Management and risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia in the breast: A population-based retrospective cohort study

被引:0
作者
Wadsten, Charlotta [1 ,3 ]
Rask, Gunilla [2 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Oncol, Umea, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Dept Med Biosci Pathol, Umea, Sweden
[3] Sundsvall Hosp, Dept Surg, S-85643 Sundsvall, Sweden
关键词
Atypical ductal hyperplasia; breast carcinoma; upgrade rate; VACUUM-ASSISTED BIOPSY; CORE NEEDLE-BIOPSY; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; CANCER RISK; MALIGNANCY; DIAGNOSIS; LESIONS; WOMEN; SURGERY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1177/14574969241234115
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: International guidelines recommend open surgery for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in the breast due to risk of underestimating malignant disease. Considering the ongoing randomized trials of active surveillance of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), it seems reasonable to define a low-risk group of women with ADH where a conservative approach is appropriate. The aim here was to evaluate the management and risk for upgrade of lesions diagnosed as ADH in percutaneous breast biopsies in two Swedish hospitals.Methods: All women with a screen-detected or symptomatic breast lesion breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 2-4 and a percutaneous biopsy showing ADH between 2013 and 2022 at Sundsvall Hospital and Umea University Hospital were included. Information regarding imaging, histopathology, clinical features, and management was retrieved from medical records. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for upgrade to malignant diagnosis after surgery were calculated by logistic regression analysis.Results: Altogether, 101 women were included with a mean age 56.1 (range 36-93) years. Most women were selected from the national mammography screening program due to microcalcifications. Biopsies were performed with vacuum-assisted biopsy (60.4%) or core-needle biopsy (39.6%). Forty-eight women (47.5%) underwent surgery, of which 11 were upgraded to DCIS, and 7 to invasive breast cancer (upgrade rate 37.5%). Among the 53 women managed conservatively (median follow-up 74 months), one woman (1.9%) developed subsequent ipsilateral DCIS. The combined upgrade rate was 18.8%. No clinical variable statistically significantly correlating to risk of upgrade was identified.Conclusions: The upgrade rate of 37.5% in women undergoing surgery compared to an estimated 5-year risk of ipsilateral malignancy at 1.9% in women managed conservatively indicate that non-surgical management of select women with ADH is feasible. Research should focus on defining reproducible criteria differentiating high-risk from low-risk ADH.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Scoring to predict the possibility of upgrades to malignancy in atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy device: An external validation study
    Bendifallah, S.
    Defert, S.
    Chabbert-Buffet, N.
    Maurin, N.
    Chopier, J.
    Antoine, M.
    Bezu, C.
    Touche, D.
    Uzan, S.
    Graesslin, O.
    Rouzier, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [2] Factors affecting the under-diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsies - A 10-year retrospective study and review of the literature
    Co, Michael
    Kwong, Ava
    Shek, Tony
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 49 : 27 - 31
  • [3] Stratification of breast cancer risk in women with atypia: A Mayo cohort study
    Degnim, Amy C.
    Visscher, Daniel W.
    Berman, Hal K.
    Frost, Marlene H.
    Sellers, Thomas A.
    Vierkant, Robert A.
    Maloney, Shaun D.
    Pankratz, V. Shane
    de Groen, Piet C.
    Lingle, Wilma L.
    Ghosh, Karthik
    Penheiter, Lois
    Tlsty, Thea
    Melton, L. Joseph, III
    Reynolds, Carol A.
    Hartmann, Lynn C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (19) : 2671 - 2677
  • [4] Factors associated with upgrading to malignancy at surgery of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy
    Deshaies, Isabelle
    Provencher, Louise
    Jacob, Simon
    Cote, Gary
    Robert, Jean
    Desbiens, Christine
    Poirier, Brigitte
    Hogue, Jean-Charles
    Vachon, Eric
    Diorio, Caroline
    [J]. BREAST, 2011, 20 (01) : 50 - 55
  • [5] DUPONT WD, 1993, CANCER, V71, P1258, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930215)71:4<1258::AID-CNCR2820710415>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-I
  • [7] Active surveillance of women diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia on core needle biopsy may spare many women potentially unnecessary surgery, but at the risk of undertreatment for a minority: 10-year surgical outcomes of 114 consecutive cases from a single center
    Farshid, Gelareh
    Edwards, Suzanne
    Kollias, James
    Gill, Peter Grantley
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 31 (03) : 395 - 405
  • [8] Discrepancies in the diagnosis of intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast and its management implications: results of a multinational survey
    Ghofrani, Mohiedean
    Tapia, Beatriz
    Tavassoli, Fattaneh A.
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2006, 449 (06) : 609 - 616
  • [9] Active Surveillance of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia of the Breast
    Han, Lynn K.
    Hussain, Anum
    Dodelzon, Katerina
    Ginter, Paula S.
    Towne, William S.
    Marti, Jennifer L.
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2023, 23 (06) : 649 - 657
  • [10] Atypical Hyperplasia of the Breast - Risk Assessment and Management Options
    Hartmann, Lynn C.
    Degnim, Amy C.
    Santen, Richard J.
    Dupont, William D.
    Ghosh, Karthik
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (01) : 78 - 89