Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis

被引:1
|
作者
Heine, John [1 ]
Fowler, Erin E. E. [1 ]
Weinfurtner, R. Jared [2 ]
Hume, Emma [1 ]
Tworoger, Shelley S. [1 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Canc Epidemiol, 12902 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Diagnost Imaging & Intervent Radiol, 12902 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CANCER RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY; SUSCEPTIBILITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-45402-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Mammography shifted to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the US. An automated percentage of breast density (PD) technique designed for two-dimensional (2D) applications was evaluated with DBT using several breast cancer risk prediction measures: normalized-volumetric; dense volume; applied to the volume slices and averaged (slice-mean); and applied to synthetic 2D images. Volumetric measures were derived theoretically. PD was modeled as a function of compressed breast thickness (CBT). The mean and standard deviation of the pixel values were investigated. A matched case-control (CC) study (n=426 pairs) was evaluated. Odd ratios (ORs) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. ORs were significant for PD: identical for volumetric and slice-mean measures [OR=1.43 (1.18, 1.72)] and [OR=1.44 (1.18, 1.75)] for synthetic images. A 2nd degree polynomial (concave-down) was used to model PD as a function of CBT: location of the maximum PD value was similar across CCs, occurring at 0.41xCBT, and PD was significant [OR=1.47 (1.21, 1.78)]. The means from the volume and synthetic images were also significant [ORs similar to 1.31 (1.09, 1.57)]. An alternative standardized 2D synthetic image was constructed, where each pixel value represents the percentage of breast density above its location. Several measures were significant and an alternative method for constructing a standardized 2D synthetic image was produced.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Artifacts in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Geiser, William R.
    Einstein, Samuel A.
    Yang, Wei-Tse
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (04) : 926 - 932
  • [32] Digital Tomosynthesis in breast imaging
    Niklason, LT
    Christian, BT
    Niklason, LE
    Kopans, DB
    Castleberry, DE
    OpsahlOng, BH
    Landberg, CE
    Slanetz, PJ
    Giardino, AA
    Moore, R
    Albagli, D
    DeJule, MC
    Fitzgerald, PF
    Fobare, DF
    Giambattista, BW
    Kwasnick, RF
    Liu, JQ
    Lubowski, SJ
    Possin, GE
    Richotte, JF
    Wei, CY
    Wirth, RF
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (02) : 399 - 406
  • [33] Microcalcifications in the breast and digital tomosynthesis
    Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine
    Ziade, Caroline
    Hurtevent-Labrot, Gabrielle
    Ferron, Stephane
    Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2016, 26 (3-4) : 157 - 159
  • [34] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis II
    Wilson, Thaddeus
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3764 - 3764
  • [35] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: an Overview
    Dhamija, Ekta
    Gulati, Malvika
    Deo, S. V. S.
    Gogia, Ajay
    Hari, Smriti
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (02) : 315 - 329
  • [36] Advances in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Hooley, Regina J.
    Durand, Melissa A.
    Philpotts, Liane E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (02) : 256 - 266
  • [37] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis I
    Sammet, Christina
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3752 - 3752
  • [38] Analysis of Geometric Accuracy in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction
    Bakic, Predrag R.
    Ringer, Peter
    Kuo, Johnny
    Ng, Susan
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2010, 6136 : 62 - +
  • [39] Differential detection by breast density for digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography population screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tong Li
    Nehmat Houssami
    Naomi Noguchi
    Aileen Zeng
    M. Luke Marinovich
    British Journal of Cancer, 2022, 127 : 116 - 125
  • [40] Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization
    Castillo-Garcia, Maria
    Chevalier, Margarita
    Garayoa, Julia
    Rodriguez-Ruiz, Alejandro
    Garcia-Pinto, Diego
    Valverde, Julio
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (07) : 802 - 810