Perspective taking and language features in secondary students' text-based analytical writing

被引:3
作者
Cho, Minkyung [1 ]
Kim, Young-Suk Grace [1 ]
Wang, Jiali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Educ, 401 E Peltason Dr,Suite 3200, Irvine, CA 92617 USA
关键词
ACADEMIC-LANGUAGE; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; SOCIAL-PERSPECTIVE; COGNITIVE SKILLS; VOCABULARY; QUALITY; 1ST-GRADE; MODEL; COMPREHENSION; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1080/10888438.2022.2132864
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study examined the extent of perspective taking and language features represented in secondary students' text-based analytical writing. We investigated (1) whether perspective taking is related to writing quality, accounting for language features in writing; (2) whether students' English learner status is related to perspectives represented in their writing; and (3) whether the relation between perspective taking and writing quality differs by the level of language features (e.g., syntactic diversity, appropriate word usage, and tone). Secondary students' text-based analytical essays (N= 195, Grades 7-12) were coded for perspective taking and language features and analyzed using multiple regression. There was a higher frequency of own-side perspectives than dual perspectives. Dual perspective was related to writing quality after accounting for student demographics and grade levels. However, the relation was no longer statistically significant when language features were accounted for. English learners exhibited significantly less own-side perspectives compared to their English-only counterparts, but there was no difference in dual perspectives, which might be due to overall low frequency of dual perspectives represented in students' text-based analytical writing. The findings suggest the roles of both perspective taking and language features in quality writing.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 214
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, DOI [DOI 10.1177/2372732218814855, 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0, DOI 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0]
[2]   The construction of visual-spatial situation models in children's reading and their relation to reading comprehension [J].
Barnes, Marcia A. ;
Raghubar, Kimberly P. ;
Faulkner, Heather ;
Denton, Carolyn A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 119 :101-111
[3]   The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints [J].
Barzilai, Sarit ;
Eshet-Alkalai, Yoram .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2015, 36 :86-103
[4]   Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? [J].
Beers, Scott F. ;
Nagy, William E. .
READING AND WRITING, 2009, 22 (02) :185-200
[5]  
Berman R., 2002, WRIT LANG LIT, V5, P253, DOI [DOI 10.1075/WLL.5.2.06BER, 10.1075/ wll.5.2.06ber]
[6]   Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye [J].
Berninger, VW ;
Abbott, RD ;
Abbott, SP ;
Graham, S ;
Richards, T .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2002, 35 (01) :39-56
[7]   Does perspective taking matter for writing? Perspective taking in source-based analytical writing of secondary students [J].
Cho, Minkyung ;
Kim, Young-Suk Grace ;
Olson, Carol B. .
READING AND WRITING, 2021, 34 (08) :2081-2101
[8]   Impact of first-grade factors on the growth and outcomes of urban schoolchildren's primary-grade writing [J].
Coker, David .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 98 (03) :471-488
[9]   A new academic word list [J].
Coxhead, A .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 2000, 34 (02) :213-238
[10]   The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality [J].
Crossley, Scott A. ;
Kyle, Kristopher ;
McNamara, Danielle S. .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2016, 32 :1-16