Incremental Validity of MMPI-3 and NEO PI-3 Scores in Public Safety Candidate Pre-employment Psychological Evaluations

被引:1
作者
Whitman, Megan R. [1 ,4 ]
Holmes, Kaci [2 ]
Sue Elias, Laura [3 ]
Cappo, Bruce M. [3 ]
Ben-Porath, Yossef S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Psychol, Kent, OH USA
[2] Kent State Univ, Kent, OH USA
[3] Clin Associates, Lenexa, KS USA
[4] Kent State Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, 144 Kent Hall, Kent, OH 44242 USA
关键词
MMPI-3; NEO PI-3; public safety; pre-employment evaluation; incremental validity; risk assessment; INVENTORY-2-RESTRUCTURED FORM MMPI-2-RF; PERSONALITY-INVENTORY; PREDICTORS; BEHAVIOR; KAPPA;
D O I
10.1177/00938548231219809
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the incremental validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) and the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO PI-3) scores in predicting California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training dimension (i.e., the POST-10) ratings in public safety (n = 754) pre-employment psychological evaluations (PPEs). Although research has supported the use of the MMPI and NEO PI instruments separately, no study has evaluated the use of these abnormal- and normal-range tests in conjunction, consistent with the POST Manual requirement of use of clinical and normal-range personality measures. The MMPI-3 and NEO PI-3 were completed during PPE. Problem ratings in the POST-10 dimensions were rated using information from the assessing psychologist's report. MMPI-3 and NEO PI-3 scores incremented one another in nearly every hierarchical ordinal logit regression model conducted to predict the ratings for five dimensions. Clinical implications and limitations, including potential criterion contamination especially for NEO PI-3 scores, are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 352
页数:22
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1978, UNIFORM GUIDELINES E
[2]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2020, MMPI 3 MANUAL ADM SC
[3]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2020, MMPI 3 TECHNICAL MAN
[4]  
Butcher J.N., 1989, The Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory 2: Manual for administration and scoring
[5]  
Chibnall J.T., 2003, American Journal ofCriminal Justice, V27, P233, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02885696
[6]   Statewide Psychological Screening Mandates for Police Candidates in the United States: A Review and Comparison to the Standard of Practice [J].
Corey, David M. ;
McElroy, Heather K. ;
Ben-Porath, Yossef S. .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 54 (02) :156-166
[7]   Risks Associated With Overcontrolled Behavior in Police Officer Recruits [J].
Corey, David M. ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Ben-Porath, Yossef S. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2018, 30 (12) :1691-1702
[8]  
Costa P.T., 1992, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V4, P5, DOI DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
[9]   The Revised NEO Personality Inventory as predictor of police academy performance [J].
Detrick, P ;
Chibnall, JT ;
Luebbert, MC .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2004, 31 (06) :676-694
[10]  
Detrick P., 2006, PSYCHOL SERV, V3, P274, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1541-1559.3.4.274, https://doi.org/10.1037/1541-1559.3.4.274]