Trends in the likelihood of receiving percutaneous coronary intervention in a low-volume hospital and disparities by sociodemographic communities

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Christina [1 ]
Lindquist, Karla [2 ]
Krumholz, Harlan [3 ]
Hsia, Renee Y. Y. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Yale Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Emergency Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Philip R Lee Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
APPROPRIATE USE CRITERIA; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; OUTCOMES; REVASCULARIZATION; MORTALITY; CALIFORNIA; DISEASE; RATES; RISK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0279905
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
IntroductionOver the past two decades, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capacity has increased while coronary artery disease has decreased, potentially lowering per-hospital PCI volumes, which is associated with less favorable patient outcomes. Trends in the likelihood of receiving PCI in a low-volume center have not been well-documented, and it is unknown whether certain socioeconomic factors are associated with a greater risk of PCI in a low-volume facility. Our study aims to determine the likelihood of being treated in a low-volume PCI center over time and if this likelihood differs by sociodemographic factors. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 374,066 hospitalized patients in California receiving PCI from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. Our primary outcome was the likelihood of PCI discharges at a low-volume hospital (<150 PCI/year), and secondary outcomes included whether this likelihood varied across different sociodemographic groups and across low-volume hospitals stratified by high or low ZIP code median income. ResultsThe proportion of PCI discharges from low-volume hospitals increased from 5.4% to 11.0% over the study period. Patients of all sociodemographic groups considered were more likely to visit low-volume hospitals over time (P<0.001). Latinx patients were more likely to receive PCI at a low-volume hospital compared with non-Latinx White in 2010 with a 166% higher gap in 2018 (unadjusted proportions). The gaps in relative risk (RR) between Black, Latinx and Asian patients versus non-Latinx white increased over time, whereas the gap between private versus public/no insurance, and high versus low income decreased (interaction P<0.001). In low-income ZIP codes, patients with Medicaid were less likely to visit low-volume hospitals than patients with private insurance in 2010; however, this gap reversed and increased by 500% in 2018. Patients with low income were more likely to receive PCI at low-volume hospitals relative to patients with high income in all study years. ConclusionsThe likelihood of receiving PCI at low-volume hospitals has increased across all race/ethnicity, insurance, and income groups over time; however, this increase has not occurred evenly across all sociodemographic groups.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Case Against Low-Volume Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Centers
    O'Neill, William W.
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (07) : 546 - 548
  • [2] PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST: SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC AND IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY DISPARITIES
    Lopes, Jan
    Lucas, Claire Huang
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 1156 - 1156
  • [3] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in a Low-Volume Center Survival, Stent Thrombosis, and Repeat Revascularization
    Kenney, Kimberly M.
    Marzo, Mitchell C.
    Ondrasik, Nicholas R.
    Wisenbaugh, Thomas
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2009, 2 (06): : 671 - U234
  • [4] Comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty outcome and hospital costs for low-volume and high-volume operators
    Shook, TL
    Sun, GW
    Burstein, S
    Eisenhauer, AC
    Matthews, RV
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 77 (05): : 331 - 336
  • [5] Ten Years of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Low-Volume Military Treatment Facility: A Quality Improvement Project
    Fentanes, Emilio
    Wisenbaugh, Thomas W.
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2013, 178 (09) : 1029 - 1035
  • [6] Transfer Travel Times for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention From Low-Volume and Non-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Capable Hospitals to High-Volume Centers in Florida
    Pathak, Elizabeth Barnett
    Forsyth, Colin J.
    Anic, Gabriella
    Tanner, Jean Paul
    Comins, Meg M.
    Strom, Joel A.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 58 (03) : 257 - 266
  • [7] Trends and disparities in referral to cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention
    Aragam, Krishna G.
    Moscucci, Mauro
    Smith, Dean E.
    Riba, Arthur L.
    Zainea, Mark
    Chambers, James L.
    Share, David
    Gurm, Hitinder S.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 161 (03) : 544 - +
  • [8] RECENT TRENDS IN PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION VOLUME IN THE UNITED STATES
    Stuntz, M.
    Palak, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A641 - A641
  • [9] Medicare Reduces Disparities in Hospital Readmission Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Sherrill, Clay
    Chew, Christopher
    Cowherd, Michael
    Yang, Hannan
    Rossi, Joseph
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [10] PERCUTANEOUS TRANS-LUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY BY HIGH-VOLUME AND LOW-VOLUME OPERATORS
    FINCI, L
    MEIER, B
    STEFFENINO, G
    URBAN, P
    NOBLE, J
    GABATHULER, J
    RUTISHAUSER, W
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 1987, 10 (05) : 355 - 357