Contextual determinants influencing the implementation of fall prevention in the community: a scoping review

被引:5
|
作者
van Scherpenseel, M. C. [1 ]
te Velde, S. J. [1 ]
Veenhof, C. [1 ,2 ]
Emmelot-Vonk, M. H. [3 ]
Barten, J. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] HU Univ Appl Sci Utrecht, Res Ctr Hlth & Sustainable Living, Res Grp Innovat Human Movement Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Rehabil Physiotherapy Sci & Sport, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Geriatr, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES | 2023年 / 3卷
关键词
fall prevention; implementation; contextual determinants; community-dwelling older adults; scoping review; GUIDELINE IMPLEMENTATION; CONSOLIDATED FRAMEWORK; CARE; HEALTH; INTERVENTION; BARRIERS; PROMOTE; PROGRAM; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/frhs.2023.1138517
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundSuccessful implementation of multifactorial fall prevention interventions (FPIs) is essential to reduce increasing fall rates in community-dwelling older adults. However, implementation often fails due to the complex context of the community involving multiple stakeholders within and across settings, sectors, and organizations. As there is a need for a better understanding of the occurring context-related challenges, the current scoping review purposes to identify what contextual determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators) influence the implementation of FPIs in the community.MethodsA scoping review was performed using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. First, electronic databases (Pubmed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO) were searched. Studies that identified contextual determinants that influence the implementation of FPIs in the community were included. Second, to both validate the findings from the literature and identify complementary determinants, health and social care professionals were consulted during consensus meetings (CMs) in four districts in the region of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Data were analyzed following a directed qualitative content analysis approach, according to the 39 constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.ResultsFourteen relevant studies were included and 35 health and social care professionals (such as general practitioners, practice nurses, and physical therapists) were consulted during four CMs. Directed qualitative content analysis of the included studies yielded determinants within 35 unique constructs operating as barriers and/or facilitators. The majority of the constructs (n = 21) were identified in both the studies and CMs, such as "networks and communications", "formally appointed internal implementation leaders", "available resources" and "patient needs and resources". The other constructs (n = 14) were identified only in the .DiscussionFindings in this review show that a wide array of contextual determinants are essential in achieving successful implementation of FPIs in the community. However, some determinants are considered important to address, regardless of the context where the implementation occurs. Such as accounting for time constraints and financial limitations, and considering the needs of older adults. Also, broad cross-sector collaboration and coordination are required in multifactorial FPIs. Additional context analysis is always an essential part of implementation efforts, as contexts may differ greatly, requiring a locally tailored approach.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors influencing older adult community fall prevention exercise implementation: a scoping review
    Sibley, Kathryn M.
    Tittlemier, Brenda
    Olarinde, Faith
    Leadbetter, Brianna K.
    Bouchard, Danielle R.
    AGE AND AGEING, 2024, 53 (08)
  • [2] Psychoeducation for fall prevention among community-dwelling older people: A scoping review
    Jbilou, Jalila
    Frenette, Joey
    Mazerolle, Marie-Pier
    Mclaughlin, Chloe
    Lovens, Caroline
    Handrigan, Grant
    Oros, Cornel
    Bonnal, Liliane
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2025,
  • [3] Determinants of Fall Prevention Guideline Implementation in the Home- and Community-Based Service Setting
    Juckett, Lisa A.
    Bunger, Alicia C.
    Jarrott, Shannon E.
    Dabelko-Schoeny, Holly, I
    Krok-Schoen, Jessica
    Poling, Rachael M.
    Mion, Lorraine C.
    Tucker, Sharon
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2021, 61 (06) : 942 - 953
  • [4] Facilitators and barriers to implementation of suicide prevention interventions: Scoping review
    Kasal, Alexandr
    Taborska, Roksana
    Jurikova, Laura
    Grabenhofer-Eggerth, Alexander
    Pichler, Michaela
    Gruber, Beate
    Tomaskova, Hana
    Niederkrotenthaler, Thomas
    CAMBRIDGE PRISMS-GLOBAL MENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 10
  • [5] Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes
    Nilsen, Per
    Bernhardsson, Susanne
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [6] Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes
    Per Nilsen
    Susanne Bernhardsson
    BMC Health Services Research, 19
  • [7] Factors influencing the implementation of fall-prevention programmes: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies
    Child, Sue
    Goodwin, Victoria
    Garside, Ruth
    Jones-Hughes, Tracey
    Boddy, Kate
    Stein, Ken
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 7
  • [8] The Implementation of Evidence-Informed Family Nursing Practices: A Scoping Review of Strategies, Contextual Determinants, and Outcomes
    Thuerlimann, Eva
    Verweij, Lotte
    Naef, Rahel
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING, 2022, 28 (03) : 258 - 276
  • [9] Knowledge translation theories in fall prevention and balance control: A scoping review
    Aloraini, Saleh M.
    Alothaim, Noot K.
    Alsalamah, Norah M.
    Aldaihan, Mishal M.
    PM&R, 2023, 15 (09) : 1175 - 1193
  • [10] A myriad of factors influencing the implementation of transitional care innovations: a scoping review
    Fakha, Amal
    Groenvynck, Lindsay
    de Boer, Bram
    van Achterberg, Theo
    Hamers, Jan
    Verbeek, Hilde
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (01)