Rasch validation of the German translation of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility short forms in people with lower limb amputation

被引:3
作者
Bekrater-Bodmann, Robin [1 ]
Kehl, Isabelle [1 ]
Hafner, Brian J. [2 ]
Ranker, Alexander [3 ]
Giordano, Andrea [4 ]
Franchignoni, Franco [5 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Cent Inst Mental Hlth, Dept Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapy, Mannheim, Germany
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Rehabil Med, Hannover, Germany
[4] Sci Inst Veruno, Bioengn Unit, Ist Clin Sci Maugeri IRCCS, Veruno, Italy
[5] Sci Inst Tradate, Phys & Rehabil Med Unit, Ist Clin Sci Maugeri IRCCS, Tradate, Italy
关键词
lower limb amputation; prosthesis; mobility; rehabilitation; outcome; validation; Rasch analysis; CLASSICAL TEST THEORY; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; OUTCOME MEASURES;
D O I
10.1097/PXR.0000000000000201
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Prostheses are a primary rehabilitative intervention for people after lower limb amputation. To appropriately measure the effectiveness of prosthetic interventions, valid and reliable measures of prosthetic mobility are required. The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) is a promising instrument for measuring prosthesis users' mobility. However, German translations of the PLUS-M short forms have not yet been validated. Objectives: Rasch validation of the German translation of the PLUS-M short forms in people with lower limb amputation. Study design: This study is based on a cross-sectional survey of prosthesis-using lower limb amputees from a nation-wide cohort. Methods: PLUS-M data (the 7-item and the 12-item shortforms; PLUS-M-7 and PLUS-M-12, respectively) from 194 lower limb prosthesis users were subjected to Rasch analysis, an advanced statistical method for assessing if the measurement properties of a questionnaire comply with a wide spectrum of psychometric requirements. Results: Analysis showed appropriate rating scale functioning, good internal construct validity (item fit), unidimensionality, and good targeting of the PLUS-M-7 and PLUS-M-12 short forms. Moreover, the greater conditional measurement precision of PLUS-M-12 (regarding higher test information and lower standard error of mobility estimates) was quantified. Conclusions: Rasch analysis of the German translation of both PLUS-M short forms showed good psychometric qualities. In addition, our study showed that test scores from the PLUS-M-12 are more accurate. Therefore, the PLUS-M-12 is recommended for individual-level clinical applications (e.g., classification or change assessment).
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 557
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users
    Burger, Helena
    Giordano, Andrea
    Mlakar, Maja
    Albensi, Caterina
    Brezovar, Darinka
    Franchignoni, Franco
    ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2019, 62 (03) : 168 - 173
  • [42] Determining 1-Yr Prosthetic Use for Mobility Prognoses for Community-Dwelling Adults with Lower-Limb Amputation: Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule
    Wong, Christopher Kevin
    Young, Rebecca S.
    Ow-Wing, Carlyn
    Karimi, Parisa
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2016, 95 (05) : 339 - 347
  • [43] Validation of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale With 5-Option Response Format in Slovene Lower-Limb Prosthetic Users
    Franchignoni, Franco
    Bavec, Andrej
    Zupanc, Urska
    Giordano, Andrea
    Albensi, Caterina
    Burger, Helena
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 102 (04): : 619 - 625
  • [44] The Component Timed-Up-and-Go test: the utility and psychometric properties of using a mobile application to determine prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputations
    Clemens, Sheila M.
    Gailey, Robert S.
    Bennett, Christopher L.
    Pasquina, Paul F.
    Kirk-Sanchez, Neva J.
    Gaunaurd, Ignacio A.
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 32 (03) : 388 - 397