Exploring clinicians? decision-making processes about end-of-life care after burns: A qualitative interview study

Introduction: Little is known about treatment decision-making experiences and how/why particular attitudes exist amongst specialist burn clinicians when faced with patients with potentially non-survivable burn injuries. This exploratory qualitative study aimed to un-derstand clinicians' decision-making processes regarding end-of-life (EoL) care after a se-vere and potentially non-survivable burn injury. Methods: Eleven clinicians experienced in EoL decision-making were interviewed via tele-phone or video conferencing in June-August 2021. A thematic analysis was undertaken using a framework approach. Results: Decision-making about initiating EoL care was described as complex and multi -factorial. On occasions when people presented with 'unsurvivable' injuries, decision -making was clear. Most clinicians used a multidisciplinary team approach to initiate EoL; variations existed on which professions were included in the decision-making process. Many clinicians reported using protocols or guidelines that could be personalised to each patient. The use of pathways/protocols might explain why clinicians did not report routine involvement of palliative care clinicians in EoL discussions. Conclusion: The process of EoL decision-making for a patient with a potentially non -survi-vable burn injury was layered, complex, and tailored. Processes and approaches varied, although most used protocols to guide EoL decisions. Despite the reported complexity of EoL decision-making, palliative care teams were rarely involved or consulted. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.