Pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Lang, Yitian [1 ]
Lin, Yan [1 ]
Li, Dan [2 ]
Liu, Jiyong [2 ]
Liu, Xiaoyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Dept Pharm,Huangpu Branch, Shanghai 200011, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Pharm, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2023年 / 12卷 / 18期
关键词
advanced gastric cancer; cost-effectiveness; partitioned survival approach; pembrolizumab; the perspective of the US and China; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; NIVOLUMAB; SURVIVAL; DRUGS;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.6389
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The KEYNOTE-062 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for advanced gastric cancer (GC). The current study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced GC from the perspective of the United States and China. And the results will provide evidence and data support for more drug selection-related decisions and research in the future.Methods: A partitioned survival approach with three states was created for treatment of advanced GC. The survival data were derived from KEYNOTE-062 trial and the individual patient data were generated by a specific algorithm. We fitted 21 survival functions to each treatment arm and selected the most suitable distribution type for each one. Direct costs and utility values were collected from the published, available database. Cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were considered as the primary measure outcomes. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the reliability of the analyses.Results: In the base-case analysis of combined positive score (CPS) =1 patients, the ICUR of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in American and Chinese setting is $345,209/QALY and $186,802.6/QALY, respectively. And the ICUR of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy is $473,650/QALY and $377,753/QALY in the context of the US and China, respectively. For CPS=10 patients, the ICUR of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in American and Chinese setting is $483,742/QALY and $262,965/QALY, respectively. And that of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy is $96,550/QALY and $67,896/QALY in the context of the US and China.Conclusion: Compared with chemotherapy, either pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy or pembrolizumab monotherapy is not regarded as a cost-effective strategy for patients with CPS=1, advanced gastric cancer in the current American and Chinese setting. But pembrolizumab monotherapy for CPS=10 patients would become a cost-effective option in the American setting.
引用
收藏
页码:18447 / 18459
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Youwen Zhu
    Kun Liu
    Dong Ding
    Yangying Zhou
    Libo Peng
    Advances in Therapy, 2022, 39 : 2614 - 2629
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Aziz, Mohamed Ismail Abdul
    Tan, Ling Eng
    Tan, Wan Hui Gloria
    Toh, Chee-Keong
    Loke, Lydia Pui Yee
    Pearce, Fiona
    Ng, Kwong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (09) : 952 - 960
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus standard chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the first-line treatment of unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Yuan Jiang
    Yue Li
    Larry X. W. Wang
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2022, 44 : 499 - 506
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus standard chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the first-line treatment of unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Jiang, Yuan
    Li, Yue
    Wang, Larry X. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2022, 44 (02) : 499 - 506
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy and pembrolizumab monotherapy in the first-line treatment of squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in the US
    Insinga, Ralph P.
    Vanness, David J.
    Feliciano, Josephine L.
    Vandormael, Kristel
    Traore, Sory
    Ejzykowicz, Flavia
    Burke, Thomas
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2019, 35 (07) : 1241 - 1256
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness analysis of continuing bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone after first progression of metastatic colorectal cancer
    Li, Yulian
    Hu, Min
    Zhang, Zhe
    Chu, Mingming
    Xu, Rufu
    Liu, Lulu
    Dong, Wenxing
    Yang, Mengmeng
    Zhang, Rong
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (01):
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness of Cetuximab as a treatment strategy for metastatic colon cancer in Peru: chemotherapy/Cetuximab versus chemotherapy alone
    Bolanos-Diaz, Rafael
    Sanabria-Montanez, Cesar
    Farfan-Tello, Carlos
    Calderon-Cahua, Maria
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 9 (04) : 319 - 326
  • [28] Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Oesophageal Cancer
    Wu, Meiyu
    Qin, Shuxia
    Wang, Liting
    Tan, Chongqing
    Peng, Ye
    Zeng, Xiaohui
    Luo, Xia
    Yi, Lidan
    Wan, Xiaomin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [29] Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab vs. Chemotherapy in Pretreated Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Feng, Mingyang
    Chen, Yue
    Yang, Yang
    Li, Qiu
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [30] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PALLIATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER
    GLIMELIUS, B
    HOFFMAN, K
    GRAF, W
    HAGLUND, U
    NYREN, O
    PAHLMAN, L
    SJODEN, PO
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1995, 6 (03) : 267 - 274