Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis

被引:1
|
作者
Heine, John [1 ]
Fowler, Erin E. E. [1 ]
Weinfurtner, R. Jared [2 ]
Hume, Emma [1 ]
Tworoger, Shelley S. [1 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Canc Epidemiol, 12902 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Diagnost Imaging & Intervent Radiol, 12902 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CANCER RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY; SUSCEPTIBILITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-45402-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Mammography shifted to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the US. An automated percentage of breast density (PD) technique designed for two-dimensional (2D) applications was evaluated with DBT using several breast cancer risk prediction measures: normalized-volumetric; dense volume; applied to the volume slices and averaged (slice-mean); and applied to synthetic 2D images. Volumetric measures were derived theoretically. PD was modeled as a function of compressed breast thickness (CBT). The mean and standard deviation of the pixel values were investigated. A matched case-control (CC) study (n=426 pairs) was evaluated. Odd ratios (ORs) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. ORs were significant for PD: identical for volumetric and slice-mean measures [OR=1.43 (1.18, 1.72)] and [OR=1.44 (1.18, 1.75)] for synthetic images. A 2nd degree polynomial (concave-down) was used to model PD as a function of CBT: location of the maximum PD value was similar across CCs, occurring at 0.41xCBT, and PD was significant [OR=1.47 (1.21, 1.78)]. The means from the volume and synthetic images were also significant [ORs similar to 1.31 (1.09, 1.57)]. An alternative standardized 2D synthetic image was constructed, where each pixel value represents the percentage of breast density above its location. Several measures were significant and an alternative method for constructing a standardized 2D synthetic image was produced.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Ren, Baorui
    Smith, Andrew
    Jing, Zhenxue
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 8313
  • [2] Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis-a systematic review
    Ekpo, E. U.
    Mcentee, M. F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 87 (1043)
  • [3] Breast Density and Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A TOSYMA Trial Subanalysis
    Weigel, Stefanie
    Heindel, Walter
    Hense, Hans-Werner
    Decker, Thomas
    Gerss, Joachim
    Kerschke, Laura
    TOSYMA Screening Trial Study Grp
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (02)
  • [4] Comparative estimation of percentage breast tissue density for digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging
    Tagliafico, Alberto
    Tagliafico, Giulio
    Astengo, Davide
    Airaldi, Sonia
    Calabrese, Massimo
    Houssami, Nehmat
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 138 (01) : 311 - 317
  • [5] Digital breast tomosynthesis
    Hellerhoff, K.
    RADIOLOGE, 2010, 50 (11): : 991 - 998
  • [6] Calcifications in the Breast and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Kopans, Daniel
    Gavenonis, Sara
    Halpern, Elkan
    Moore, Richard
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (06) : 638 - 644
  • [7] Breast Density Assessment Using Breast Tomosynthesis Images
    Timberg, Pontus
    Fieselmann, Andreas
    Dustler, Magnus
    Petersson, Hannie
    Sartor, Hanna
    Lang, Kristina
    Fornvik, Daniel
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    BREAST IMAGING, IWDM 2016, 2016, 9699 : 197 - 202
  • [8] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    不详
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (06) : 1415 - 1417
  • [9] Digital breast tomosynthesis
    Preibsch, H.
    Siegmann-Luz, K. C.
    RADIOLOGE, 2015, 55 (01): : 59 - 69
  • [10] Fully Automated Volumetric Breast Density Estimation from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    Pantalone, Lauren
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Cohen, Eric A.
    Wu, Fang F.
    Winham, Stacey J.
    Jensen, Matthew R.
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Kontos, Despina
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 301 (03) : 561 - 568