Interventional Radiology Peer Learning Platform and Adverse Event Reporting (IR-PEER): Initial Experience Implementing a Team-based Novel Peer Learning System in Interventional Radiology

被引:0
作者
Panagides, John C. [1 ]
Hancel, Kayesha [2 ]
Kalva, Sanjeeva [2 ]
Schenker, Matthew [3 ]
Saini, Sanjay [3 ]
Glazer, Daniel I. [3 ]
Khorasani, Ramin [3 ]
Daye, Dania [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Intervent Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Intervent Radiol, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Peer learning; peer review; complication reporting; learning opportunities; IMPROVEMENT; FACULTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2023.07.022
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Although the transition from peer review to peer learning has had favorable outcomes in diagnostic radiology, experience with implementing a team-based peer review system in interventional radiology (IR) remains limited. Peer learning systems benefit diverse IR teams composed of multiple clinical roles and could contribute value in archiving events that have potential educational value. With multiple stakeholder input from clinical roles within the IR division at our institution (ie, radiologic technologists, nurses, advanced practice providers, residents, fellows, and attending physicians), we launched a HIPAA-compliant secure IR complication and learning opportunity reporting platform in April 2022. Case submissions were monitored over the subsequent 24 weeks, with monthly dashboard reports provided to departmental leadership. Preintervention and postintervention surveys were used to assess the impact of the peer learning platform and adverse event reporting in IR (IR-PEER) on perceptions of complication reporting in the IR division across clinical roles. Ninety-two peer learning submissions were collected for a weekly average +/- standard error of 3.8 +/- 0.6 submissions per week, and an additional 26 submissions were collected as part of the division's ongoing monthly complication review conference, for a total of 98 unique total case references. A total of 64.1% of submissions (59 of 92) involved a complication and/or adverse event, and 35.9% of submissions (33 of 92) identified a learning opportunity (no complication or adverse event). Nurses reported that IR-PEER made the complication-reporting process easier (P = .01), and all clinical roles reported that IR-PEER improved the overall process of complication reporting. Peer learning frameworks such as IR-PEER provide a more equitable communication platform for multidisciplinary teams to capture and archive learning opportunities that support quality and safety improvement efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 102
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] RADPEER Peer Review: Relevance, Use, Concerns, Challenges, and Direction Forward
    Abujudeh, Hani
    Pyatt, Robert S., Jr.
    Bruno, Michael A.
    Chetlen, Alison L.
    Buck, David
    Hobbs, Susan K.
    Roth, Christopher
    Truwit, Charles
    Agarwal, Rajan
    Kennedy, Scott T. O.
    Glenn, Lucille
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (09) : 899 - 904
  • [2] Consensus-Oriented Group Peer Review: A New Process to Review Radiologist Work Output
    Alkasab, Tarik K.
    Harvey, H. Benjamin
    Gowda, Vrushab
    Thrall, James H.
    Rosenthal, Daniel I.
    Gazelle, G. Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (02) : 131 - 138
  • [3] Clinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform
    Bader, Husam
    Abdulelah, Mohammad
    Maghnam, Rama
    Chin, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INTERNAL MEDICINE PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 11 (06): : 817 - 820
  • [4] The Complementary Nature of Peer Review and Quality Assurance Data Collection
    Brook, Olga R.
    Romero, Janneth
    Brook, Alexander
    Kruskal, Jonathan B.
    Yam, Chun S.
    Levine, Deborah
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (01) : 221 - 229
  • [5] Assessment of a Large-Scale Peer Learning Program?s Value by Manual Review of Case Submissions
    Burk, Kristine S.
    Zhao, Anna H.
    Glazer, Daniel I.
    Giess, Catherine
    Boland, Giles W.
    Khorasani, Ramin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (10) : 1138 - 1150
  • [6] Just Culture: Practical Implementation for Radiologist Peer Review
    Burns, Judah
    Miller, Todd
    Weiss, Jeffrey M.
    Erdfarb, Amichai
    Silber, David
    Goldberg-Stein, Shlomit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 16 (03) : 384 - 388
  • [7] How to Effectively Implement a Peer Review Process for Interventional Radiology Procedures
    Caruso, Michael
    DiRoberto, Cole
    Howe, John, Jr.
    Baccei, Steven J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (09) : 1106 - 1108
  • [8] Collaborative Learning in Radiology: From Peer Review to Peer Learning and Peer Coaching
    Chetlen, Alison L.
    Petscavage-Thomas, Jonelle
    Cherian, Rekha A.
    Ulano, Adam
    Nandwana, Sadhna B.
    Curci, Nicole E.
    Swanson, Robert T.
    Artrip, Rick
    Bathala, Tharakeswara K.
    Gettle, Lori Mankowski
    Frigini, L. Alexandre
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (09) : 1261 - 1267
  • [9] Peer Learning Through Multi-Institutional Case Conferences: Abdominal and Cardiothoracic Radiology Experience
    Chow, Ryan A.
    Tan, Nelly
    Henry, Travis S.
    Kanne, Jeffrey P.
    Sekhar, Aarti
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 255 - 260
  • [10] Interventional Radiology Peer, a Newly Developed Peer-Review Scoring System Designed for Interventional Radiology Practice
    d'Othee, Bertrand Janne
    Haskal, Ziv J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (10) : 1481 - 1486