Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis

被引:1
|
作者
Heine, John [1 ]
Fowler, Erin E. E. [1 ]
Weinfurtner, R. Jared [2 ]
Hume, Emma [1 ]
Tworoger, Shelley S. [1 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Canc Epidemiol, 12902 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Diagnost Imaging & Intervent Radiol, 12902 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CANCER RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY; SUSCEPTIBILITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-45402-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Mammography shifted to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the US. An automated percentage of breast density (PD) technique designed for two-dimensional (2D) applications was evaluated with DBT using several breast cancer risk prediction measures: normalized-volumetric; dense volume; applied to the volume slices and averaged (slice-mean); and applied to synthetic 2D images. Volumetric measures were derived theoretically. PD was modeled as a function of compressed breast thickness (CBT). The mean and standard deviation of the pixel values were investigated. A matched case-control (CC) study (n=426 pairs) was evaluated. Odd ratios (ORs) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. ORs were significant for PD: identical for volumetric and slice-mean measures [OR=1.43 (1.18, 1.72)] and [OR=1.44 (1.18, 1.75)] for synthetic images. A 2nd degree polynomial (concave-down) was used to model PD as a function of CBT: location of the maximum PD value was similar across CCs, occurring at 0.41xCBT, and PD was significant [OR=1.47 (1.21, 1.78)]. The means from the volume and synthetic images were also significant [ORs similar to 1.31 (1.09, 1.57)]. An alternative standardized 2D synthetic image was constructed, where each pixel value represents the percentage of breast density above its location. Several measures were significant and an alternative method for constructing a standardized 2D synthetic image was produced.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis
    John Heine
    Erin E. E. Fowler
    R. Jared Weinfurtner
    Emma Hume
    Shelley S. Tworoger
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [2] Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Ren, Baorui
    Smith, Andrew
    Jing, Zhenxue
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 8313
  • [3] Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis-a systematic review
    Ekpo, E. U.
    Mcentee, M. F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 87 (1043):
  • [4] Breast Density and Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A TOSYMA Trial Subanalysis
    Weigel, Stefanie
    Heindel, Walter
    Hense, Hans-Werner
    Decker, Thomas
    Gerss, Joachim
    Kerschke, Laura
    TOSYMA Screening Trial Study Grp
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (02)
  • [5] Digital breast tomosynthesis
    Hellerhoff, K.
    RADIOLOGE, 2010, 50 (11): : 991 - 998
  • [6] Digital breast tomosynthesis
    Maidment, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2184 - 2185
  • [7] Digital breast tomosynthesis
    Preibsch, H.
    Siegmann-Luz, K. C.
    RADIOLOGE, 2015, 55 (01): : 59 - 69
  • [8] Calcifications in the Breast and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Kopans, Daniel
    Gavenonis, Sara
    Halpern, Elkan
    Moore, Richard
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (06): : 638 - 644
  • [9] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    不详
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (06): : 1415 - 1417
  • [10] Breast Density and Tomosynthesis
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 301 (03) : 569 - 570