A perspective on quantifying resilience: Combining community and infrastructure capitals

被引:17
作者
Gerges, Firas [1 ,2 ]
Assaad, Rayan H. [1 ]
Nassif, Hani [3 ]
Bou-Zeid, Elie [4 ]
Boufadel, Michel C. [1 ]
机构
[1] New Jersey Inst Technol, Ctr Nat Resources, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[2] New Jersey Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[3] Rutgers Univ New Brunswick, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[4] Princeton Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
Resilience; Climate change; Social resilience; Infrastructure resilience; Natural disasters; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SEISMIC RESILIENCE; IMPACTS; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; VULNERABILITY; ADAPTATION; RESOURCES; DISASTERS; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160187
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The resilience of communities has emerged as a major goal in policy and practice. Cities, states, and counties within the United States and around the world are passing laws requiring the incorporation of climate-related hazard vulnerability assessments within their master plan updates for resilience planning and design. The resilience of communities under present and future scenarios is thus becoming a cornerstone of decision making and actions. Decisions that would enhance resilience, however, span multiple sectors and involve various stakeholders. Quantifying community resilience is a key step in order to describe the preparedness level of communities, and subsequently locating non-resilient areas to further enhance their capacity to endure disasters. Two main approaches are currently being pursued to evaluate resilience. The first approach is the "community resilience" developed mainly by social scientists and planners, and it captures social resilience using numerous pre-disaster attributes to describe the functioning of a community. This approach subsumes that pre-disaster attributes can predict the community resilience to a disaster. The second approach is adopted for infrastructure resilience, mostly used by engineers, and it focuses on robustness, redundancy, resourcefulness, and rapidity. This approach is appropriate for systems that are operated by highly skilled personnel and where the actions are of engineering type. In this paper, we provide an overview of the two approaches, and we leverage their limitations to propose a hybrid approach that combines community and infrastructure capitals into an Area Resilience metric, called ARez. ARez captures the role/impact of both infrastructure and community and combines five sectors: energy, public health, natural ecosystem, socio-economic, and transportation. We present a proof-of-concept for the ARez metric, showing its practicality and applicability as a direct measure for resilience, over various time scales.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] The Resilience Activation Framework: a Conceptual Model of How Access to Social Resources Promotes Adaptation and Rapid Recovery in Post-disaster Settings
    Abramson, David M.
    Grattan, Lynn M.
    Mayer, Brian
    Colten, Craig E.
    Arosemena, Farah A.
    Bedimo-Rung, Ariane
    Lichtveld, Maureen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES & RESEARCH, 2015, 42 (01) : 42 - 57
  • [2] Droughts, floods and freshwater ecosystems: evaluating climate change impacts and developing adaptation strategies
    Aldous, Allison
    Fitzsimons, James
    Richter, Brian
    Bach, Leslie
    [J]. MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2011, 62 (03) : 223 - 231
  • [3] Andersen ChristineF., 2007, NEW ORLEANS HURRICAN
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, Critical Infrastructure Resilience Final Report and Recommendations
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, 2017 Infrastructure Report Card
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2013, PRESIDENTIAL POLICY
  • [7] Validating Resilience and Vulnerability Indices in the Context of Natural Disasters
    Bakkensen, Laura A.
    Fox-Lent, Cate
    Read, Laura K.
    Linkov, Igor
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (05) : 982 - 1004
  • [8] Bartos MD, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P748, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2648, 10.1038/nclimate2648]
  • [9] Beck J. V., 1977, Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science
  • [10] Blaikie P., 2005, At Risk: Natural Hazards, Peoples Vulnerability and Disasters