Dramaturgies for Re-imagining Murray-Darling basin governing

被引:1
作者
Ison, Raymond L. L. [1 ]
Rubenstein, Naomi
Shelton, Madeline R. R. [2 ]
Wallis, Philip J. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Appl Syst Thinking Practice Res Grp, Milton Keynes, England
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, Australia
[3] Victorian Catchment Management Council, Melbourne, Australia
来源
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES | 2023年 / 27卷 / 02期
关键词
Governance performance; systemic failure; imaginaries; dramaturge; planning as dramaturgy; WATER GOVERNANCE; SYSTEMS THINKING; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; ANTHROPOCENE; TRANSITION; LEGITIMACY; DYNAMICS; SCIENCE; PRAXIS;
D O I
10.1080/13241583.2023.2171846
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Historically, governing, and thus planning, the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) has been framed in a plethora of ways. Seemingly, 'the plan' and planning has to be all things to all people, but the reforms, instituted in the Water Act 2007 (Cwlth), have resulted in greater complexity, uncertainty and controversy. Effective governing of the Basin along an unfolding, viable trajectory within an Anthropocene-world seems more elusive than ever. In this context, we propose a research and praxis agenda for dramaturgy as an initiative that seeks 'effective' water governance in the MDB. A dramaturge is someone,group, body or process who writes/adapts a play, brings forth a particular type of performance set in an ever-changing audience/context. Dramaturges engage in praxis. Two exemplar dramaturgies , developed through ex poste and ex ante analyses, are outlined. Each can be refined or consolidated in an on-going deliberative inquiry-process that generates social learning and effects concerted action for future MDB governance. Our research inquiry is exploratory but is based on a choice to frame governance from a cyber-systemic perspective, a praxis continually enacted through the interactions of actors, their symbols and frames and feedback dynamics between the social and biophysical world. We show how a dramaturgical framework can be used to analyse a policy process to reveal the important symbolic and performative dimensions, which are usually unrecognised.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 359
页数:14
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
ACHM, 2014, CULT FLOWS LIT REV
[2]  
Aldred J., 2019, Licence to be bad: How economics corrupted us
[4]   Losing the authority - what institutional architecture for cooperative governance in the Murray Darling Basin? [J].
Alexandra, Jason .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES, 2019, 23 (02) :99-115
[5]  
Alexandra J, 2017, WATER ECON POLICY, V3, DOI 10.1142/S2382624X16500387
[6]   Jumping Off the treadmill: transforming NRM to systemic governing with systemic co-inquiry [J].
Allan, Catherine ;
Ison, Ray L. ;
Colliver, Ross ;
Mumaw, Laura ;
Mackay, Moragh ;
Perez-Mujica, Luisa ;
Wallis, Philip .
POLICY STUDIES, 2020, 41 (04) :350-371
[7]   The role of experimentation in water management under climate uncertainty: Institutional barriers to social learning [J].
Ananda, Jayanath ;
McFarlane, Don ;
Loh, Michael .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2020, 30 (06) :319-331
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Guide to the proposed Basin Plan: overview
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1991, INTEGRATED CATCHMENT
[10]  
[Anonymous], Water Act 2007