Revisiting primary endocrine therapy versus surgery in older women with breast cancer: meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Chan, Kai Siang [1 ]
Chong, Michelle Tian Hui [1 ,2 ]
Chia, Clement Luck Khng [1 ]
Cheung, Kwok Leung [3 ]
机构
[1] Khoo Teck Puat Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Breast Surg Serv, 90 Yishun Cent, Singapore 768828, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Nottingham, England
关键词
PATIENT-LEVEL METAANALYSIS; PRIMARY TAMOXIFEN THERAPY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; ELDERLY-WOMEN; ADJUVANT TAMOXIFEN; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; AGE GAP; SURVIVAL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1093/bjs/znac435
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This updated meta-analysis demonstrated worse overall and recurrence-free survival with primary endocrine therapy (PET) compared with primary surgical therapy (PST) in older women. However, this may be confounded by increased age and co-morbidities in patients receiving PET. Health-related quality of life outcomes were mostly comparable between PET and PST. Background Old age is associated with increased co-morbidities, resulting in reduced life expectancy. Primary endocrine therapy is an alternative to primary surgical therapy for patients with breast cancer and increased co-morbidities. The aim was to review outcomes of primary endocrine therapy versus primary surgical therapy in older women with breast cancer. Methods PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically from January 2000 to May 2022. Single-arm studies were excluded. Primary outcomes were overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival. Secondary outcomes were local and regional failure of primary endocrine therapy, recurrence after primary surgical therapy, and health-related quality of life. Results There were 14 studies including 14 254 patients (primary endocrine therapy 2829, 19.8 per cent; primary surgical therapy 11 425, 80.2 per cent), with the addition of four major studies (9538 patients) compared with the latest review in 2014. Seven studies defined primary surgical therapy as surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy, and six studies included patients with oestrogen receptor-positive tumours only. Patients in the primary endocrine therapy group were older than the primary surgical therapy group (mean difference 2.43 (95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 4.13) years). Primary endocrine therapy led to worse overall survival than primary surgical therapy (HR 1.42, 95 per cent c.i. 1.06 to 1.91). Subgroup analysis of RCTs and prospective studies, however, showed comparable overall survival. Breast cancer-specific survival was also comparable (HR 1.28, 95 per cent c.i. 0.87 to 1.87). At 6 weeks, operated patients had significant arm symptoms and illness burden following major breast surgery compared with patients receiving primary endocrine therapy. Health-related quality of life, measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and EuroQol EQ-5D-5L (TM), was comparable in the two treatment groups. Conclusion Overall survival was worse among older women receiving primary endocrine therapy in an analysis including all studies, but comparable in RCTs and prospective studies. This may be due to confounding by age and co-morbidities in retrospective cohort studies of primary endocrine therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 431
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women
    Morgan, Jenna
    Wyld, Lynda
    Collins, Karen A.
    Reed, Malcolm W.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (05):
  • [2] Management and outcomes for older women with early breast cancer treated with primary endocrine therapy (PET)
    Hubbard, Thomas
    Wright, Georgia
    Morgan, Jenna
    Martin, Charlene
    Walters, Stephen
    Cheung, Kwok-Leung
    Audisio, Riccardo
    Reed, Malcolm
    Wyld, Lynda
    BREAST, 2024, 77
  • [3] Hormone Receptor Expression on Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhong, Yangyan
    Ding, Boni
    Qian, Liyuan
    Wu, Wei
    Wen, Yanguang
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2022, 88 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [4] Radiotherapy concurrent versus sequential with endocrine therapy in breast cancer: A meta-analysis
    Li, Yun-Fen
    Chang, Li
    Li, Wen-Hui
    Xiao, Min-Yang
    Wang, Yong
    He, Wen-Jie
    Xia, Yao-Xiong
    Wang, Li
    Chen, Yan
    BREAST, 2016, 27 : 93 - 98
  • [5] The role of primary endocrine therapy in older women with operable breast cancer
    Johnston, Simon J.
    Cheung, Kwok-Leung
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 (10) : 1555 - 1565
  • [6] Cognitive sequelae of endocrine therapy in women treated for breast cancer: a meta-analysis
    Underwood, E. A.
    Rochon, P. A.
    Moineddin, R.
    Lee, P. E.
    Wu, W.
    Pritchard, K. I.
    Tierney, M. C.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 168 (02) : 299 - 310
  • [7] Healthcare professionals' preferences for surgery or primary endocrine therapy to treat older women with operable breast cancer
    Morgan, J. L.
    Collins, K.
    Robinson, T. G.
    Cheung, K. -L.
    Audisio, R.
    Reed, M. W.
    Wyld, L.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (09): : 1234 - 1242
  • [8] Herbal Medicine for Hot Flushes Induced by Endocrine Therapy in Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Yuanqing
    Zhu, Xiaoshu
    Bensussan, Alan
    Li, Pingping
    Moylan, Eugene
    Delaney, Geoff
    McPherson, Luke
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 2016
  • [9] Primary endocrine therapy as a treatment for older women with operable breast cancer - A comparison of randomised controlled trial and cohort study findings
    Morgan, J. L.
    Reed, M. W.
    Wyld, L.
    EJSO, 2014, 40 (06): : 676 - 684
  • [10] Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Surgery Plus Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Versus Primary Endocrine Therapy Alone in UK Women Aged 70 and Over With Early Breast Cancer
    Holmes, Geoffrey R.
    Ward, Sue E.
    Brennan, Alan
    Bradburn, Michael
    Morgan, Jenna L.
    Reed, Malcolm W. R.
    Richards, Paul
    Rafia, Rachid
    Wyld, Lynda
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 (06) : 770 - 779