Forecasting Sediment Accumulation in the Southwest Pass with Machine-Learning Models

被引:0
作者
Asborno, Magdalena [1 ,2 ]
Broders, Jacob [1 ]
Mitchell, Kenneth N. [2 ]
Hartman, Michael A. [2 ]
Dunkin, Lauren D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Appl Res Associates Inc, 119 Monument Pl, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
[2] US Army Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Coastal & Hydraul Lab, 3909 Halls Ferry Rd, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
关键词
Waterways; Sediment; Dredging; Machine learning; Timeseries; Multivariate forecasting; RIVER SEDIMENT; LSTM;
D O I
10.1061/JWPED5.WWENG-2009
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Connecting the Mississippi River and the Gulf of Mexico, the Southwest Pass (SWP) is one of the most highly utilized commercial waterways in the United States. Hard-to-predict accumulation of sediments in the SWP affects the access of deep-draft vessels to four of the nation's top 15 ports measured by tonnage. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) spends approximately 100 Million USD annually on dredging operations to maintain SWP at a 14.2-meter (50-ft.) depth. Presently, USACE project managers rely on rules-of-thumb with seasonal river stage trends and thresholds to get 10-14 days of lead time for shoaling conditions at the SWP. This work presents the development of a machine learning modeling framework to increase lead times and accuracy of shoaling forecasts in the SWP. Within a multivariate multistep timeseries forecasting framework, several regression models, input variables, and forecasting days are explored. All multivariate machine learning models outperformed an univariate ARIMA model used as baseline. A multilayered perceptron regressor implemented on a 60-day in-lag scenario was found to be the best model to forecast shoaling in the upcoming 45 days. The proposed model may be applied to forecast dredging needs at other critical waterways.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Abadi M, 2016, arXiv, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1603.04467
  • [2] Past, present and prospect of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) based model for sediment transport prediction
    Afan, Haitham Abdulmohsin
    El-shafie, Ahmed
    Mohtar, Wan Hanna Melini Wan
    Yaseen, Zaher Mundher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 541 : 902 - 913
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, Water Science School
  • [4] Machine learning in sedimentation modelling
    Bhattacharya, B.
    Solomatine, D. P.
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORKS, 2006, 19 (02) : 208 - 214
  • [5] Bishop C., 2006, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, V2, P5
  • [6] Performance Analysis of Short and Mid-Term Wind Power Prediction using ARIMA and Hybrid Models
    Biswas, Ashoke Kumar
    Ahmed, Sina Ibne
    Bankefa, Temitope
    Ranganathan, Prakash
    Salehfar, Hossein
    [J]. 2021 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE AT ILLINOIS (PECI), 2021,
  • [7] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [8] Brezak D., 2012, PROC IEEE C COMPUTAT, P1
  • [9] Multilayer perceptron architecture optimization using parallel computing techniques
    Castro, Wilson
    Oblitas, Jimy
    Santa-Cruz, Roberto
    Avila-George, Himer
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12):
  • [10] Risk-Informed Prediction of Dredging Project Duration Using Stochastic Machine Learning
    Chou, Jui-Sheng
    Lin, Ji-Wei
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (06)