Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire into Urdu language

被引:1
作者
Farooq, Muhammad Nazim [1 ]
Naz, Somiya [1 ]
Mughal, Aqsa Shafiq [1 ]
Sohail, Sara [1 ]
Anis, Maham [1 ]
机构
[1] Margalla Inst Hlth Sci, Islamabad Coll Physiotherapy, Quaid E Azam Ave Gulrez 3, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
关键词
Neck pain; outcome assessment; psychometrics; translations; validation study; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; DISABILITY SCALE; PAIN; RELIABILITY; TRANSLATION; VALIDITY; QUALITY; VERSION; INDEX; DUTCH;
D O I
10.1080/09593985.2023.2206477
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) has been translated and validated in a number of languages and has good psychometric properties for assessing neck pain. However, an Urdu translation is currently unavailable.Purpose: To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the NBQ into Urdu language (NBQ-U) in patients with nonspecific neck pain (NSNP).Methods: The NBQ was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Urdu using previously described guidelines. The study included 150 Urdu-speaking patients with NSNP and 50 healthy participants. All participants completed the NBQ-U, Urdu version of neck disability index (NDI-U), neck pain and disability scale (NPDS), and numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). After three weeks of physical therapy treatment, the patients completed all of the above-mentioned questionnaires, along with the global rating of change scale. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness were all tested.Results: The NBQ-U demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.92) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). The NBQ-U showed moderate to strong correlations with NDI-U, NPDS, and NPRS (r = 0.67-0.73, P < .001). The results revealed a significant difference between patients and healthy controls in the NBQ-U total scores (P < .001). The NBQ-U has a single factor structure with no floor or ceiling effects for individual item scores or total scores. A significant difference in the NBQ-U change scores between the stable and the improved groups (P < .001) confirmed its responsiveness. Furthermore, the NBQ-U change score showed moderate correlations with NDI-U, NPDS, and NPRS change scores (r = 0.52-0.62, P < .001).Conclusion: In Urdu-speaking patients with NSNP, the NBQ-U demonstrated good reliability, validity, and responsiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:1846 / 1855
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   The Bournemouth Questionnaire for Neck Pain: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Version [J].
Agce, Zeynep Bahadir ;
Sahin, Sedef ;
Yaran, Mahmut ;
Yuce, Deniz ;
Bumin, Gonca .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 43 (07) :708-713
[2]   Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[3]   Psychometric properties of the global rating of change scales in patients with low back pain, upper and lower extremity disorders. A systematic review with meta-analysis [J].
Bobos, Pavlos ;
Ziebart, Christina ;
Furtado, Rochelle ;
Lu, Ze ;
MacDermid, Joy C. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 21 :40-48
[4]   Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used for Neck Disorders: An Overview of Systematic Reviews [J].
Bobos, Pavlos ;
Macdermid, Joy C. ;
Walton, David M. ;
Gross, Anita ;
Santaguida, P. Lina .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2018, 48 (10) :775-+
[5]   Sensitivity and specificity of outcome measures in patients with neck pain: Detecting clinically significant improvement [J].
Bolton, JE .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (21) :2410-2417
[6]   The Bournemouth Questionnaire: A short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients [J].
Bolton, JE ;
Humphreys, BK .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 25 (03) :141-148
[7]   Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies [J].
Campbell, Rachel ;
Ju, Angela ;
King, Madeleine T. ;
Rutherford, Claudia .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (06) :1597-1620
[8]   Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 [J].
Cieza, Alarcos ;
Causey, Kate ;
Kamenov, Kaloyan ;
Hanson, Sarah Wulf ;
Chatterji, Somnath ;
Vos, Theo .
LANCET, 2020, 396 (10267) :2006-2017
[9]   Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Carr, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1996, 78B (04) :593-600
[10]   When to use agreement versus reliability measures [J].
de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;
Terwee, Caroline B. ;
Knol, Dirk L. ;
Bouter, Lex M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (10) :1033-1039