The Moral Economy of High-Tech Modernism

被引:13
作者
Farrell, Henry
Fourcade, Marion
机构
[1] University of California, Berkeley
关键词
D O I
10.1162/daed_a_01982
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
While people in and around the tech industry debate whether algorithms are political at all, social scientists take the politics as a given, asking instead how this politics unfolds: how algorithms concretely govern. What we call "high-tech modernism "- the application of machine learning algorithms to organize our social, economic, and political life-has a dual logic. On the one hand, like traditional bureaucracy, it is an engine of classification, even if it categorizes people and things very differently. On the other, like the market, it provides a means of self-adjusting allocation, though its feedback loops work differently from the price system. Perhaps the most important consequence of high-tech modernism for the contemporary moral political economy is how it weaves hierarchy and data-gathering into the warp and woof of everyday life, replacing visible feedback loops with invisible ones, and suggesting that highly mediated outcomes are in fact the unmediated expression of people's own true wishes.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 235
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SEEING STATE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Social Construction of What
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.aos.2009.02.003
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Sorting Things Out
[6]  
Arendt Hannah., 2000, The Portable Hannah Arendt, P31
[7]  
Barlow J., 1996, A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace
[8]   Big Data's Disparate Impact [J].
Barocas, Solon ;
Selbst, Andrew D. .
CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2016, 104 (03) :671-732
[9]  
Benjamin R., 2019, RACE TECHNOLOGY ABOL
[10]  
Brayne Sarah, 2020, Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780190684099.001.0001