Adoption of shared decision-making and clinical decision support for reducing cardiovascular disease risk in community health centers

被引:0
作者
Hauschildt, Jennifer [1 ]
Lyon-Scott, Kristin [1 ]
Sheppler, Christina R. [2 ]
Larson, Annie E. [1 ]
McMullen, Carmit [2 ]
Boston, David [1 ]
O'Connor, Patrick J. [3 ]
Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M. [3 ]
Gold, Rachel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] OCHIN Inc, Res Dept, Portland, OR 97228 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Hlth Res, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227 USA
[3] HealthPartners Inst, HealthPartners Ctr Chron Care Innovat, Bloomington, MN 55425 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
medical informatics; decision support systems-clinical; decision making-shared; cardiovascular diseases; community health centers; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; BLOOD-PRESSURE; PRIMARY-CARE; TASK-FORCE; SYSTEMS; BARRIERS; IMPLEMENTATION; DISPARITIES; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad012
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Electronic health record (EHR)-based shared decision-making (SDM) and clinical decision support (CDS) systems can improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) care quality and risk factor management. Use of the CV Wizard system showed a beneficial effect on high-risk community health center (CHC) patients' CVD risk within an effectiveness trial, but system adoption was low overall. We assessed which multi-level characteristics were associated with system use.Materials and Methods: Analyses included 80 195 encounters with 17 931 patients with high CVD risk and/or uncontrolled risk factors at 42 clinics in September 2018-March 2020. Data came from the CV Wizard repository and EHR data, and a survey of 44 clinic providers. Adjusted, mixed-effects multivariate Poisson regression analyses assessed factors associated with system use. We included clinic-and provider-level clustering as random effects to account for nested data.Results: Likelihood of system use was significantly higher in encounters with patients with higher CVD risk and at longer encounters, and lower when providers were > 10 minutes behind schedule, among other factors. Survey participants reported generally high satisfaction with the system but were less likely to use it when there were time constraints or when rooming staff did not print the system output for the provider.Discussion: CHC providers prioritize using this system for patients with the greatest CVD risk, when time permits, and when rooming staff make the information readily available. CHCs' financial constraints create substantial challenges to addressing barriers to improved system use, with health equity implications.Conclusion: Research is needed on improving SDM and CDS adoption in CHCs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Health Literacy and Patient Participation in Shared Decision-Making in Orthopedic Surgery [J].
Mertz, Kevin ;
Eppler, Sara ;
Shah, Romil Fenil ;
Yao, Jeffrey ;
Steffner, Robert ;
Safran, Marc ;
Hu, Serena ;
Chou, Loretta ;
Amanatullah, Derek F. ;
Kamal, Robin N. .
ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 45 (04) :227-232
[42]   Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: a scoping review at the crossroads [J].
Davis, Selena ;
Roudsari, Abdul ;
Raworth, Rebecca ;
Courtney, Karen L. ;
MacKay, Lee .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (04) :857-866
[43]   Incorporation of Shared Decision-Making in International Cardiovascular Guidelines, 2012-2022 [J].
Macdonald, Blair J. ;
Turgeon, Ricky D. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (09)
[44]   Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation: Development and Evaluation of a Mobile Health Application to Support Shared Decision-Making [J].
Stephan, Laura Siga ;
Almeida, Eduardo Dytz ;
Guimaraes, Raphael Boesche ;
Ley, Antonio Gaudie ;
Mathias, Rodrigo Goncalves ;
Assis, Maria Valeria ;
Luz Leiria, Tiago Luiz .
ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2018, 110 (01) :7-14
[45]   Patient autonomy and shared decision-making in the context of clinical trial participation [J].
Dennstaedt, Fabio ;
Putora, Paul Martin ;
Iseli, Thomas ;
Treffers, Theresa ;
Panje, Cedric ;
Fischer, Galina Farina .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2024, 54 (11)
[46]   Decision support needs for shared clinical decision-making regarding HPV vaccination among adults 27-45 years of age [J].
Wheldon, Christopher W. ;
Garg, Ashvita ;
Galvin, Annalynn M. ;
Moore, Jonathan D. ;
Thompson, Erika L. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (12) :3079-3085
[47]   Clinical Decision Support with or without Shared Decision Making to Improve Preventive Cancer Care: A Cluster-Randomized Trial [J].
Elliott, Thomas E. ;
Asche, Stephen E. ;
O'Connor, Patrick J. ;
Dehmer, Steven P. ;
Ekstrom, Heidi L. ;
Truitt, Anjali R. ;
Chrenka, Ella A. ;
Harry, Melissa L. ;
Saman, Daniel M. ;
Allen, Clayton, I ;
Bianco, Joseph A. ;
Freitag, Laura A. ;
Sperl-Hillen, Joann M. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2022, 42 (06) :808-821
[48]   Health risk assessment and decision-making for patient monitoring and decision-support using Wireless Body Sensor Networks [J].
Habib, Carol ;
Makhoul, Abdallah ;
Darazi, Rony ;
Couturier, Raphael .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2019, 47 :10-22
[49]   Inflammatory bowel disease: patients' and professionals' perceptions of shared decision-making [J].
Villar Bustos, Maria Carmen ;
Andina-Diaz, Elena .
ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2021, 34
[50]   A qualitative study on shared decision-making of patients with chronic kidney disease [J].
Ho, Ya-Fang ;
Chen, Yu-Chi ;
Li, I-Chuan .
NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (06) :3430-3440