Imaginaries of better administration: Renegotiating the relationship between citizens and digital public power

被引:5
作者
Esko, Terhi [1 ,4 ]
Koulu, Riikka [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Inst Criminol & Legal Policy, Fac Social Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Fac Social Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Fac Law, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Inst Criminol & Legal Policy, Fac Social Sci, Snellmaninkatu 10, Helsinki 00014, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Automated decision-making; socio-legal studies; relationship between citizens and public authorities; sociotechnical imaginaries; law reform; public administration; QUALITATIVE CONTENT-ANALYSIS; GOVERNMENT; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1177/20539517231164113
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article investigates future visions of digital public administration as they appear within a particular regulatory process that aims to enable automated decision-making (ADM) in public administration in Finland. By drawing on science and technology studies, public administration studies, and socio-legal studies we analyze law in the making and identify four imaginaries of public digital administration: understandable administration, self-monitoring administration, adaptive administration, and responsible administration. We argue that digital administration is seen from the perspective of public authorities serving their current needs of legitimizing existing automation practices. While technology is pictured as unproblematic, the citizen perspective is missing. We conclude that the absence of an in-depth understanding of the diverse needs of citizens raises the question whether the relationship between public power and citizens is becoming a one-way street despite of the public administration ideals that express values of citizen engagement.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research
    Bannister, Frank
    Connolly, Regina
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2014, 31 (01) : 119 - 128
  • [2] In search of the citizen in the datafication of public administration
    Broomfield, Heather
    Reutter, Lisa
    [J]. BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [3] Brownsword Roger., 2019, LAW TECHNOLOGY SOC R
  • [4] Chan J, 2021, ROUTL FRONT CRIMINOL, P41
  • [5] Cloatre E, 2020, RES HDB SOCIOLOGY LA, P81
  • [6] Cohen J, 2019, COM2021206
  • [7] Council of Europe, 2007, REC CN REC
  • [8] DESI, 2022, DIG EC SOC IND 2022
  • [9] The qualitative content analysis process
    Elo, Satu
    Kyngaes, Helvi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) : 107 - 115
  • [10] Floridi L., 2018, Philos. Technol., V31, P1, DOI [10.1007/s13347-018-0303-9, DOI 10.1007/S13347-018-0303-9]