Pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:5
作者
Lang, Yitian [1 ]
Lin, Yan [1 ]
Li, Dan [2 ]
Liu, Jiyong [2 ]
Liu, Xiaoyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Dept Pharm,Huangpu Branch, Shanghai 200011, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Pharm, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2023年 / 12卷 / 18期
关键词
advanced gastric cancer; cost-effectiveness; partitioned survival approach; pembrolizumab; the perspective of the US and China; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; NIVOLUMAB; SURVIVAL; DRUGS;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.6389
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The KEYNOTE-062 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for advanced gastric cancer (GC). The current study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced GC from the perspective of the United States and China. And the results will provide evidence and data support for more drug selection-related decisions and research in the future.Methods: A partitioned survival approach with three states was created for treatment of advanced GC. The survival data were derived from KEYNOTE-062 trial and the individual patient data were generated by a specific algorithm. We fitted 21 survival functions to each treatment arm and selected the most suitable distribution type for each one. Direct costs and utility values were collected from the published, available database. Cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were considered as the primary measure outcomes. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the reliability of the analyses.Results: In the base-case analysis of combined positive score (CPS) =1 patients, the ICUR of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in American and Chinese setting is $345,209/QALY and $186,802.6/QALY, respectively. And the ICUR of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy is $473,650/QALY and $377,753/QALY in the context of the US and China, respectively. For CPS=10 patients, the ICUR of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in American and Chinese setting is $483,742/QALY and $262,965/QALY, respectively. And that of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy is $96,550/QALY and $67,896/QALY in the context of the US and China.Conclusion: Compared with chemotherapy, either pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy or pembrolizumab monotherapy is not regarded as a cost-effective strategy for patients with CPS=1, advanced gastric cancer in the current American and Chinese setting. But pembrolizumab monotherapy for CPS=10 patients would become a cost-effective option in the American setting.
引用
收藏
页码:18447 / 18459
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in HER2-positive gastric cancer treatment in Iran: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Kaveh, Sara
    Ghadimi, Nashmil
    Alvar, Amirhossein Zarei
    Roudini, Kamran
    Daroudi, Rajabali
    HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy and pembrolizumab monotherapy in the first-line treatment of squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in the US
    Insinga, Ralph P.
    Vanness, David J.
    Feliciano, Josephine L.
    Vandormael, Kristel
    Traore, Sory
    Ejzykowicz, Flavia
    Burke, Thomas
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2019, 35 (07) : 1241 - 1256
  • [23] Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A cost-effectiveness analysis from Chinese perspective
    Zhou, Kexun
    Li, Yunzhu
    Liao, Weiting
    Zhang, Mengxi
    Bai, Liangliang
    Li, Qiu
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 107
  • [24] Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Oesophageal Cancer
    Wu, Meiyu
    Qin, Shuxia
    Wang, Liting
    Tan, Chongqing
    Peng, Ye
    Zeng, Xiaohui
    Luo, Xia
    Yi, Lidan
    Wan, Xiaomin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [25] Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab vs. Chemotherapy in Pretreated Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Feng, Mingyang
    Chen, Yue
    Yang, Yang
    Li, Qiu
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Gong, Jinhong
    Shang, Jingjing
    Su, Dan
    Qian, Xiaodan
    Liu, Guangjun
    Sun, Zhiqiang
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (06) : 709 - 717
  • [27] First-line tremelimumab plus durvalumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in the United States
    Liu, Wenjie
    Huo, Gengwei
    Chen, Peng
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in China
    Xiang, Zuojuan
    Ma, Ling
    Fu, Yingzhou
    Pan, Yong
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Aziz, Mohamed Ismail Abdul
    Tan, Ling Eng
    Tan, Wan Hui Gloria
    Toh, Chee-Keong
    Loke, Lydia Pui Yee
    Pearce, Fiona
    Ng, Kwong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (09) : 952 - 960
  • [30] Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-pretreated, recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer
    Nie, Jing
    Wu, Huina
    Wu, Qian
    Liu, Lihui
    Tang, Ke
    Wang, Shuo
    Wu, Jiyong
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2024, 22 (01)