Evaluating the perceptions of pesticide use, safety, and regulation and identifying common pesticide-related topics on Twitter

被引:3
作者
Jun, Inyoung [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Zheng [3 ]
Avanasi, Raghavendhran [4 ]
Brain, Richard A. [4 ]
Prosperi, Mattia [1 ,2 ]
Bian, Jiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Dept Epidemiol, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Hlth Outcomes & Biomed Informat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[4] Syngenta Crop Protect LLC, Greensboro, NC USA
关键词
Natural language processing; Pesticides perception; Sentiment analysis; Topic modeling; Twitter; SOCIAL MEDIA; NEGATIVITY BIAS; RISK PERCEPTION; INFORMATION; FARMWORKERS; COMMUNICATION; RELIABILITY; FIELD; AGE;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.4777
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Synthetic pesticides are important agricultural tools that increase crop yield and help feed the world's growing population. These products are also highly regulated to balance benefits and potential environmental and human risks. Public perception of pesticide use, safety, and regulation is an important topic necessitating discussion across a variety of stakeholders from lay consumers to regulatory agencies since attitudes toward this subject could differ markedly. Individuals and organizations can perceive the same message(s) about pesticides differently due to prior differences in technical knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and individual or group circumstances. Social media platforms, like Twitter, include both individuals and organizations and function as a townhall where each group promotes their topics of interest, shares their perspectives, and engages in both well-informed and misinformed discussions. We analyzed public Twitter posts about pesticides by user group, time, and location to understand their communication behaviors, including their sentiments and discussion topics, using machine learning-based text analysis methods. We extracted tweets related to pesticides between 2013 and 2021 based on relevant keywords developed through a "snowball" sampling process. Each tweet was grouped into individual versus organizational groups, then further categorized into media, government, industry, academia, and three types of nongovernmental organizations. We compared topic distributions within and between those groups using topic modeling and then applied sentiment analysis to understand the public's attitudes toward pesticide safety and regulation. Individual accounts expressed concerns about health and environmental risks, while industry and government accounts focused on agricultural usage and regulations. Public perceptions are heavily skewed toward negative sentiments, although this varies geographically. Our findings can help managers and decision-makers understand public sentiments, priorities, and perceptions and provide insights into public discourse on pesticides. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;00:1-19. (c) 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
引用
收藏
页码:1581 / 1599
页数:19
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Social media in health communication: A literature review of information quality [J].
Afful-Dadzie, Eric ;
Afful-Dadzie, Anthony ;
Egala, Sulemana Bankuoru .
HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 52 (01) :3-17
[2]   Social network analysis of spreading and exchanging information on Twitter: the case of an agricultural research and education centre in Mexico [J].
Aguilar-Gallegos, Norman ;
Klerkx, Laurens ;
Romero-Garcia, Leticia Elizabeth ;
Martinez-Gonzalez, Enrique Genaro ;
Aguilar-Avila, Jorge .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2022, 28 (01) :115-136
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 100 MOST INFLUENTIAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, New York Times
[5]   Pesticide safety among farmworkers: Perceived risk and perceived control as factors reflecting environmental justice [J].
Arcury, TA ;
Quandt, SA ;
Russell, GB .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 110 :233-240
[6]  
Auxier B., 2021, MAJORITY AM SAY THEY
[7]  
Avanasi R., 2023, J REGUL SCI, V11, P1, DOI DOI 10.21423/JRS.REGSCI.111249
[8]   Probabilistic Topic Models [J].
Blei, David M. .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2012, 55 (04) :77-84
[9]  
Blei DM, 2006, P 23 INT C MACH LEAR, P113
[10]   t factor: A metric for measuring impact on Twitter [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Haunschild, Robin .
MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2016, 21 (02) :13-20