Effects of consumers' context-dependent preferences on product bundling

被引:9
|
作者
Yin, Qianbo [1 ]
Jiang, Baojun [2 ,4 ]
Zhou, Sean Xiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Washington Univ, Olin Business Sch, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, CUHK Business Sch, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Washington Univ, Olin Business Sch, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
analytical modeling; bundling; competition; context-dependent preferences; PRICE; CHOICE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/poms.13932
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Bundling can change consumers' choice set and affect their purchase decision. It is well documented that consumers' preferences depend on the bundling context. In this paper, we investigate the effects of consumers' context-dependent preferences (CDPs) on the firm's optimal bundling strategy in various competitive situations. We consider a market where a monopolist firm in product category A also sells a product in product category B. We analyze three scenarios in category B: (1) an independent firm selling a higher quality product, (2) two independent firms selling the higher quality product, and (3) the monopolist in category A is also a monopolist in category B. We find that CDPs can indeed change the firm's optimal bundling strategy. When the firm has a competitive disadvantage in category B, CDPs encourage the firm to offer the bundle (by either pure bundling or mixed bundling). Furthermore, if category B market is so competitive that the firm possesses negligible market power, mixed bundling can be strictly more effective at increasing the firm's profit than pure bundling because mixed bundling can better take advantage of CDPs. In contrast, if the firm has monopoly power in both categories, CDPs discourage the introduction of the bundle, and pure-component selling is optimal.
引用
收藏
页码:1674 / 1691
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Temporal product bundling with myopic and strategic consumers: Manifestations and relative effectiveness
    Ashutosh Prasad
    R. Venkatesh
    Vijay Mahajan
    Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2017, 15 : 341 - 368
  • [12] Temporal product bundling with myopic and strategic consumers: Manifestations and relative effectiveness
    Prasad, Ashutosh
    Venkatesh, R.
    Mahajan, Vijay
    QME-QUANTITATIVE MARKETING AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 15 (04): : 341 - 368
  • [13] Context-dependent generalization
    Taylor, Jordan A.
    Ivry, Richard B.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [14] The Dynamic Effects of Bundling as a Product Strategy
    Derdenger, Timothy
    Kumar, Vineet
    MARKETING SCIENCE, 2013, 32 (06) : 827 - 859
  • [15] Context-Dependent Product Evaluations: An Empirical Analysis of Internet Book Reviews
    Hu, Ye
    Li, Xinxin
    JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MARKETING, 2011, 25 (03) : 123 - 133
  • [16] Irrational decision-making in an amoeboid organism: transitivity and context-dependent preferences
    Latty, Tanya
    Beekman, Madeleine
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 278 (1703) : 307 - 312
  • [17] Context-dependent female mate preferences in leaf-footed cactus bugs
    Addesso, Karla M.
    Short, Katherine A.
    Moore, Allen J.
    Miller, Christine W.
    BEHAVIOUR, 2014, 151 (04) : 479 - 492
  • [18] Product bundling or reserved product pricing? Price discrimination with myopic and strategic consumers
    Prasad, Ashutosh
    Venkatesh, R.
    Mahajan, Vijay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2015, 32 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [19] Context-dependent group size preferences in large shoals of three-spined sticklebacks
    Thuenken, Timo
    Eigster, Michael
    Frommen, Joachim G.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2014, 90 : 205 - 210
  • [20] Altering Preferences for Suicide Crisis Resources Using the Decoy Nudge: Evidence of Context-Dependent Effects in Suicide Prevention Decision Making
    Bauer, Brian W.
    Karnick, Aleksandrs
    Wells, Tony T.
    Tucker, Raymond P.
    Capron, Daniel W.
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 89 (01) : 11 - 20