A multicenter retrospective study on 4480 implanted PICC-ports: A GAVeCeLT project

被引:23
作者
Bertoglio, Sergio [1 ,2 ]
Annetta, Maria Giuseppina [3 ]
Brescia, Fabrizio [4 ]
Emoli, Alessandro [5 ]
Fabiani, Fabio [4 ]
Fino, Maria [6 ]
Merlicco, Domenico [6 ]
Musaro, Andrea [7 ]
Orlandi, Marina [8 ]
Parisella, Laura [4 ]
Pinelli, Fulvio [8 ]
Reina, Simona [2 ]
Selmi, Valentina [8 ]
Solari, Nicola [2 ]
Tricarico, Fausto [9 ]
Pittiruti, Mauro [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, Dept Surg Sci, Largo R Benzi 10, I-16132 Genoa, Liguria, Italy
[2] Osped Policlin San Martino, Gen Surg Unit 1, Genoa, Italy
[3] A Gemelli Univ Hosp Fdn, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Rome, Italy
[4] IRCCS, Anesthesiol & Intens Care Unit, Ctr Riferimento Oncol Aviano, Aviano, Italy
[5] A Gemelli Univ Hosp Fdn, Dept Oncol, Rome, Italy
[6] Univ Hosp, Vasc Access Ctr, Gen Surg Unit, Foggia, Italy
[7] A Gemelli Univ Hosp Fdn, Dept Oncol Gynecol, Rome, Italy
[8] Careggi Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Florence, Italy
[9] Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Foggia, Italy
[10] Catholic Univ, A Gemelli Univ Hosp Fdn, Dept Surg, Rome, Italy
关键词
Central venous catheter; totally implantable access devices; peripherally inserted central catheters; complications; adverse events; PICC-ports; ACCESS DEVICES; CATHETER; COMPLICATIONS; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1177/11297298211067683
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: PICC-ports may be defined as totally implantable central venous devices inserted in the upper limb using the current state-of-the-art techniques of PICC insertion (ultrasound-guided venipuncture of deep veins of the arm, micro-puncture kits, proper location of the tip preferably by intracavitary ECG), with placement of the reservoir at the middle third of the arm. A previous report on breast cancer patients demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these devices, with a very low failure rate. Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study-developed by GAVeCeLT (the Italian Group of Long-Term Venous Access Devices)-investigated the outcomes of PICC-ports in a large cohort of unselected patients. The study included 4480 adult patients who underwent PICC-port insertion in five Italian centers, during a period of 60 months. The primary outcome was device failure, defined as any serious adverse event (SAE) requiring removal. The secondary outcome was the incidence of temporary adverse events (TAE) not requiring removal. Results: The median follow-up was 15.5 months. Device failure occurred in 52 cases (1.2%), the main causes being local infection (n = 7; 0.16%) and CRBSI (n = 19; 0.42%). Symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis occurred in 93 cases (2.1%), but removal was required only in one case (0.02%). Early/immediate and late TAE occurred in 904 cases (20.2%) and in 176 cases (3.9%), respectively. Conclusions: PICC-ports are safe venous access devices that should be considered as an alternative option to traditional arm-ports and chest-ports when planning chemotherapy or other long-term intermittent intravenous treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1120
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Extending the interval of flushing procedures of totally implantable vascular access devices in cancer patients: It is time for a change [J].
Bertoglio, Sergio .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2021, 22 (05) :689-691
[2]   PICC-PORT totally implantable vascular access device in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy [J].
Bertoglio, Sergio ;
Cafiero, Ferdinando ;
Meszaros, Paolo ;
Varaldo, Emanuela ;
Blondeaux, Eva ;
Molinelli, Chiara ;
Minuto, Michele .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2020, 21 (04) :460-466
[3]   Totally implantable vascular access devices 30 years after the first procedure. What has changed and what is still unsolved? [J].
Biffi, Roberto ;
Toro, Adriana ;
Pozzi, Simonetta ;
Di Carlo, Isidoro .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2014, 22 (06) :1705-1714
[4]   Peripherally inserted central catheter-related deep vein thrombosis: contemporary patterns and predictors: reply [J].
Chopra, V. ;
Kuhn, L. ;
Ratz, D. ;
Lee, A. ;
Krein, S. .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2014, 12 (11) :1944-1947
[5]   Randomised phase II trial evaluating the safety of peripherally inserted catheters versus implanted port catheters during adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer [J].
Clatot, Florian ;
Fontanilles, Maxime ;
Lefebvre, Laureline ;
Lequesne, Justine ;
Veyret, Corinne ;
Alexandru, Cristina ;
Leheurteur, Marianne ;
Guillemet, Cecile ;
Gouerant, Sophie ;
Petrau, Camille ;
Thery, Jean-Christophe ;
Rigal, Olivier ;
Moldovan, Cristian ;
Tennevet, Isabelle ;
Rastelli, Olivier ;
Poullain, Amelie ;
Savary, Laetitia ;
Bubenheim, Michael ;
Georgescu, Dragos ;
Gouerant, Julien ;
Gilles-Baray, Marie ;
Di Fiore, Frederic .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 126 :116-124
[6]  
Dawson R.B., 2011, JAVA, V16, P156, DOI [DOI 10.2309/JAVA.16-3-5, 10.2309/java.16-3-5]
[7]   Central venous catheter-related thrombosis [J].
Geerts, William .
HEMATOLOGY-AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY EDUCATION PROGRAM, 2014, :306-311
[8]   Anticoagulation for people with cancer and central venous catheters [J].
Kahale, Lara A. ;
Tsolakian, Ibrahim G. ;
Hakoum, Maram B. ;
Matar, Charbel F. ;
Barba, Maddalena ;
Yosuico, Victor E. D. ;
Terrenato, Irene ;
Sperati, Francesca ;
Schunemann, Holger ;
Akl, Elie A. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (06)
[9]   Patients' attitudes to totally implantable venous access port systems for gynecological or breast malignancies [J].
Kreis, H. ;
Loehberg, C. R. ;
Lux, M. P. ;
Ackermann, S. ;
Lang, W. ;
Beckmann, M. W. ;
Fasching, P. A. .
EJSO, 2007, 33 (01) :39-43
[10]   Peripherally inserted central catheter thrombosis incidence and risk factors in cancer patients: a double-center prospective investigation [J].
Liu, Yuxiu ;
Gao, Yufang ;
Wei, Lili ;
Chen, Weifen ;
Ma, Xiaoyan ;
Song, Lei .
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 2015, 11 :153-160