Corneal Stress Distribution Evolves from Thickness-Driven in Normal Corneas to Curvature-Driven with Progression in Keratoconus

被引:7
|
作者
Roberts, Cynthia J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Knoll, Kayla M. [1 ,3 ]
Mahmoud, Ashraf M. [1 ,2 ]
Hendershot, Andrew J. [1 ]
Yuhas, Phillip T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Coll Optometry, Columbus, OH USA
[4] 915 Olentangy River Rd,Suite 5000, Columbus, OH 43212 USA
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE | 2024年 / 4卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Tomography; Corneal tomography; Curvature; Keratoconus; Stress; Thickness; CONE LOCATION; ECTASIA; INDEX; VIVO;
D O I
10.1016/j.xops.2023.100373
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To introduce the novel parameter of Corneal Contribution to Stress (CCS) and compare stress distribution patterns between keratoconus (KCN) and normal corneas. Design: Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. Participants: The study included 66 eyes of 40 subjects diagnosed with KCN and 155 left eyes from 155 normal control (NRL) subjects. Methods: Tomography was obtained to calculate the newly proposed CCS, defined according to the hoop stress formula without intraocular pressure, R/2t, where R is the radius of curvature and t is the thickness. CCS maps were calculated from pachymetry and tangential curvature maps. Custom software identified the 2-mm -diameter zones of greatest curvature (Cspot-max), thinnest pachymetry (Pach-min), greatest stress (CCSmax), and lowest stress (CCSmin). Stress difference (CCSdiff) was calculated as CCSmax e CCSmin. Distances be-tween Cspot-max vs. Pach-min, vs. CCSmax, and vs. CCSmin, as well as between Pach-min vs. CCSmax and vs. CCSmin, were calculated. t tests were performed between cohorts, and paired t tests were performed within cohorts. Univariate linear regression analyses were performed between parameters and distances. The significance threshold was P < 0.05. Main Outcome Measures: Corneal stress parameters, corneal features of maximum curvature, minimum thickness, and distances between corneal stress parameters and corneal features. Results: CCSmax was significantly closer to Pach-min (0.79 +/- 0.92) and Cspot-max (2.04 +/- 0.85) than CCSmin (3.17 +/- 0.38, 2.73 +/- 1.53, respectively) in NRL, P < 0.0001, whereas CCSmin was significantly closer to Cspot-max (1.35 +/- 1.43) than CCSmax (2.52 +/- 0.72) in KCN, P < 0.0001. Cspot-max (severity) was significantly related to CCSdiff in KCN (P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.5882) with a weak relationship in NRL (P < 0.0080, R2 = 0.0451). Cspot-max was significantly related to the distance from Pach-min to CCSmax (P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.3737) without significance in NRL (P = 0.8011). Conclusions: Corneal stress is driven by thickness in NRL, with greatest stress at thinnest pachymetry and greatest curvature. However, maximum stress moves away from thinnest pachymetry with progression in KCN, and minimum stress is associated with maximum curvature. Severity in KCN is significantly related to greater difference between maximum and minimum stress, consistent with the biomechanical cycle of decompensation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据