Transverse division of the rectus abdominis muscle in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap elevation: A rescue technique to include more than one perforator

被引:0
|
作者
Choi, Jong Yun [1 ]
Kim, Jun Nyeon [1 ]
Lee, Chae Rim [1 ]
Choi, Jangyoun [1 ]
Moon, Suk-Ho [1 ]
Jun, Young Joon [1 ]
Oh, Deuk Young [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
FREE TRAM; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; DIEP; MORBIDITY; STRENGTH; HARVEST;
D O I
10.1002/micr.31169
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIt is important to include as many perforators as possible in order to enhance the vascularity of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. However, the rectus muscle must be transected transversely, which prevents suturing and can cause a defect along the same line as the muscle-sparing procedure. When harvesting the DIEP flap, no specific method was suggested to solve these muscle defects. We found that by transecting the rectus muscle transversely, the muscle could be sutured in the tendinous area more easily while maintaining muscle function. The purpose of this study is to confirm the long-term recovery of the rectus abdominis muscle through the volume change after DIEP flap using this tendinous transection and suture method.Patients and MethodsA retrospective review of 28 patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap and the tendinous transection method for multiple perforators between May 2018 and April 2020 was conducted. The preoperative and postoperative volumes of the rectus abdominis muscle were estimated both the harvest and opposite sides.ResultsThe preoperative and postoperative muscle volumes from the harvest side were 50.08 +/- 8.71 cm3 and 48.56 +/- 8.61 cm3, respectively. The volume difference was 1.522 cm3 decrease, which was not statistically significant (p = .070). The preoperative and postoperative muscle volumes from the opposite side were 50.50 +/- 8.15 cm3 and 50.08 +/- 8.18 cm3, respectively. The volume difference was 0.434 cm3 increase and was not statistically significant (p = .064). Postoperative volume changes in the rectus muscle were not statistically significant on either side.ConclusionThe tendinous transection method in the DIEP flap procedure did not significantly affect postoperative rectus muscle volume. Therefore, we expect this harvest method to allow DIEP flap reconstruction that includes multiple perforators and complete donor muscle recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [31] Surgical Considerations of One-Stage Reconstruction of Large Extremity Defects Using a Thin Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap
    Lee, Seung Yeol
    Seok, Moon Chul
    Park, Bo Young
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2023, 50 (06): : 586 - 592
  • [32] Higher body mass index is a more important risk factor than sarcopenia for complications in reconstruction of the deep inferior epigastric perforator
    Yoshino, Maho
    Oda, Goshi
    Nakagawa, Tsuyoshi
    Uemura, Noriko
    Mori, Hiroki
    Mori, Mio
    Fujioka, Tomoyuki
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (01) : 360 - 366
  • [33] Progression of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction Technique at a Dedicated New Zealand Tertiary Plastic Surgery Unit: a Case Series Analysis
    Law, Stacey
    Moazzam, Amber
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 86 (01) : 117 - 123
  • [34] Considering the Optimal Timing of Breast Reconstruction With Abdominal Flaps With Adjuvant Irradiation in 370 Consecutive Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap and Free Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Performed in a Chinese Oncology Center Is There a Significant Difference Between Immediate and Delayed?
    He, Shanshan
    Yin, Jian
    Robb, Geoffrey L.
    Sun, Jingyan
    Zhang, Xuehui
    Li, Haixin
    Liu, Jing
    Han, Chunyong
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 78 (06) : 633 - 640
  • [35] Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Thoracic Epidural for Postoperative Analgesia After Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Clary, Zachary
    Nazir, Niaman
    Butterworth, James
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 (06) : E24 - E26
  • [36] Perforator Phase Contrast Angiography of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforators: A Better Preoperative Imaging Tool for Flap Surgery than Computed Tomographic Angiography?
    Yang, Xiangyu
    Miller, Michael J.
    Friel, Harry T.
    Slijepcevic, Allison
    Knopp, Michael V.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2017, 52 (06) : 334 - 342
  • [37] Pre-operative Radiotherapy And Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEP) flAp study (PRADA): Aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction at one year
    Godden, Amy R.
    Micha, Aikaterini
    O'Connell, Rachel L.
    Mohammed, Kabir
    Kirby, Anna M.
    Thiruchelvam, Paul T. R.
    Leff, Daniel R.
    MacNeill, Fiona A.
    Rusby, Jennifer E.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2023, 78 : 19 - 28
  • [38] Progression of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction Technique at a Dedicated New Zealand Tertiary Plastic Surgery Unit: a Case Series Analysis
    Stacey Law
    Amber Moazzam
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2024, 86 : 117 - 123
  • [39] Rezoning Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flaps Based on Perforasome Groupings and a New Understanding of the Vascular Architecture of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery-Based Flaps
    Tan, Jialiang
    Ohjimi, Hiroyuki
    Takagi, Satoshi
    Kawakami, Yoshihisa
    Eto, Akiko
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 83 (06) : E59 - E67
  • [40] Comparison of local anesthetic infusion pump bupivacaine versus transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block liposomal bupivacaine for pain management after bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator free flap reconstruction
    Knackstedt, Rebecca
    Gatherwright, James
    Ghaznavi, Amir
    Bernard, Steven
    Schwarz, Graham
    Moreira, Andrea
    Gurunluoglu, Raffi
    Djohan, Risal
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2017, 70 (12) : 1779 - 1781