Accelerated Risk Assessment for Highly Automated Vehicles: Surrogate-Based Monte Carlo Method

被引:7
作者
Zhang, He [1 ]
Sun, Jian [1 ]
Tian, Ye [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Traff Engn, Key Lab Rd & Traff Engn, Minist Educ, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
关键词
Highly automated vehicles; accelerated risk assessment; surrogate models; Monte Carlo simulation;
D O I
10.1109/TITS.2023.3335104
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To validate whether Highly Automated Vehicles (HAVs) can live up to human expectations, it is essential to estimate their risk rate within the context of the naturalistic driving environment. Due to the low probability of exposure to risky events, the testing process is exceedingly time-consuming. To tackle this issue, we proposed a Surrogate-based Monte Carlo Method to accelerate the risk assessment for HAVs in scenario-based simulation. Surrogate Models (SMs) were utilized to approximate the outcomes of untested scenarios, hence facilitating the identification of risky scenarios. Therefore, the large number of samples required by Monte Carlo did not need to be tested entirely. Naturalistic distributions fitted from HighD data was used to generate samples. The Car-following and Cut-in scenarios were selected for the case study, as they represented two distinct testing spaces. As such, the capabilities of different SMs can be further analyzed. We proved that the performances of six mainstream SMs were greatly distinguished from each other. Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW), the proven most capable SM, was combined with Monte Carlo. Compared with Monte Carlo, up to 95% of tested samples can be saved. Compared with the Importance Sampling method, another popular improvement in Monte Carlo simulation, the proposed method can further save 58.1% of CPU execution time.
引用
收藏
页码:5488 / 5497
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   AK-SESC: a novel reliability procedure based on the integration of active learning kriging and sequential space conversion method [J].
Ameryan, Ala ;
Ghalehnovi, Mansour ;
Rashki, Mohsen .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 217
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SCENARIO DESCRIPTION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, 214482019 ISO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Conf., DOI DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2006.1706870
[5]  
Arief M., 2022, ARXIV
[6]   On Automated Vehicle Collision Risk Estimation using Threat Metrics in Subset Simulation [J].
Asljung, Daniel ;
Zanden, Carl ;
Fredriksson, Jonas ;
Vakilzadeh, Majid K. .
2021 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (ITSC), 2021, :58-63
[7]   Rare-event Simulation for Neural Network and Random Forest Predictors [J].
Bai, Yuanlu ;
Huang, Zhiyuan ;
Lam, Henry ;
Zhao, Ding .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MODELING AND COMPUTER SIMULATION, 2022, 32 (03)
[8]  
BEGLEROVIC H, 2017, 2017 IEEE 20 INT C I, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2017.8317768
[9]   Advances in surrogate based modeling, feasibility analysis, and optimization: A review [J].
Bhosekar, Atharv ;
Ierapetritou, Marianthi .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 108 :250-267
[10]   Automation interrupted: How autonomous vehicle accidents transform the material politics of automation [J].
Bissell, David .
POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 65 :57-66