Factors influencing sustainability aspects in crowdsourced software development: A systematic literature review

被引:0
作者
Haider, Waqas [1 ]
Ilyas, Muhammad [1 ,3 ]
Khalid, Shah [1 ]
Ali, Sikandar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malakand, Dept Comp Sci & IT, Software Engn Res Grp SERG UOM, Chakdara, Pakistan
[2] Univ Haripur, Dept Informat Technol, Haripur, Pakistan
[3] Univ Malakand, Dept Comp Sci & IT, Software Engn Res Grp SERG UOM, Chakdara 18800, KPK, Pakistan
关键词
critical factors; software crowdsourcing; software sustainability; systematic literature review; CHALLENGES; GREEN;
D O I
10.1002/smr.2630
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Crowdsource software development has become more and more popular in recent years in the software industry. Crowdsourcing is an open-call technique for outsourcing tasks to a broad and undefined crowd. Crowdsourcing provides numerous advantages including reduced costs, fast project completion, talent identification, diversity of solutions, top-quality, and access to problem-solving creativity. Despite of the benefits gained from crowdsourcing, there are numerous issues like lack of experienced workers, lack of confidentiality, copyright issues, software sustainability, and so forth. There is also less focus on the long-term sustainability of software development because of new ideas emerging in crowdsourcing software development. Furthermore, in literature, lack of guidelines towards sustainable software crowdsourcing is highlighted as one of the limitations in the software standards. This study aims to identify the factors that influence sustainability aspects in crowdsourced software development. We have conducted a systematic literature review for identification of these factors. In this paper, we present findings of the systematic literature review in the form of a list of 11 factors extracted from a sample of 45 finally selected papers. Among these factors, six of the factors are ranked as critical factors. These critical factors are "Lack of coding standard in documentation," "Use of popular programming tools," "Crowd Lack of knowledge and awareness about sustainability," "Energy-efficient coding," "Lack of awareness about sustainable software engineering practices," and "Lack of coordination/communication between client and crowd." Crowdsourcing is an open-call technique for outsourcing tasks to a broad and undefined crowd. Crowdsourcing provides numerous advantages, but there is less focus on the long-term sustainability of software development because of new ideas emerging in crowdsourcing software development. This study aims to identify the factors that influence sustainability aspects in crowdsourced software development. We present findings of systematic literature review in the form of a list of 11 factors extracted from a sample of 45 finally selected papers.image
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 85 条
[41]  
Khan Abdullah, 2022, Proceedings of International Conference on Information Technology and Applications: ICITA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (350), P355, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-7618-5_31
[42]  
Khan AW., 2023, Cogn Technol Work, P1, DOI [10.1007/s10111-023-00731-9, DOI 10.1007/S10111]
[43]  
Khan R., 2015, Pak. Acad. Sci., V52, P345
[44]  
Khan R.A., 2017, Proc. Pak. Acad. Sci. Phys. Comput. Sci, V54, P41
[45]  
Khan RA., 2014, SCI INT, V26, P1425
[46]  
Khan RA., 2015, A survey based study on communication and coordination challenges in offshore software development outsourcing relationships from vendors' perspective
[47]   An Evaluation Framework for Communication and Coordination Processes in Offshore Software Development Outsourcing Relationship: Using Fuzzy Methods [J].
Khan, Rafiq Ahmad ;
Idris, Mohd Yazid ;
Khan, Siffat Ullah ;
Ilyas, Muhammad ;
Ali, Sikandar ;
Din, Aziz Ud ;
Murtaza, Ghulam ;
Khan, Abdul Wahid ;
Jan, Saeed Ullah .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :112879-112906
[48]  
Khan SU., 2023, Cogn Technol Work, P1, DOI [10.1007/s10111-023-00733-7, DOI 10.1007/S10111]
[49]  
Kitchenham B., 2007, Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering
[50]  
Kitchenham B, 2004, Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews, P33, DOI DOI 10.5144/0256-4947.2017.79