Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in bronchoscopic sedation: A meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Zhou, Ying [1 ]
Zhao, Cheng [2 ]
Tang, Yi-Xun [1 ]
Liu, Ji-Tong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Normal Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Hunan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Changsha 410005, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhangjiajie Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Zhangjiajie 427000, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Normal Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Hunan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 61 Jiefang East Rd, Changsha 410005, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Remimazolam; Bronchoscopy; Procedural sedation; Meta-analysis; MODERATE SEDATION; FLEXIBLE BRONCHOSCOPY; ANESTHESIA; PROPOFOL;
D O I
10.12998/wjcc.v12.i6.1120
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Remimazolam is a new benzodiazepine used for procedural sedation and general anesthesia. Several studies have used remimazolam for bendable bronchoscopy. AIM To assess the safety and efficacy of remimazolam for sedation in patients undergoing bendable bronchoscopy by performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for RCTs on bendable bronchoscopic procedural sedation with remimazolam vs conventional sedatives (CS). RESULTS Five studies with 1080 cases were included. Remimazolam had the same sedation success rate compared with CS [relative risk (RR): 1.35, 95%CI: 0.60-3.05, P = 0.474, I-2 = 99.6%]. However, remimazolam was associated with a lower incidence of hypotension (RR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.40-0.95, P = 0.027; I-2 = 65.1%) and a lower incidence of respiratory depression (RR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.33-0.77, P = 0.002, I-2 = 42.3%). A subgroup analysis showed a higher success rate of sedation with remimazolam than midazolam (RR: 2.45, 95%CI: 1.76-3.42, P < 0.001). Compared with propofol, the incidence of hypotension (RR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0.32-0.64, P < 0.001, I-2 = 0.0%), respiratory depression (RR: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.30-0.76, P = 0.002, I-2 = 78.4%), hypoxemia (RR: 0.36, 95%CI: 0.15-0.87, P = 0.023), and injection pain (RR: 0.04, 95%CI: 0.01-0.28, P = 0.001) were lower. CONCLUSION Remimazolam is safe and effective during bronchoscopy. The sedation success rate was similar to that in the CS group. However, remimazolam has a higher safety profile, with fewer inhibitory effects on respiration and circulation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The comparison of remimazolam and midazolam for the sedation of gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Zhang, Lin
    Li, Chun
    Zhao, Chuncheng
    You, Yulai
    Xu, Jian
    AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 22 (02) : 384 - 391
  • [32] Evaluation of efficacy and safety of propofol in the treatment of procedural sedation/anesthesia in neonates A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Pei-Xia
    Bo, Li-Jun
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (37)
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of sedation with dexmedetomidine in critical care patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Constantin, Jean-Michel
    Momon, Aurelien
    Mantz, Jean
    Payen, Jean-Francois
    De Jonghe, Bernard
    Perbet, Sebastien
    Cayot, Sophie
    Chanques, Gerald
    Perreira, Bruno
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [34] Remimazolam versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy within elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wania Ahmer
    Sahar Imtiaz
    Daniyal Muhammad Alam
    Khadija Ahmed
    Barka Sajid
    Juvairia Yousuf
    Sunny Asnani
    Muhammad Ahmed Ali Fahim
    Rahmeen Ali
    Marium Mansoor
    Muhammad Talha Safdar
    Muhammad Umair Anjum
    Muhammad Hasanain
    Muhammad Omar Larik
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2024, 80 : 493 - 503
  • [35] Efficacy and Safety Profile of Remimazolam for Sedation in Adults Undergoing Short Surgical Procedures
    Morimoto, Yasuhiro
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2022, 18 : 95 - 100
  • [36] The efficacy of fentanyl supplementation for the sedation of bronchoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Dan
    Ye, Yulan
    Deng, Shukai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (08): : 9559 - 9565
  • [37] Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis
    Fan, Shunyi
    Zhu, Yun
    Sui, Changzhong
    Li, Qian
    Jiang, Wenxin
    Zhang, Li
    PAIN AND THERAPY, 2023, 12 (03) : 695 - 706
  • [38] Remimazolam: A Retrospective Study of Initial Safety and Recovery Data in Diverse Procedural Sedation
    Johnson, Kelsey L.
    Meyers, Jennifer S.
    Mortensen, Genna N.
    Steege, Jenna R.
    Mara, Kristin C.
    Brinkman, Nathan J.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 46 (02) : 90 - 95
  • [39] Comparison of remimazolam and propofol about safety outcome indicators during general anesthesia in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Xueyan
    Wang, Chenghua
    Gao, Hong
    Bai, Xue
    Zhang, Zhongwei
    Chen, Rui
    Huang, Xiang
    An, Li
    Yi, Jing
    Tong, Rui
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (06) : 553 - 564
  • [40] A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for anesthetic induction and non-ICU sedation
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Chen, Jen-Yin
    Wu, Shao-Chun
    Huang, Po-Yu
    Wu, Jheng-Yan
    Liu, Ting-Hui
    Liu, Chien-Cheng
    Chen, I-Wen
    Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14