Considerations for environmental sustainability in clinical radiology and radiotherapy practice: A systematic literature review and recommendations for a greener practice

被引:27
作者
Anudjo, M. N. K. [1 ]
Vitale, C. [1 ,2 ]
Elshami, W. [3 ]
Hancock, A. [4 ]
Adeleke, S. [5 ,6 ]
Franklin, J. M. [1 ]
Akudjedu, T. N. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Inst Med Imaging & Visualisat, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Dept Med Sci & Publ Hlth, Poole, England
[2] IRCCS San Raffaele Hosp, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Sharjah, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Med Diagnost Imaging, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[4] Univ Exeter, Dept Med Imaging, Exeter, England
[5] Kings Coll London, Sch Canc & Pharmaceut Sci, Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BG, England
[6] UCL, UCL Queen Sq Inst Neurol, Dept Brain Repair & Rehabil, High Dimens Neurol, London, England
[7] Bournemouth Univ, Inst Med Imaging & Visualizat IMV, 114 Gateway Bldg,St Pauls Lane, Bournemouth BH8 8GP, England
关键词
Radiology; Climate change; Environmental sustainability; Green radiology; Systematic review; RAY CONTRAST-MEDIA; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; IMPACT; SERVICES; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.radi.2023.09.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Environmental sustainability (ES) in healthcare is an important current challenge in the wider context of reducing the environmental impacts of human activity. Identifying key routes to making clinical radiology and radiotherapy (CRR) practice more environmentally sustainable will provide a framework for delivering greener clinical services. This study sought to explore and integrate current evidence regarding ES in CRR departments, to provide a comprehensive guide for greener practice, education, and research. Methods: A systematic literature search and review of studies of diverse evidence including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach was completed across six databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs (QATSDD) was used to assess the included studies. A result-based convergent data synthesis approach was employed to integrate the study findings.Results: A total of 162 articles were identified. After applying a predefined exclusion criterion, fourteen articles were eligible. Three themes emerged as potentially important areas of CRR practice that contribute to environmental footprint: energy consumption and data storage practices; usage of clinical consumables and waste management practices; and CRR activities related to staff and patient travel.Conclusions: Key components of CRR practice that influence environmental impact were identified, which could serve as a framework for exploring greener practice interventions. Widening the scope of research, education and awareness is imperative to providing a holistic appreciation of the environmental burden of healthcare. Implications for practice: Encouraging eco-friendly travelling options, leveraging artificial Intelligence (AI) and CRR specific policies to optimise utilisation of resources such as energy and radiopharmaceuticals are recommended for a greener practice.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The College of Radiographers. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1077 / 1092
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Adu-Poku O, 2022, International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, V11, P12
  • [2] The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical radiography practice: A systematic literature review and recommendations for future services planning
    Akudjedu, T. N.
    Mishio, N. A.
    Elshami, W.
    Culp, M. P.
    Lawal, O.
    Botwe, B. O.
    Wuni, A. -R.
    Julka-Anderson, N.
    Shanahan, M.
    Totman, J. J.
    Franklin, J. M.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2021, 27 (04) : 1219 - 1226
  • [3] Choosing radiology imaging modalities to meet patient needs with lower environmental impact
    Alshqaqeeq, Fadhel
    McGuire, Charles
    Overcash, Michael
    Ali, Kamran
    Twomey, Janet
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 155 (155)
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, INTERGOVERNMENTAL PA
  • [5] Pharmaceuticals and the environment
    Bartolo, Nicolette Sammut
    Azzopardi, Lilian M.
    Serracino-Inglott, Anthony
    [J]. EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 155
  • [6] Artificial Intelligence in the NHS: Climate and Emissions
    Bloom, Ps
    Clutton-Brock, P.
    Pencheon, E.
    Magnusson, J.
    Karpathakis, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND HEALTH, 2021, 4
  • [7] National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg
    Bouette, Aurelien
    Karoussou-Schreiner, Alexandra
    Le Pointe, Hubert Ducou
    Grieten, Martijn
    de Kerviler, Eric
    Rausin, Leon
    Bouette, Jean-Christophe
    Majerus, Patrick
    [J]. INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2019, 10 (01)
  • [8] Briggs S, 2021, LANCET ONCOL, V22, pE38, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30740-3
  • [9] Quantitative Assessment of Computed Tomography Energy Use and Cost Savings Through Overnight and Weekend Power Down in a Radiology Department
    Brown, Maura
    Snelling, Eric
    De Alba, Moises
    Ebrahimi, Ghazal
    Forster, Bruce B.
    [J]. CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2023, 74 (02): : 298 - 304
  • [10] Climate Change: How Radiologists can Help
    Brown, Maura J.
    Forster, Bruce B.
    [J]. CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2022, 73 (03): : 456 - 457