Economic Analysis and the EEXI Reduction Potential of Parallel Hybrid Dual-Fuel Engine-Fuel Cell Propulsion Systems for LNG Carriers

被引:6
作者
Ammar, Nader R. [1 ,2 ]
Almas, Majid [1 ]
Nahas, Qusai [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Maritime Studies, Dept Marine Engn, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Alexandria Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Alexandria, Egypt
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
EEXI; EPL; alternative fuels; LNG carrier; economic analysis; FISHING CARRIERS;
D O I
10.2478/pomr-2023-0039
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
One potential solution for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from ships and meeting the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI) requirements is to use a hybrid propulsion system that combines liquid hydrogen and liquefied natural gas fuels. To improve energy efficiency for diesel-electric dual-fuel ship propulsion systems, an engine power limitation system can also be used. This paper examines the potential use of these systems with regard to several factors, including compliance with EEXI standards set by the International Maritime Organization, fuel ratio optimisation, installation requirements, and economic feasibility. As a case study, an LNG carrier is analysed, with dual-fuel diesel-electric and two hybrid systems adjusted to meet IMO-EEXI requirements with engine power limitation percentages of 25%, 0% (hybrid option 1), and 15% (hybrid option 2), respectively. From an economic standpoint, the liquid hydrogen-based system has competitive costs compared to the dual-fuel diesel-electric system, with costs of 2.1 and 2.5 dollars per kilogram for hybrid system options 1 and 2, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 70
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
ABS, Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI)
[2]   Molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC)-based hybrid propulsion systems for a liquefied hydrogen tanker [J].
Ahn, Junkeon ;
Park, Sung Ho ;
Lee, Sanghyuk ;
Noh, Yeelyong ;
Chang, Daejun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (15) :7525-7537
[3]   Strategy for selecting an optimal propulsion system of a liquefied hydrogen tanker [J].
Ahn, Junkeon ;
You, Hwalong ;
Ryu, Jiheon ;
Chang, Daejun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (08) :5366-5380
[4]   Hybrid/dual fuel propulsion systems towards decarbonization: Case study container ship [J].
Ammar, Nader R. ;
Seddiek, Ibrahim S. .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 281
[5]   Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel [J].
Ammar, Nader R. ;
Seddiek, Ibrahim S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (28) :37851-37866
[6]   An environmental and economic analysis of emission reduction strategies for container ships with emphasis on the improved energy efficiency indexes [J].
Ammar, Nader R. ;
Seddiek, Ibrahim S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (18) :23342-23355
[7]   ENVIRONMENTAL AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON OF DUAL FUEL PROPULSION OPTIONS FOR EMISSIONS REDUCTION ONBOARD LNG CARRIERS [J].
Ammar, Nader R. .
BRODOGRADNJA, 2019, 70 (03) :61-77
[8]  
Baldi F., 2022, Sustainable Energy Systems on Ships, P513, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-824471-5.00028-1
[9]  
Ballard, Fuel cell power module for marine applications
[10]   A scenario-based assessment of the energy efficiency existing ship index (EEXI) and carbon intensity indicator (CII) regulations [J].
Bayraktar, Murat ;
Yuksel, Onur .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 278