Effects of consumers' context-dependent preferences on product bundling

被引:11
作者
Yin, Qianbo [1 ]
Jiang, Baojun [2 ,4 ]
Zhou, Sean Xiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Washington Univ, Olin Business Sch, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, CUHK Business Sch, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Washington Univ, Olin Business Sch, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
analytical modeling; bundling; competition; context-dependent preferences; PRICE; CHOICE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/poms.13932
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Bundling can change consumers' choice set and affect their purchase decision. It is well documented that consumers' preferences depend on the bundling context. In this paper, we investigate the effects of consumers' context-dependent preferences (CDPs) on the firm's optimal bundling strategy in various competitive situations. We consider a market where a monopolist firm in product category A also sells a product in product category B. We analyze three scenarios in category B: (1) an independent firm selling a higher quality product, (2) two independent firms selling the higher quality product, and (3) the monopolist in category A is also a monopolist in category B. We find that CDPs can indeed change the firm's optimal bundling strategy. When the firm has a competitive disadvantage in category B, CDPs encourage the firm to offer the bundle (by either pure bundling or mixed bundling). Furthermore, if category B market is so competitive that the firm possesses negligible market power, mixed bundling can be strictly more effective at increasing the firm's profit than pure bundling because mixed bundling can better take advantage of CDPs. In contrast, if the firm has monopoly power in both categories, CDPs discourage the introduction of the bundle, and pure-component selling is optimal.
引用
收藏
页码:1674 / 1691
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Context-dependent choice as explained by foraging theory [J].
Li, Shengwu ;
Yu, Ning Neil .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2018, 175 :159-177
[32]   Context-dependent savings in procedural category learning [J].
Crossley, Matthew J. ;
Ashby, F. Gregory ;
Maddox, W. Todd .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2014, 92 :1-10
[33]   Context-dependent expression of sperm quality in the fruitfly [J].
Decanini, Daniel Paz ;
Wong, Bob B. M. ;
Dowling, Damian K. .
BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 9 (06)
[34]   Context-dependent evaluation of prospective mates in a fish [J].
Locatello, Lisa ;
Poli, Federica ;
Rasotto, Maria B. .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2015, 69 (07) :1119-1126
[35]   Assessment of health in human faces is context-dependent [J].
Morgan, Kate V. ;
Morton, Andrew ;
Whitehead, Ross D. ;
Perrett, David I. ;
Hurly, T. Andrew ;
Healy, Spsan D. .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2016, 125 :89-95
[36]   Variation in Women's Preferences Regarding Male Facial Masculinity Is Better Explained by Genetic Differences Than by Previously Identified Context-Dependent Effects [J].
Zietsch, Brendan P. ;
Lee, Anthony J. ;
Sherlock, James M. ;
Jern, Patrick .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (09) :1440-1448
[37]   Positive mixture effects in pine-oak forests during drought are context-dependent [J].
Schmied, G. ;
Kappen, J. ;
del Rio, M. ;
Moser, W. K. ;
Gundale, M. J. ;
Hilmers, T. ;
Ambs, D. ;
Uhl, E. ;
Pretzsch, H. .
PLANT BIOLOGY, 2025,
[38]   Context-dependent effects of thermal acclimation on physiological correlates of animal personality in Asiatic toads [J].
Tan, Song ;
Li, Juan ;
Chen, Jingfeng ;
Fu, Jinzhong .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 291 (2027)
[39]   Early versus late noise differentially enhances or degrades context-dependent choice [J].
Shen, Bo ;
Nguyen, Duc ;
Wilson, Jailyn ;
Glimcher, Paul W. ;
Louie, Kenway .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 16 (01)
[40]   Context-dependent variation of house finch song syntax [J].
Ciaburri, Ivy ;
Williams, Heather .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 147 :33-42