Operation decision model in a platform ecosystem for car-sharing service

被引:6
|
作者
Cai, Jianhu [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Lishuang [1 ]
Hu, Xiaoqing [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Expt Ctr Data Sci & Intelligent Decis Making, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sharing platform ecosystem; Car -sharing service; Operation mode; Game theory; COMPETITION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101262
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Car-sharing platform (CSP) is becoming popular due to environmental friendliness and convenience. We consider the CSP ecosystem consisting of one CSP and one manufacturer, and others, and focus on CSP's two operation modes, including asset-heavy mode and asset-light mode. Under different operation modes, we construct game models for main ecosystem members based on exogenous and endogenous situations of the wholesale price and the revenue-sharing ratio, and analyze the CSP's decisions on the order quantity and service level, as well as the manufacturer's decision on the wholesale price or the revenue-sharing ratio. We find CSP ecosystem members' optimal decisions are affected by the CSP's dispatching capability, service cost coefficient, and new energy vehicle performance. The CSP and the manufacturer's preferences for two operation modes are obtained by comparing the optimal decisions and expected profits of main ecosystem members under different conditions. The conclusions provide important decision support for improving the CSP ecosystem's operational efficiency and driving the CSP ecosystem to build a more competitive operation system. This paper enriches the sharing platform ecosystem's connotation and expands its application scope from a modeling perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Car-sharing in the context of car operation
    Turon, K.
    Kubik, A.
    Lazarz Boguslaw, B.
    Czech, P.
    Stanik, Z.
    INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE CONFERENCE (KONMOT2018), 2018, 421
  • [2] Blockchain Based Car-Sharing Platform
    Valastin, Viktor
    Kost'al, Kristian
    Bencel, Rastislav
    Kotuliak, Ivan
    2019 61ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ELMAR, 2019, : 5 - 8
  • [3] Identifying key elements in a car-sharing system for constructing a comprehensive car-sharing model
    Qu Min
    Xiong Xing-fu
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 38 (02) : 2297 - 2309
  • [4] Optimal pricing model of car-sharing: market pricing or platform pricing
    Liang, Ling
    Tian, Lin
    Xie, Jiaping
    Xu, Jianhong
    Zhang, Weisi
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2021, 121 (03) : 594 - 612
  • [5] Personalized Instrument Cluster for Car-sharing Service: Like my car
    Kwon, Young-Jin
    Kim, KyongHo
    Kim, Do-Hyun
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ICT CONVERGENCE: DATA, NETWORK, AND AI IN THE AGE OF UNTACT (ICTC 2020), 2020, : 1717 - 1719
  • [6] Site selection for electric cars of a car-sharing service
    Ion, Luminita
    Cucu, T.
    Boussier, J.M.
    Teng, F.
    Breuil, D.
    World Electric Vehicle Journal, 2009, 3 (01):
  • [7] Optimal scheduling of electric vehicles car-sharing service with multitemporal and multi-task operation
    Lai, Kexing
    Chen, Tao
    Natarajan, Balasubramaniam
    ENERGY, 2020, 204
  • [8] Decentralized Social Media Applications as a Service: a Car-Sharing Perspective
    Palanisamy, Anandhakumar
    Sefidanoski, Mirsat
    Koulouzis, Spiros
    Rubia, Carlos
    Saurabh, Nishant
    Prodan, Radu
    2020 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS (ISCC), 2020, : 961 - 967
  • [9] Does Car-Sharing Reduce Car-Use? An Impact Evaluation of Car-Sharing in Flanders, Belgium
    Chapman, Donald A.
    Eyckmans, Johan
    Van Acker, Karel
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (19)
  • [10] Car-sharing takes off
    Burrall, Paul
    AUSTRALIAN PLANNER, 2008, 45 (01) : 61 - 61