Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Dual-channel Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Spinal Scoliosis

被引:4
作者
You, Xuanjun [1 ]
Zhao, Bin [1 ]
Zhang, Tao [1 ]
Wang, Yongfeng [1 ]
Xu, Chaojian [1 ]
Yuan, Jie [1 ]
Liu, Ruxing [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Med Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Orthopaed, Taiyuan 030001, Peoples R China
关键词
Endoscopy; Lumbar vertebrae; Scoliosis; Spondylolisthesis; Treatment outcome; DEGENERATIVE DISEASES; SAGITTAL BALANCE; TECHNICAL NOTE; IN-SITU; DECOMPRESSION; TLIF;
D O I
10.1111/os.14046
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Scoliosis associated with spondylolisthesis is a common phenomenon. Recent research has reported that scoliosis can spontaneously disappear after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Researchers have advocated that, for scoliosis associated with vertebral slippage, surgery for the latter may be the only necessary intervention, while unnecessary surgery for scoliosis should be avoided. So we propose that minimally invasive techniques can achieve treatment effects similar to those of open surgery. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of unilateral dual-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal scoliosis. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis and spinal scoliosis who underwent ULIF between September 2021 and September 2023. Measurements of the Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis (LL) angle, sacral slope (SS), slip percentage (SP), slip angle (SA), L1 plumb line-S1 distance (LASD), and average intervertebral height (AIH) were taken preoperatively, immediately following surgery, 3 months after surgery, and at the final follow-up. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring systems were used to assess clinical results. The surgical efficacy was evaluated by comparing these parameters before and after surgery. Comparison of indicators within the same group was conducted using one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance or paired sample t-tests, whereas between-group differences were compared using an independent t-test. Results: This study included 31 individuals who underwent surgery and completed follow-up. The follow-up period did not show a significant loss of corrective angles. Furthermore, the Cobb angle, SP, SA, and LASD significantly decreased after surgery, whereas the LL angle, SS, and AIH significantly increased (all p < 0.05). SP did not differ between the immediate postoperative period and the 3-month and final follow-up periods (p > 0.05). However, other parameters significantly improved during the follow-up period at all time points, except from 3 months to the final follow-up period (p > 0.05). Throughout the follow-up period, the lower back and leg pain VAS, ODI, and JOA scores considerably improved compared with the preoperative levels (p < 0.05). Conclusion: ULIF effectively treated lumbar spondylolisthesis with scoliosis, thereby reducing the degree of slip and scoliosis. By performing surgical reduction, fusion, and fixation only on the slipped segment, ULIF also had a corrective effect on the spinal lateral curvature, thereby avoiding the need for unnecessary scoliosis surgery. Moreover, the short-term efficacy was satisfactory, but the long-term efficacy requires further study.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1142
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and spondylolisthesis [J].
Tsahtsarlis, Antonio ;
Wood, Martin .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (06) :858-861
[42]   Sequential MRI Changes After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Spondylolisthesis with Mild and Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J].
Takahashi, Yoshiyuki ;
Funao, Haruki ;
Yoshida, Kodai ;
Sasao, Yutaka ;
Nishiyama, Makoto ;
Isogai, Norihiro ;
Ishii, Ken .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 :E289-E296
[43]   Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Reduction For Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Mobile Microendoscopic Discectomy Technique [J].
Xu, Baoshan ;
Xu, Haiwei ;
Zhang, Hao ;
Ma, Xinlong ;
Liu, Yue ;
Yang, Qiang ;
Jiang, Hongfeng ;
Ji, Ning ;
Li, Ning .
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (02) :E63-E70
[44]   Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis [J].
Quante, M. ;
Kesten, H. ;
Richter, A. ;
Halm, H. .
ORTHOPADE, 2012, 41 (02) :153-+
[45]   Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis [J].
Rao, Prashanth J. ;
Ghent, Finn ;
Phan, Kevin ;
Lee, Keegan ;
Reddy, Rajesh ;
Mobbs, Ralph J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (10) :1619-1624
[46]   Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for correction of lumbosacral fractional curves in adult (thoraco)lumbar scoliosis: A systematic review [J].
Cummins, Daniel D. ;
Clark, Aaron J. ;
Gupta, Munish C. ;
Theologis, Alekos A. .
NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2024, 17
[47]   Comparing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis A STROBE- compliant observational study [J].
Zhang, Dapeng ;
Mao, Keya ;
Qiang, Xiaojun .
MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (37)
[48]   Minimally invasive unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of spinal stenosis and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis [J].
Chen, Kevin S. ;
Than, Khoi D. ;
LaMarca, Frank ;
Park, Paul .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35
[49]   Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PETLIF): Current Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Narrative Review [J].
Ono, Koichiro ;
Fukuhara, Daisuke ;
Nagahama, Ken ;
Abe, Yuichiro ;
Takahashi, Kenji ;
Majima, Tokifumi .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (16)
[50]   Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in Grade I/II spondylolisthesis [J].
Shanmugasundaram Pooswamy ;
Niranjanan Raghavn Muralidharagopalan ;
Sivasubramaniam Subbaiah .
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2017, 51 :131-138