Life cycle assessment for producing monocrystalline photovoltaic panels: a case study of Brazil

被引:0
作者
Pupin, Priscila Carvalho [1 ]
Perazzini, Maisa Tonon Bitti [2 ]
Reno, Maria Luiza Grillo [1 ]
Perazzini, Hugo [2 ]
Haddad, Jamil [1 ]
Yamachita, Roberto Akira [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Itajuba, Inst Mech Engn, Itajuba, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Itajuba, Inst Nat Resources, Itajuba, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Itajuba, Inst Elect Syst & Energy, Itajuba, MG, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Itajuba, Inst Elect Syst & Energy, Av BPS 1303,Bairro Pinheirinho, Itajuba, MG, Brazil
关键词
Clean energy; environmental impact; life cycle assessment; photovoltaic panels; renewable energy; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; PV SYSTEMS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1080/15567036.2023.2278724
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Energy generation from photovoltaic panels provides for clean, renewable, low environmental impact energy. However, such characteristics are only related to products already in operation, as they do not apply to their production process. In this study, Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) was conducted to quantify 11 environmental impacts caused by the production of monocrystalline silicon photovoltaic panels in Brazil, considering raw material extraction, material processing, construction, and part production. The LCA showed that the photovoltaic panel production process has several environmental impacts that can be minimized by implementing changes to the production chain, especially to reduce the generation of greenhouse gases which contribute to global warming. It was observed that the solar cell production stage contributes to the environmental impacts the most, especially to those referring to abiotic depletion (84%) and to all stratospheric ozone layer depletion (62%). The potential impacts estimated were 9.43 x 10-2 kg Sbeq and 5.34 x 10-4 kg CFC-11eq, respectively. With relation to global warming, Greenhouse Gases (GHG) were emitted with a corresponding value of 3.23 x 103 kg CO2 eq, it was caused by CO2, CH4, HFC-134a, nitrous oxide, HFC-23, CFC-13 gases. To reduce impact per unit of production, it is suggested that the monocrystalline silicon panel production be substituted for polycrystalline, and more incentives be provided to increase large-scale panel production, making it cheaper.
引用
收藏
页码:12924 / 12937
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] ABNT NBR 14040 (Associacao Brasileira de Normas Tecnicas), 2009, Gestao ambiental-Avaliacao do ciclo de vida-Principios e estrutura
  • [2] ABSOLAR (Associacao Brasileira de Energia Solar Fotovoltaica), 2022, Reciclagem de paineis solares e cada vez necessaria
  • [3] ABSOLAR (Associacao Brasileira de Energia Solar Fotovoltaica), 2018, Estudo revela potencial solar em seis microrregioes de Minas Gerais
  • [4] ABSOLAR (Associacao Brasileira de Energia Solar Fotovoltaica), 2022, Solar Photovoltaic Energy in Brazil: Absolar's Infographic
  • [5] ABSOLAR (Associacao Brasileira de Energia Solar Fotovoltaica), 2019, Fiesp debate vantagens da energia solar fotovoltaica para o pais
  • [6] ABSOLAR (Associacao Brasileira de Energia Solar Fotovoltaica), 2020, Beneficios da energia solar na preservacao do meio ambiente e sustentabilidade
  • [7] ABSOLAR (Associacao Brasileira de Energia Solar Fotovoltaica), 2022, Energia Solar Fotovoltaica: Brasil e o 4 Pais que mais cresceu em 2021
  • [8] The Design Value for Recycling End-of-Life Photovoltaic Panels
    Cali, Michele
    Hajji, Bekkay
    Nitto, Gioele
    Acri, Alberto
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (18):
  • [9] Environmental impact assessment of monocrystalline silicon solar photovoltaic cell production: a case study in China
    Chen, Wei
    Hong, Jinglan
    Yuan, Xueliang
    Liu, Jiurong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 1025 - 1032
  • [10] Collins Kayla, 2015, 2015 IEEE 42nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC). Proceedings, P1, DOI 10.1109/PVSC.2015.7356393