A Market Value Analysis of Buyer-Supplier Relationship Building Awards

被引:1
|
作者
Verma, Nishant Kumar [1 ]
Jha, Ashish Kumar [2 ]
Bose, Indranil [3 ]
Ngai, Eric W. T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Bangalore, Bengaluru 560076, India
[2] Trinity Coll Dublin, Trinity Business Sch, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Indian Inst Management Ahmedabad, Ahmadabad 380015, India
[4] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Buyer-supplier relationship (BSR); corporate award; event study; firm value; supplier award; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; IMPACT; SATIATION; EVENT; PERFORMANCE; MOTIVATION; FIRM; PAY;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2022.3230079
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article is to study the signaling potential of "supplier awards " in creating shareholder value for the award-giving and the award-receiving firm. We use event study methodology with supplier awards as events that signal mutually beneficial buyer-supplier relationship (BSR) efforts to estimate the firm value generated from these efforts. Supplier awards, apart from being a supplier development (SD) activity in themselves, are also a signal of a mutually beneficial relationship between a buyer and a supplier. This article performs a deep study by investigating the impact of traits, such as award exclusivity and award satiation, on the efficacy of supplier awards as a signaling mechanism. We find that shareholders of firms that give awards (buyers) and those of firms that receive awards (suppliers) react positively to such events, thereby establishing the signaling potential of supplier awards that signal the mutually beneficial BSR and SD efforts. We find that a more exclusive award has a higher positive impact on the buyer's shareholders. We also find that there is a higher impact on the supplier's market value when that supplier receives awards less frequently. This article pioneers a study of interorganizational awards that considers traits, such as exclusivity and award satiation, that are not frequently studied in extant research.
引用
收藏
页码:4848 / 4861
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Buyer-supplier relationship decline: A norms-based perspective
    Marcos, Javier
    Prior, Daniel D.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 76 : 14 - 23
  • [22] Social capital, joint knowledge creation and relationship performance in buyer-supplier relationships
    Appiah, Listowel Owusu
    Obey, Vanessa Queennie
    SUPPLY CHAIN FORUM, 2023, 24 (02): : 217 - 232
  • [23] Using Buyer-Supplier Performance Frontiers to Manage Relationship Performance
    Ross, Anthony D.
    Buffa, Frank P.
    Droge, Cornelia
    Carrington, Donald
    DECISION SCIENCES, 2009, 40 (01) : 37 - 64
  • [24] The antecedents of dyadic quality performance and its effect on buyer-supplier relationship improvement
    Yang, Jie
    Wong, Christina W. Y.
    Lai, Kee-hung
    Ntoko, Alfred Ngome
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2009, 120 (01) : 243 - 251
  • [25] Retailers' new product acceptance decisions: incorporating the buyer-supplier relationship perspective
    Lin, Jiun-Sheng Chris
    Chang, Yun-Chi
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2012, 27 (1-2) : 89 - 99
  • [26] The Influence of the Type of Relationship on the Generation of Innovations in Buyer-Supplier Collaborations
    Clauss, Thomas
    CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 21 (04) : 388 - 411
  • [27] Monitoring type B buyer-supplier relationships
    Faraz, Alireza
    Sanders, Nada
    Zacharia, Zach
    Gerschberger, Markus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (18) : 6225 - 6239
  • [28] Benevolent dictatorship and buyer-supplier exchange
    Wang, Qiong
    Jap, Sandy
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 78 : 204 - 216
  • [29] The nature of commitment in buyer-supplier relationships
    Abe, Masato
    Cannon, Joseph P.
    Smith, Tasman D.
    JOURNAL OF INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2021, 27 (3-4): : 60 - 81
  • [30] Buyer-supplier embeddedness and patterns of innovation
    Kim, Yusoon
    Choi, Thomas Y.
    Skilton, Paul F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 (03) : 318 - 345