poorer health behaviors, and experience different challenges than those in urban areas. This scoping review seeks to (1) map the state of the science of age-friendly systems in rural areas regarding structural characteristics, processes for delivering age-friendly practices, and outcomes of age-friendly systems, (2) analyze strengths, weakness, opportunities, and threats of age-friendly system implementation, and (3) make person, practice, and policy-level recommendations to support active aging and development of age-friendly communities. MethodsAn international scoping review was conducted of articles that used age-friendly framing, had a sample age of 45 years of age or older, self-identified as rural, and reported empiric data. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, AgeLine, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Scopus, and Academic Search Elite on October 26, 2021, and rerun March 10, 2023. Data were charted across three analytic layers: socioecological model, Donabedian's framework, and SWOT analysis. ResultsResults reveal limited data on outcomes relevant to organizations, such as return on investment or healthcare utilization. While the SWOT analysis revealed many strengths of age-friendly systems, including their impact on persons' outcomes, it also revealed several weaknesses, threats, and gaps. Namely, age-friendly systems have weaknesses due to reliance on trained volunteers and staff, communication, and teamwork. System-level threats include community and health system barriers, and challenges in poor/developing areas. ConclusionsWhile age-friendly systems in this review were heterogeneous, there is an opportunity to focus on unifying elements including the World Health Organization age-friendly cities framework or 4Ms framework for age-friendly care. Despite the many benefits of age-friendly systems, we must acknowledge limitations of the evidence base, pursue opportunities to examine organizational metrics to support implementation and sustainability of age-friendly systems, and leverage improvements in age-friendliness at a community level.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [91] Examining collaboration across organizations in an age-friendly community
    Teixeira-Poit, Stephanie M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMEN & AGING, 2020, 32 (01) : 91 - 113
  • [92] Teoli D., 2021, SWOT ANAL
  • [93] Using the 4M framework of the Age-Friendly Health System to improve MIPS documentation in primary care clinics: A quality improvement study
    Tewary, Sweta
    Cook, Nicole
    Pandya, Naushira
    Damier, Sashah
    Shnayder, Oksana
    Dezine, Marie
    [J]. GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION, 2023, 44 (04) : 631 - 640
  • [94] The WHO age-friendly cities framework, AG FRIENDL WORLD
  • [95] The world bank, 2022, POP AG 65
  • [96] 'The village as a coat'; changes in the person-environment fit for older people in a rural area in The Netherlands
    Thissen, Frans
    Fortuijn, Joos Droogleever
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2021, 87 : 431 - 443
  • [97] van den Berg A., 2019, INT PRACTICE DEV J, V9, P1, DOI [10.19043/ipdj.92.002, DOI 10.19043/IPDJ.92.002]
  • [98] How older people experience the age-friendliness of The Hague: A quantitative study
    van Hoof, Joost
    van den Hoven, Rudy F. M.
    Hess, Moritz
    van Staalduinen, Willeke H.
    Hulsebosch-Janssen, Loes M. T.
    Dikken, Jeroen
    [J]. CITIES, 2022, 124
  • [99] Exploring the Impact of Informal Practices on Social Exclusion and Age-Friendliness for Older People in Rural Communities
    Walsh, Kieran
    O'Shea, Eamon
    Scharf, Thomas
    Shucksmith, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 24 (01) : 37 - 49
  • [100] Applying WHO's Age-Friendly Communities Framework to a National Survey in China
    Wang, Yi
    Gonzales, Ernest
    Morrow-Howell, Nancy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIAL WORK, 2017, 60 (03): : 215 - 231