Clinical Features of Preeclampsia Preceded by Fetal Growth Restriction

被引:3
作者
Iijima, Takayoshi [1 ]
Obata, Soichiro [1 ]
Miyagi, Etsuko [2 ]
Aoki, Shigeru [1 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama City Univ, Med Ctr, Perinatal Ctr Matern & Neonate, Yokohama, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Yokohama, Japan
关键词
pregnancy; preeclampsia; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; gestational hypertension; fetal growth restriction; HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.51275
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: This study aimed to clarify the perinatal prognosis of preeclampsia (PE) with fetal growth restriction (FGR) and determine appropriate medical interventions for these conditions. Methods: Singleton births delivered to mothers diagnosed with PE with FGR and hypertension at a tertiary center between January 2010 and June 2021 were included. Only patients with PE were included in the analysis, and patients with superimposed PE were excluded. The FGR-preceding group (group F) included patients who developed FGR first and had elevated blood pressure. The remaining cases were defined as the hypertension-preceding group (group H). The perinatal outcomes between the two groups were then compared. The primary outcome was pregnancy prolongation defined as the time from PE diagnosis to delivery. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, maternal outcomes, and neonatal outcomes. Results: The mean gestational age at the time of PE diagnosis was 34.7 (26-40.1) weeks for group F and 30.3 (22.6-39.4) weeks for group H (P=0.004). The median pregnancy prolongation from the time of PE diagnosis to delivery was eight (2-30) days in group F and 10.5 (2-43) days in group H, with no significant difference (P=0.52). The incidence of maternal critical complications was 10.4% in group F and 28.1% in group H (P=0.03; odds ratio 3.36; 95% confidence interval 1.13-10). Conclusions: Among patients with PE, group H was more likely to develop serious maternal complications than group F, suggesting different pathogenesis between these types of PE. Both groups required cautious perinatal management, but more stringent maternal management was required for group H.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review [J].
Abalos, Edgardo ;
Cuesta, Cristina ;
Grosso, Ana L. ;
Chou, Doris ;
Say, Lale .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 170 (01) :1-7
[2]   Expectant management of severe preeclampsia with severe fetal growth restriction in the second trimester [J].
Aoki, Shigeru ;
Toma, Rie ;
Kurasawa, Kentaro ;
Okuda, Mika ;
Takahashi, Tsuneo ;
Hirahara, Fumiki .
PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2014, 4 (01) :81-86
[3]  
BROSENS I, 1977, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V84, P656
[4]   The "Great Obstetrical Syndromes" are associated with disorders of deep placentation [J].
Brosens, Ivo ;
Pijnenborg, Robert ;
Vercruysse, Lisbeth ;
Romero, Roberto .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 (03) :193-201
[5]   Etiologic determinants of abruptio placentae [J].
Kramer, MS ;
Usher, RH ;
Pollack, R ;
Boyd, M ;
Usher, S .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (02) :221-226
[6]   Hypertensive Disorders and Severe Obstetric Morbidity in the United States [J].
Kuklina, Elena V. ;
Ayala, Carma ;
Callaghan, William M. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 113 (06) :1299-1306
[7]   Risk and risk estimation of placental abruption [J].
Lindqvist, PG ;
Happach, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2006, 126 (02) :160-164
[8]   Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge [J].
Machado Nardozza, Luciano Marcondes ;
Rabachini Caetano, Ana Carolina ;
Perez Zamarian, Ana Cristina ;
Mazzola, Jaqueline Brandao ;
Silva, Carolina Pacheco ;
Gomes Marcal, Vivian Macedo ;
Lobo, Thalita Frutuoso ;
Peixoto, Alberto Borges ;
Araujo Junior, Edward .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 295 (05) :1061-1077
[9]   Clinical features of fetal growth restriction complicated later by preeclampsia [J].
Mitani, Minoru ;
Matsuda, Yoshio ;
Makino, Yasuo ;
Akizawa, Yoshika ;
Ohta, Hiroaki .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 35 (05) :882-887
[10]   Is vascular biology in preeclampsia better? [J].
Myatt, L. ;
Webster, R. P. .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2009, 7 (03) :375-384