Gender differences in tuberculosis incidence rates-A pooled analysis of data from seven high-income countries by age group and time period

被引:12
作者
Peer, Victoria [1 ]
Schwartz, Naama [1 ]
Green, Manfred S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Sch Publ Hlth, Haifa, Israel
关键词
tuberculosis; sex differences; gender; meta-analysis; meta-regression; male-to-female; incidence rate ratio; SEX-BASED DIFFERENCES; PULMONARY TUBERCULOSIS; BCG VACCINATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; CHILDREN; IMMUNITY; TRENDS; BIRTH;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.997025
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
IntroductionGender differences in the incidence rates for tuberculosis are occasionally reported. However, the magnitude and consistency of the differences by age group, among different populations, and over extended periods of time are not clear. Materials and methodsWe obtained national data from seven countries from open-access internet sites or personal communications with official representatives. We computed the male-to-female incidence rate ratios (IRRs) by country and year for every age group and pooled these ratios using meta-analytic methods. Meta-regression analysis was performed to estimate the contribution of age, country, and calendar years to the variation in the IRRs. ResultsIn the age groups of < 1, 1-4, 5-9, and 10-14, the pooled male-to-female IRRs (with 95% CI) were as follows: 1.21 (1.05, 1.40), 0.99 (0.95, 1.04), 1.01 (0.96, 1.06), and 0.83 (0.77, 0.89), respectively. In the age groups 15-44, 45-64, and 65+ years, incidence rates were significantly higher in men, with IRRs of 1.25 (1.16, 1.35), 1.79 (1.56, 2.06), and 1.81 (1.66, 1.96), respectively. Meta-regression analysis revealed that age significantly contributed to the variation in the IRRs. ConclusionsThere were gender differences in the incidence rates for tuberculosis, with higher rates in boys aged less than one, no significant differences in boys of ages 1-9, and higher rates in boys/men older than 15. The only excess in female gender was in the age group 10-14 years. The age-related gender differences in tuberculosis incidence rates observed over several countries indicate the importance of including sex as a biological variable when assessing the risk factors for tuberculosis.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [21] The X-files in immunity: sex-based differences predispose immune responses
    Fish, Eleanor N.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS IMMUNOLOGY, 2008, 8 (09) : 737 - 744
  • [22] German Federal Health Monitoring System, US
  • [23] Gilbert RL, 2009, INT J TUBERC LUNG D, V13, P645
  • [24] A meta-analytic evaluation of sex differences in meningococcal disease incidence rates in 10 countries
    Green, Manfred S.
    Schwartz, Naama
    Peer, Victoria
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2020, 148
  • [25] Sex differences in campylobacteriosis incidence rates at different ages-a seven country, multi-year, meta-analysis. A potential mechanism for the infection
    Green, Manfred S.
    Schwartz, Naama
    Peer, Victoria
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [26] The differential impact of HIV and antiretroviral therapy on gender-specific tuberculosis rates
    Hermans, Sabine
    Cornell, Morna
    Middelkoop, Keren
    Wood, Robin
    [J]. TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2019, 24 (04) : 454 - 462
  • [27] Sex differences in tuberculosis
    Hertz, David
    Schneider, Bianca
    [J]. SEMINARS IN IMMUNOPATHOLOGY, 2019, 41 (02) : 225 - 237
  • [28] Risk for latent and active tuberculosis in Germany
    Herzmann, Christian
    Sotgiu, Giovanni
    Bellinger, Oswald
    Diel, Roland
    Gerdes, Silke
    Goetsch, Udo
    Heykes-Uden, Helga
    Schaberg, Tom
    Lange, Christoph
    [J]. INFECTION, 2017, 45 (03) : 283 - 290
  • [29] Holmes CB, 1998, INT J TUBERC LUNG D, V2, P96
  • [30] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Social Contact Patterns and Implications for Tuberculosis Transmission and Control
    Horton, Katherine C.
    Hoey, Anne L.
    Beraud, Guillaume
    Corbett, Elizabeth L.
    White, Richard G.
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 26 (05) : 910 - 919